Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3740 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a letter from the Magistrate Court telling me I owe £370 which was sent to me around November time. Did not have a clue what it was for so tried to call the number provided for 7 days straight and not once did I get through to anyone to query the letter. Left it that thinking maybe I'll receive more information soon.

 

Then recieve a letter dated 2nd January 2014 from Marston High Court Enforcement Officers & Certificated Bailiffs which now said I owe £455 (370 fine + 85 fees) and this letter did give me the information that I could not get from the court. It was a ''speeding - exceed 30 mph on a restricted road on 04/02/2010''. If I would of ever been reminded I would of paid the original £60 or £90 whatever it was to save all this hassle.

 

It told me I had 7 days to pay or bailiffs will attend to levy distress and remove goods for a public auction sale with a minimum further cost of £215. Did not get to this letter as I had been away working.

 

I then get a phone call on my lunch break at work from a Marston Bailiff on Friday just gone. He introduced himself and told me he was outside my house (which is my mum's house & she is the only 1 listed on the tenancy agreement). He basically said I had to pay which I replied I cant afford to and I would be willing to pay in installments. The best he could offer me was 1 week to pay half which has now turned into £670 so £335 next week & £335 the following week which I can not afford. He said or the only other option is to get a locksmith out, enter the house and take goods up to the £670 ''owed''. I did mention to him that the only possesions I have at the house are basic needs, clothes, bed, wardrobe etc... no ''luxury goods'' but my mum does have luxury items which she has worked hard for ie. Big tv, stereo system etc... He then replied ''the courts dont care as long as they get their money back''

 

 

When I got home there was a big red hand posted letter ''FINAL NOTICE'' telling me I had literally this last chance or more costs will be added. He was ok over the phone but he was pretty stern in telling me its either this or locksmiths.

 

My problems and concerns are can he enter the house with a locksmith even when nobody is in?

If they do gain entry can they take my mums goods even though I have told them their not mine?

Can they take my bed, clothes and other basic needs?

 

Really stressed out over this as I cannot afford just to pay out £670. Is there any chance I could go to the courts with all my documents and kind of get the fine reduced or put back to its original cost. Really dont know what to do about this and I fear they'll enter the house and I'll come home from work and all my mothers items have been taken.

 

Thanks in advance

Edited by L11Marc26
Link to post
Share on other sites

As it is a court fine there is entry by force ....

 

They can not take goods not belonging to the debtor

You will need to get down to the court first thing tomorrow

Statue declaration will be the best way forwards

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Partial quote "Marston bailiff help needed ASAP

Had a letter from the Magistrate Court telling me I owe £370 which was sent to me around November time. Did not have a clue what it was for so tried to call the number provided for 7 days straight and not once did I get through to anyone to query the letter. Left it that thinking maybe I'll receive more information soon."

As if as you say you knew nothing of the debt then you MUST get a STATUTORY DECLARATION sworn asap this will reset the clock and bailiff enforcement ceases, you have a new case then it starts all over again. If you are lucky and they accept it then they will inform you of a new court date. YOU MUST ATTEND, and make sure you fill out the financial means form then hand it in to the Clerk of the Court for assessment to pay at a certain level.

 

Did the letter state what the offence was alleged? Can you state as different rules apply for different Courts ok.

 

 

MM

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court letter did not state anything about the offence. Simply that it was a £370 fine

 

Gave a number to call but constantly left me on hold daily for a long time

 

Ive never been in this sort of situation before so can I just turn up at Merseyside Magistrates and sort this form out you say an then they will be in touch with the bailiffs to halt any action?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok it looks like a case was dealt with in your absence and you got a fine, again pop to your local court explain this and ask to make a Statutory Declaration, but you can only do this if you knew nothing of the case on the day it was heard.

 

 

It's very easy to do, the Clerk of the Court reads this out and you repeat it after them, the case is then ceased and a new date maybe set, but I should go to the court and not call as it's harder to turn you away... Once the case has been "set aside" then all Bailiff activity ceases.

 

 

But if you are given this option then don't mess it up as you will then be in deep trouble. Did you receive a further steps notice after not paying your fine? or have you moved? did you surrender your license for the placing of penalty points on it? Is your license up to date, like the current address is correct?

 

 

Can you say more about the day of the hearing? or did you just forget it and bury your head in the sand? I am trying not to be too blunt but need to understand the full reason behind non payment that's all ok?

 

 

MM

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive been given the advice to take my mum to a solicitors to make a Statutory Declaration stating all items in the house are her property (this is true) even stuff in my room she has bought in her name I barely have any valuables worth taken to be sold for auction. Just dont want her things being taken as I will have to replace them for her in the long run

 

Yeah I received a further steps notice which gave options like Making an attachment of earnings order, application for benefit deductions etc. But I opted to phone them to ask what the hell the fine was for as I had no idea and that's were I had no joy and the date passed

 

I must of surrended my license but I can't really remember if any points were given for this offence, Id have to call the DVLA on that one to make sure they were. Yeah license is up to date in my current address

 

I cannot remember a thing about the day of the hearing. I cant even remember being given a date to go to court. I couldnt tell you wether it was 2010, 2011 or anything about it. Yeah I understand your questions and why your asking them. Thanks for the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must of surrended my license but I can't really remember if any points were given for this offence, Id have to call the DVLA on that one to make sure they were. Yeah license is up to date in my current address

 

 

So have you got back your license? with the relevant points issued? Cause somewhere in my mind there is something that you only have 21 days or something like that to deal with this type of issue. Once you are aware of it.

 

 

Secondly good advise with regards to the property within the home. Send a copy off the Bailiffs office, are you working or on benefits?

 

 

MM

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive got my license back but it does not state anything to do with that incident on the paper part. Although I was given a 6 month ban on 19th Jan 2011 for totting up 12 points so thats maybe why its not listed and just the ban is.

 

Im in full time work 40 hours per week. I'll have to get the that done asap as I think their going to come back round any day this week without notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are caught between a rock and a hard place my best advice is to go to court Monday and deal with that first, then straight to the Solicitors, but if the Court takes your declaration then and there the Bailiff is dealt with as well. Let us know what happens either way. Also read up on the stickies here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?407528-HMCS-Forced-Entry-Protocol-for-use-by-bailiffs-enforcing-Magistrates-Court-FINES(1-Viewing)-nbsp courtesy of tomtubby.

 

 

MM

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marc

 

I am sorry to tell you but you COULD have problems.

 

Firstly, almost all Magistrates Courts insist that Statutory Declarations are made IN PERSON and therefore the normal situation is that they make an appointment for a certain date ( usually about 7-10 days time) for the debtor to attend to swear the Stat Dec.

 

Sadly there are some internet sites that claim that if a debtor had not known of a court fine that the warrant is REVOKED by filing something called a Section 14 Stat Dec. This is actually NOT true. In the past month we have had quite a few cases where the court have REFUSED to allow the Statutory Declaration to be filed given that the debtor failed to contact the court within the strict time as outlined in the Further Steps Notice !!!

 

A Statutory Declaration must be filed "within 21 days of becoming aware of the offence". In your case, the court could well argue that you had known of the speeding conviction long ago as you had returned your licence to DVLA to be endorsed.

 

When the speeding offence took place, were you living at the same address as you are now ( if not, this could assist you in arguing that you had been aware of the matter).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marc

 

I am sorry to tell you but you COULD have problems.

 

Firstly, almost all Magistrates Courts insist that Statutory Declarations are made IN PERSON and therefore the normal situation is that they make an appointment for a certain date ( usually about 7-10 days time) for the debtor to attend to swear the Stat Dec.

 

Sadly there are some internet sites that claim that if a debtor had not known of a court fine that the warrant is REVOKED by filing something called a Section 14 Stat Dec. This is actually NOT true. In the past month we have had quite a few cases where the court have REFUSED to allow the Statutory Declaration to be filed given that the debtor failed to contact the court within the strict time as outlined in the Further Steps Notice !!!

 

A Statutory Declaration must be filed "within 21 days of becoming aware of the offence". In your case, the court could well argue that you had known of the speeding conviction long ago as you had returned your licence to DVLA to be endorsed.

 

When the speeding offence took place, were you living at the same address as you are now ( if not, this could assist you in arguing that you had been aware of the matter).

 

 

Please read the second to last sentence, this is why we ask if you knew of the offence at the time, this may well not now assist you because you surrendered your license for endorsing....

 

 

Also you will have received I think the Further Steps letter from the Courts also. having the full story goes better for you with advise from the Forums, this way it will NOT make advise given incorrect. Hence this again is why we ask in-depth questions on all questions in these forums,

 

 

Since this is now out with the Bailiff for enforcement action it will be much harder for you not to pay the fine, fees and if you still put off paying, a committal warrant could be issued. As you say you "personally " do not have any items of value or the means to pay this, so this MAY get very messy very quickly. Sorry to have to say this but this is what happens if the defendant does not comply with a Court order to pay. Also please be very careful in what advise you take from "other " forums in regards to the fees now levied. Don't place a notice of revoked implied right to attend your property, as a Bailiff has these rights, see here, for further info. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?392005-Removal-of-Implied-Right-of-Access-notices.....CIVEA-advises-bailiff-companies-to-IGNORE-the-notices(2-Viewing)-nbsp again courtesy of tomtubby

 

 

MM

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the speeding offence took place, were you living at the same address as you are now ( if not, this could assist you in arguing that you had been aware of the matter).

 

 

Yeah same address as when the offence took place

 

Im going to call the DVLA after work to make sure the points were added

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah same address as when the offence took place

 

Im going to call the DVLA after work to make sure the points were added

 

Have they returned your License?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...