Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cheque centre PDL and a default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3748 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I was unfortunate enough to have a payday loan which I couldn't pay on the payment date (it was a hefty sum of money).

 

The lenders called me on the same day after for a chat in which I advised I couldnt pay them this month and that I didn't have the original documents.

 

This wasn't a problem and the adviser told me that if I could make two payments (both at full interest ) then the balance would be closed and I could lend with them again. he also stated that I would not be defaulted if the payments where made.

 

I agreed and one month down the line the first payment was due, which was paid in full over the phone. I asked the guy on the other end to just reiterate that I would not be defaulted and he said absolutely not.

 

SO! final payment was made the month after. In full and on time... And i was defaulted :/

 

According to the company I was 1 day over their internal criteria for defaulting (90) days. Never did they tell me this over the phone, according to 3 people (and at expensive call rates) I would have been fine.

 

Even if they had told me I needed to pay 1 sodding day early or my primary aim of not being defaulted wouldn't be for filled I could have lent or hell be it get another loan for a day!

 

Do I have any sort of defence being that I was totally misadvised by them? They also refused to put any documentation regarding the repayment plan together other than the phone calls and internal 'notes'?

 

I really need this thing removing :(

 

Cheers for any support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a problem with making arrangements over the phone, there i no paper trail to confirm the arrangement.

 

Have you contacted them since and reminded them or the conversation, what did they say.

 

I would email them with the contents of your first post, remind them that under ICO guidelines a default should only be entered when" the relationship between the parties has irrevocably broken down".

 

The fact that an arrangement was agreed and the repayment schedule extended, and also that you paid for the privilege by being liable for contractual interest indicates that the contractual relationship had far from broken down.

 

Remind them that if they enter false or misleading data on a credit file and this results in losses on your part you can and will take action against them for damages.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly, unless you have proof that they said no default would be entered, youre out of luck. As DB said, no paper trail means the PDL will please ignorance. They are trained to tell you ANYTHING over the phone to get you to pay. You even fell for the old trick of paying them extra interest.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for relying.

 

I called as soon as I checked my experian report (it was within a day because I receive email alerts).

 

I then called the Payday lenders and asked them to explain, and again I was told this shouldn't have happened and that they are sorry.

 

Last week I then receive a letter saying that I was missadvised on the final repayment date (by one day and on 3 occasions 1 being by a manager at the company) and that has caused the default. They are telling me this is their final decision but they are more than happy for me to add a notice of correction to my credit file where by the default says on, just with a few words after it....

 

I'm still stuck for 6 years though@

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youre problem is you keep talking to them on the phone. You need to forget the phone exists and do everything in writing.

 

I would be getting a formal complaint to their data controller, the FOS and ICO.

 

Like i said, you fell for their trick, hook line and sinker. You paid the debt, you gave them extra interest because you believed their lies, and they still defaulted you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I originally called them I'm 99% certain that I requested this in writing or as an email but it never came though. Is it possible to request telephone records under the data protection act? given that they are a financial institution they would need to keep these right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

See, theres the problem again. You CALLED them. They will say ANYTHING on the phone, then when challenged, say they never even received the call. Thats why everything needs to be done in writing from the outset.

 

As for records, PDL's do not record the call, or if they do, it is very rare.

 

given that they are a financial institution they would need to keep these right?

 

They are meant to do a LOT of things, but dont. The PDL industry is very under regulated and their business practices are borderline criminal.

 

I know one reason why it's like this, but if i post it on an open forum, it could bring CAG into disrepute. Suffice to say, we know why, and the chance of the government sorting it out is pretty much nil.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly given that this was all set up as soon as they called me I pretty much had no choice in the matter.

I'll contact the FOS and ICO but I'm not going to hold my breath....

 

Given that I'm unlikely now to get any form of mortgage/finance for the next 6 years (well 10 years.. as most lenders wont now consider someone with a PDL on their credit file anyway) I might as well sit back and not care haha.

 

Cheers for the information guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always contest the default if you think its unfair. Dont let the issue drop. As youve said, it will affect you for a good amount of time, simply due to their unlawful practices.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, which PDL was this?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...