Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, just to close this one, please see the photos below....before and after    Thank you, all, for some great advice (as per usual!)
    • Thanks BankFodder.   I wasn't intending on making bones about it with them but I was irked at being dismissed with the phrase 'it's store policy'.  I returned it because I was returning an air hockey game which wasn't functioning properly.  I would have assumed that if it were designed as a toy for an audience that may be prone to dropping it, it would be made to be suitably durable.  I was expecting that a year would have been reasonable and by it not lasting it was, as you mentioned, not of satisfactory quality. Alas, it's not something I wish to pursue to find out for sure.   I do appreciate your feedback, as always on here, I like to know where I stand with these things.  Thanks also for the heads-up on the Youtube video, I had not thought of that.
    • I've also being doing some reading over the weekend. It appears the law of properties act 1925 does not apply in Scotland (only England and Wales).   "In Scotland an assignation need not be in writing, and intimation is all that is needed to give the assignee a right effective against all parties. Apart from the terminology, the principal differences in England are as follows. Under the Law of Property Act 1925 the assignment must be in writing, the entire benefit must be assigned, and notice must be given to the other contracting party. If any of these elements are missing there may still be an equitable assignment – under which an assignee would typically need to join the assignor as a party to any action under the contract."   So I think the NOA defence is not going to hold up, as Nolans are probably right in what they are saying that their letter (intimation) is sufficient.   So my sole defence is going to be lack of default notice under section 87/88.   Any advice at this stage? I assume costs are still capped at £150 if lose?
    • Hi bankfodder. I do have the invoice in my email, so would it be the cost of the turbo and labour for fitting
    • as i said unsure of what this 15% is about.   the FOS/FCA clearly describe how refund calcs show have been made the their relevant sites.   p'haps at this juncture it might be better to scan up to ONE multipage PDF their refund letters  another set of eyes is always belter.   please read our upload guide carefully      
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
        • Like
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2430 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is my first post.

 

I was stopped today by a FGW enforcement team as I got off the train at Windsor.

 

The issue is I had used my wife's monthly ticket for the journey from Slough.

I had actually driven from Uxbridge where I work to Slough to meet my wife who was on the train from Paddington;

she had a patient to see in Burnham (she's a physio) so there seemed little point in her completing her usual journey to Windsor

to then drive back so we did a swap;

she took the car,

I took her ticket (with photo ID).

 

We didn't think it would be an issue,

the ticket had been paid for and only one person was doing the journey.

the enforcement officers didn't agree;

they confiscated her ticket (so now she'll have to either buy a new one or dailys until it is returned, if it is returned)

 

we are losing money there and i may be faced with prosecution.

 

They didn't mention a fine so i feel i'm completely in no man's land.

 

The journey to Windsor from Slough costs £2.30,

the idea of a hefty fine and possible criminal record over such a stupid mistake is really scary.

There was no intent to fair dodge, we felt as a couple we'd paid and had a valid ticket.

 

Also one of the enforcement officers said when asked that if i'd had no ticket at all I'd have just been fined…

so to FGW it seems it's worse to have your wife's valid ticket than no ticket at all.

 

Any advice on what I should do would be very much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most monthly travel tickets are non transferable, so the person who uses another persons ticket, would be travelling effectively without a ticket. So I would have thought that they should have just issued you with a penalty fare ticket and told you not to use your wifes ticket again.

 

They should really have told you what they were going to do about this at the time, rather than just leave it. Perhaps they will just send your wifes monthly ticket back to her, with a warning to her, not to let other people use it.

 

I am not expert in fare rules, so let others advise you. This is just my commonsense view on it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks unclebulgaria.

We're both all too aware of that now.

There were eight or nine of the officers there so I feel like they were towing a hard line,

only saying I'd hear back in four weeks.

 

I'm not so worried about me, but my wife is saying she's going to buy a whole new monthly ticket so will effectively be paying twice this month

… seems if they're going by the letter of the law then surely I'm the issue here;

why should she be hit so hard when effectively you could say i took her ticket so it's my problem?

 

Feels like we're being potentially punished twice;

do you or anyone else know if she could claim the dailys back if she bought some whilst they are holding her ticket?

 

The ticket also covered her tube journeys so by taking the ticket FGW are forcing her to use her oyster card;

maybe she should buy individual journeys and claim them back too??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a previous thread which should help you. Seems that it is taken seriously.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?299301-Using-someone-else-s-ticket

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are not forcing her to do anything. like buy other tickets

 

the bottom lines here is :

she either allowed you to use the ticket [whereby she has never read the terms and conditions, so no excuse there!]

or

you took and used it without her permission [ which is theft] - could get even more serious.......

 

i'd have to rely upon the transport guys for the answer to IF you could reclaim the 'un-used' days

of her ticket if she does get it back...

 

however..less of the bad stuff...

 

IF this is the ONLY time this has happened

then

with all probability you/wife MIGHT get a letter asking for YOUR comments on the issue.

 

your best bet here is to grovel and apologise offering to meet all admin costs and eqiv 'fines'

 

but await the letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX… I seem to be flying from being okay about this too mass panic… tis definitely the last time I offer to help the Mrs get to a patient quicker!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey we all make mistakes

 

await the letter, IF you two ever get one.

 

OK PITA shes had to pay for another ticket, but, that might well be the end of it.

 

its VERY diff to say.

 

i'd await comments from the transport guys

 

they know their stuff better than us.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

[you took and used it without her permission [ which is theft] - could get even more serious.......

 

 

dx

 

Do love the idea that I could steal something bought on the joint account so technically half mine already… guess that's not a water tight argument though.

 

Will do as suggested and wait for the letter and be as nice as possible… which might mean muzzling the missus as she was on the warpath when I got home. But then she is the one who has paid FGW £1000s over ten years only for this one mistake to land us in it this deep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF you get and write a letter

 

I would suggest you browse a few threads here for the type of content you need to include

whatever you do DONT WAFFLE

 

and for pity sake don't make comments like above.!

 

the fact that shes used the train for XXXXyrs and spent XXXX money is no excuse

for not reading the terms and condition & byelaws over all that time.

 

sad fact .. but very important!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do love the idea that I could steal something bought on the joint account so technically half mine already… guess that's not a water tight argument though.

 

Will do as suggested and wait for the letter and be as nice as possible… which might mean muzzling the missus as she was on the warpath when I got home. But then she is the one who has paid FGW £1000s over ten years only for this one mistake to land us in it this deep.

 

Thing is the season ticket is the property of the TOC, not your wife, nor you and your wife jointly.

One of the conditions of the season ticket is that it must be given ('delivered up') to an authorised member of rail staff on demand.

So, it matters not (in terms of ownership) which account it was paid for from .

 

Another of the conditions of the card is that it is non-transferable.

 

Case law also exists that establishes that although a fare was previously paid, YOUR fare wasn't paid by the use of your wife's season (the case of Browning & Floyd, where a husband used his wife's season ticket .....)

Link to post
Share on other sites
[you took and used it without her permission [ which is theft] - could get even more serious.......

dx

 

Do love the idea that I could steal something bought on the joint account so technically half mine already… guess that's not a water tight argument though.

 

Will do as suggested and wait for the letter and be as nice as possible… which might mean muzzling the missus as she was on the warpath when I got home. But then she is the one who has paid FGW £1000s over ten years only for this one mistake to land us in it this deep.

 

 

 

 

You are right, it is not a water tight argument and as others have pointed out most of the issues I shall not go into a long explanation of legal precedents and the various actions that are possible

 

Whilst your wife may have paid for the ticket from a joint account to which you both contribute, the terms of issue of all season tickets make clear that they are only valid for use by the holder named and depicted on the corresponding numbered photo identity card.

 

No, sending them a cheque for the fare is not likely to be accepted

 

You should wait for the letter from the TOC and as soon as you get it you will have the unique reference allocated to your case and who is handling it. You should then write a truthful reply, sticking to facts and expressing remorse and ask if the TOC will consider allowing the matter to be resolved administratively in order to protect your name.

 

They may well say no, but it is the best chance that you have of avoiding a costly penalty imposed by a Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Owen.

 

I'm sorry to hear you've been landed with this problem. Nothing to add to the advice above, but once you get their letter, assuming you do hear, come back here with a draft letter and we'll help you with it.

 

Or continue asking questions. :)

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Most monthly travel tickets are non transferable, so the person who uses another persons ticket, would be travelling effectively without a ticket. So I would have thought that they should have just issued you with a penalty fare ticket and told you not to use your wifes ticket again.

Unfortunately it's potentially a lot more serious than that, as using another person's ticket points quite easily to fare evasion as long as it's not a Pay as you go Oyster card, which is transferable (would the fare that's gone unpaid ever have been paid if the person wasn't challenged? No, more than likely not). That being the case, it's arguably not appropriate to issue a Penalty Fare in the first place, and progress the matter straight to their prosecutions dept.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...