Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ruthbridge chasing a debt that is not mine


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3744 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This originates from Cabot Financial who tried to via CCS Collections to obtain £875 on their behalf, no client was listed.

 

I wrote back making it very clear that I have no outstanding debts that have not been serviced

and that if the alleged debt was mine which I know it is not then please provide the proof.

 

After a couple of letters exchanged they admitted that it was an electronic request and they had not provided any paperwork.

 

Now I have Ruthbridge on the case after £2625.70p owed to the Bank of Scotland??

 

I have never had any dealing financial or otherwise with the BoS or any associated company.

 

Having read the background to Cabot Financial and Ruthbridge it seems both could best be described as chancers who chase statute barred debts

and do have a habit of chasing anyone who might fit the bill to get some money.

 

Is there anything I can do get these vultures to go away permanently?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try with a CCA Request... See if they have it...

You can usually fox them out with this.... I also wonder if they have traced the wrong individual

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had something similar with Robinson Way over an address in Surrey that I never had any connection with.

 

They even had the cheek to send a doorstep collector round who I promptly had removed by the local community police officer!

 

Since then, December 2012 I have had no further correspondence or visits from them.

 

I personally believe that someone with the same or similar name to me owes on old debts

and these have been purchased and are now being pursued.

 

I know the debts will be statue barred as I wrote a letter to occupants of the address who confirmed that they had been resident for over 7 years

and had received mail from DCA's which that they have returned to sender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly

 

check your credit file ensure no-one has taken out credit in your name.

 

if that's clear

quite honestly i'd not be sending anything

 

just encourages them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ruthbridge is well known for being at the lowest point in the murky depths of the debt collection industry.

What ever you do do not be drawn into lengthy correspondence may I suggest the following letter that has seen them off many times in the past.

 

For the personal attention of :

 

Mr Emmanual Amissah

Managing Director

Ruthbridge Ltd.,

 

 

Date:xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Ref: use theirs.

 

Re: Notice of Disassociation and Repudiation of Liability.

 

Dear Mr Amissah,

 

I refer you to recent correspondence from Ruthbridge Ltd., in relation to an alleged debt for £xxxx.xxx supposedly originating from an account with BOS, please take note I am not now nor ever have been a customer of BOS or any company in that group.

 

Therefore I do not acknowledge and debt to Ruthbridge Ltd., or any company it may claim to reperesnt.

 

For clarification and the avoidance of any misunderstanding please take careful note of the following points.

 

1. I am not now nor have I ever been a customer of any company of the BOS group.

 

2.Clearly Ruthbridge are pursuing me for this alleged debt without being sure that I am the debtor that owes the alleged debt, a breach of the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection

Section 3.9 ( a), (i) and (j) are relevant to this matter.

 

3.I require Ruthbridge Ltd., to cease processing all data relating to me and to remove it from all records ho so ever held.

 

4. Ruthbridge Ltd. WILL confirm in writing that it has complied with the above within 7 working days from the date heron.

 

5. Any further contact from Ruthbridge Ltd., other than that required above will be considered harassment and suitable action will be taken.

 

 

Yours etc.

 

 

Send by recorded / signed for post and check delivery date.

 

Please be aware that often this company does not reply, but are never heard from again.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree as regards sending nothing to Ruthbridge, there's no need. However, I do believe it is important to report matters like this to the regulators. Complaints to them constitute a vital component to the aim of controlling excesses in the debt collection cesspit and getting the worst offenders shut down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having dealt with Ruthbridge many times in the past it is my opinion that to leave this alone would lead to more pressure on the OP.

Stop them now.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having dealt with Ruthbridge many times in the past it is my opinion that to leave this alone would lead to more pressure on the OP.

Stop them now.

 

I agree, as with reporting any form of harrassment/unwanted behaviour you have to show you have asked them to stop if you want any action taken or else it can be deemed that they were unaware that they were doing anything wrong because as far a they are concerned they are chasing the right person

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sent another letter that arrived today so

 

I've copied Brigs suggested letter and posted it recorded delivery.

 

I have also made a complaint to the FSA and have spoken to my our local village bobby

who said if they carry on he can investigate and probably get a harrassment order placed on them!

 

There's no pressure on me as I seem to have been fending off these clowns for over 10 years now.

 

Whoever my alleged name sake is who ran up these debts I'd like to slap about!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arrived home from work to find a letter from Ruthbridge

stating that the account has been returned to Cabot.

 

AS this is the second Cabot have tried to pursue me for a debt that is not mine

 

I have spoken to our local rozzer,

 

who in turn will have a chat with his duty inspector to see if some sort of threat from them about harassment

 

can be made as I have suffered "vexatious door step visits" from collectors :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As said before ignoring firms like Ruthbridge is futile it pays to be firm, stand up to then with a firm letter in response to their threats and they can be beaten.

 

 

Lets hope Cabot will drop this now.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its worked with CCS, and also Robbers Way. Those clowns haven't contacted me in over 14 months after I threatened to send a dossier to the OFT. I have never believed in ignoring any of this lot. The course of action is to go on the attack and they invariably turn and run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...