over 6 years

[moses]

Thanks for that yep it's very similar to Wilkins' just left out the non compliance bit.

 

Can I ask -do I send draft directions with my AQ? I'm just claiming for 2 years prior to 2000 as they have paid out for the last 6 years

 

thanks

[mcuth]

Can I ask -do I send draft directions with my AQ?

 

Yup - have a look at:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

&

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html

 

 

Cheers

 

Michael

[moses]

thanks do I not have to modify the draft order? & is it OK to type out & attach the section G notes as it will be a bit squashed otherwise?

 

Sorry hopeless at filling in forms!

[moses]

right!

 

Am sending AQ back with the above mentioned section"G" attached

 

Also sending the Draft order for Directions from the template library

 

Just posting the Halifax defence just in case I should be answering number 7 in particular

 

5. The Particulars of Claim state that the Claimant's claim is based on contract and as such section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980 applies. Section 5 states that an action founded on simple contract cannot be brought after the expiration of 6 years from the date on which the cause of action accured,and accordingly, the Defendant submits that the balance of the Claimant's claim in the sum of £1629.37 (relating to charges applied to the account between 30 April 1998 and 31 December1999) is statute bared.

 

6. It is therefore denied that the Defendant is liable to the Claimant for the sum of £1629.37 or for any other sum.

 

7. On the basis of matters pleaded above, the defendant contends that the Claimant has no reasonable grounds for proceeding with the claim. The Defendant respectfully requests that the court gives due consideration to whether the remainder of the Claim in the sum of £1629.37 should be "struck out" pursuant to CPR Part 3.4(2)(a) and the Practice Direction which supplements CPR Part 3.4

 

Am I right or should I include more detail?

[cameragirl]

Hey guys!

Long time i know but things have been a bit fraught in the world of Blue!

Anyway, after my 40 day letter i have today (the 40th day as it happens!) received a sash of statements as requested from BoS, however i asked for the past 6 years as advised but i have received atatements from April 2004 up to March 2007!! What do i do now please, help required here folks!!!!

Thanks

Blue xx

[moses]

bueller......

 

bueller...........

 

bueller.............

 

anyone???????????????????

[un1boy]

Hey guys!

Long time i know but things have been a bit fraught in the world of Blue!

Anyway, after my 40 day letter i have today (the 40th day as it happens!) received a sash of statements as requested from BoS, however i asked for the past 6 years as advised but i have received atatements from April 2004 up to March 2007!! What do i do now please, help required here folks!!!!

 

Hey, good to have u back

 

 

Take a look here hun:

 

Data Protection Act - Non-Compliance - Template Letters(

[un1boy]

right!

 

Am sending AQ back with the above mentioned section"G" attached

 

Also sending the Draft order for Directions from the template library

 

Just posting the Halifax defence just in case I should be answering number 7 in particular

 

5. The Particulars of Claim state that the Claimant's claim is based on contract and as such section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980 applies. Section 5 states that an action founded on simple contract cannot be brought after the expiration of 6 years from the date on which the cause of action accured,and accordingly, the Defendant submits that the balance of the Claimant's claim in the sum of £1629.37 (relating to charges applied to the account between 30 April 1998 and 31 December1999) is statute bared.

 

6. It is therefore denied that the Defendant is liable to the Claimant for the sum of £1629.37 or for any other sum.

 

7. On the basis of matters pleaded above, the defendant contends that the Claimant has no reasonable grounds for proceeding with the claim. The Defendant respectfully requests that the court gives due consideration to whether the remainder of the Claim in the sum of £1629.37 should be "struck out" pursuant to CPR Part 3.4(2)(a) and the Practice Direction which supplements CPR Part 3.4

 

Am I right or should I include more detail?

 

I'm not ignoring u fella, I'm just not sure - I think you'll be ok though!

[moses]

cheers!

[mcuth]

thanks do I not have to modify the draft order? & is it OK to type out & attach the section G notes as it will be a bit squashed otherwise?

 

Sorry hopeless at filling in forms!

 

The draft order should be on a separate page anyway. The guidelines for completing an allocation questionnaire (supplied with the AQ) say "Use a separate sheet if you need more space for your answers marking clearly which section the information refers to. You should write the claim number on it, and any other documents you send with your allocation questionnaire. Please ensure they are firmly attached to it"

 

I find it much easier to use the downloadable forms from the HMCS website (N149, N150) and type the detail into them.

 

You don't need to reply to the Defence in great detail on the AQ itself, but if you want to do a full reply to defence, you'll need to submit it with the AQ, no later.

 

Cheers

 

Michael

[cameragirl]

thanks for that huny!

Am ready and armed now!!!

Blue xx

[WILKINSS208]

if you PM me, I will send you what I sent with AQ as Ive just won my claim for charges 1991-2006 with Halifax. I will help anyone, as I gained wonderful advice to help me

[moses]

thanks guys - have been laid up with gastric flu for a couple of days but back at the ol' laptop again!

[moses]

many thanks wilks:)