Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TFL prosecution!!!! - ** SETTLED BEFORE COURT **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3649 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello can one of the transport guys please help me with my situation!!

 

I was caught on 12 december 2013 using my friends student oyster card, and was caught. I received a letter yesterday saying that 'they may prosecute me'.

 

I have decided to write an apologetical letter and asking for an out of court settlement. I Have not been using the card regularly, i would say i have used it twice, prior to that i have been using my student oyster(i regret for being ignorant of tfl laws and fully understand where tfl are coming from). Is it possible they could check that.

 

And the lady who took my details only cautioned me after i signed her notebook, the caution was something like 'you are not under arrest...and you don't have to stay with me'. How relevant is this!!

 

PLease need replys ASAP!!!

Edited by honeybee13
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello there.

 

Please could you tell us what the TfL letter says please? I should help us to advise you if you type their letter up here without any identifying information.

 

Have you sent the letter yet or are you looking for advice on what to say?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello this is what the letter said, I haven't replied yet!!

 

I received a letter from TFL asking me to make any comments regarding the incident that took place.

 

TFL only refers to

"an incident took place at Borough road station whereby you were spoken to by a member of London Underground staff regarding your train journey and the associated fare.

 

 

The facts of this incidents are now being considered and I must advise you that legal proceedings may be initiated against you regarding this matter in accordance with the LU prosecution policy".

 

I am then invited to make any comments but I do not have to.

 

 

However, not responding might harm my defense if I later want to rely on it in court and am being advised that this will be used as evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that.

 

What you need to say is beyond my knowledge, but I hope some of the transport guys will be along over the weekend. We're all volunteers here, so you may need to bear with us for a short while until people get here.

 

When do you need to reply by?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thanks for getting back. I have to reply within 10 days!! I am going to admit guilt and write a letter saying iam sorry....

will wait for you guys to reply!!

 

Thank you for this. I think you're on the right track and are taking the right attitude. :) I think you also might also want to promise to abide by the rules in future and ask if they will allow you to reimburse the unpaid fares and TfL's reasonable expenses to avoid going to court, but I'll let the forum experts tell you more about what to write.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you intend to face-up to your own error of judgement, which in my book is always a good idea, you are on the right track as HB says.

 

You might like to say that you very much regret your error of judgment, offer a sincere apology to the company and staff concerned, undertake not to repeat the offence and ask if they will allow you to make payment of the fare and any reasonable costs that they have incurred in dealing with your misdemeanour.

 

Be aware that they can say no and may proceed to pursue the action, but at this stage this is the best you can do in writing to them promptly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'If you intend to face-up to your own error of judgement, which in my book is always a good idea, you are on the right track as HB says.

 

You might like to say that you very much regret your error of judgment, offer a sincere apology to the company and staff concerned, undertake not to repeat the offence and ask if they will allow you to make payment of the fare and any reasonable costs that they have incurred in dealing with your misdemeanour.

 

Be aware that they can say no and may proceed to pursue the action, but at this stage this is the best you can do in writing to them promptly'.

 

Thank you for your advice, I do intent to own up. All i can do is write a letter with great sincerity and apologise. If it fails then I am ready to face the consequences.

 

Can you also suggest something about the caution mentioned in questions!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The P.A.C.E Caution does exactly 'what it says on the tin' as it were,

 

It warns you that, when asked to answer a question, you are not obliged to do so, but, if you do answer the question and if you do not mention at that time an excuse or reason for your action, then you may not be able to rely on that explanation as a defence if the allegation proceeds to a Court hearing.

 

Magistrates may be allowed to draw inference from your silence

 

The Criminal Justice Act (1967) directs Courts to consider 'intent' by inference from all of the evidence available.

 

It is the observed actions of a passenger, and the statements that they might make, which can demonstrate 'intent to avoid payment' if they have not previously paid their correct fare

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I understand what P.A.C.E is,. It is only after i signed her little notebook that she cautioned me and said whatever i said would be used as evidence and let me go. Is this normal!!! Because after asking your name and address then they caution you right??

 

Just want to clarify this.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not unusual for a good inspector to ask for a name and address and a sample signature at the time of any pre-caution notes.

 

The inspector's notebook should show what time you were cautioned and the questions that she asked you along with your answers after that point at the end of which, s/he should read the notes aloud whilst allowing you to see what was written. If these notes are agreed as accurate then the inspector will offer the opportunity to sign the record and a further note of the time will be recorded.

at that point.

 

There is no obligation on you to do so, but if the opportunity to sign is declined, the inspector should make a note to that effect and if a further member of staff is present, should obtain a signature to the effect that opportunity was offered and declined.

 

Sometimes an inspector might ask for confirmation of name and address after caution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thanks for getting back, this is what happened to me.

 

I got caught:

1. Asked my name and address, i showed my drivers ID. Noted downn (she also took my oyster card details)

2. Then the questions where put forth.

3.Then she said do you wanna read it, I just wanted to go from there asap so said NO.

4. Then she just asked me to sign it and I did.

5.Then the caution came like 'you are not under arrest....you don't have to remain with us'.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

If you only used the card twice, I think it's very unlikely you'll go to prison. As far as I know, nobody from this forum has been sent to prison for fare evasion. Try not to worry. :)

 

HB

 

RRA 1889. S5(3)

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/52-53/57/section/5

 

The usual statute used for "intent to avoid their fare".

 

If found guilty (by plea or verdict) a prison sentence is only a possibility for a second (or other subsequent) offence.

You cannot be sentenced to prison for a first offence (leaving aside the scenario of deliberately not paying a fine ......)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hello Guys

 

Just a quick update...i just recieved a summons and they are pursuing me with this act, 'The summons says contrary to S.5 (3) (a) of the regulation of railways act 1989 as amended by section 84 (2) of the transport act 1982 and section 18 of the British railways act 1970.' dont know wat to do..I really dont want a criminal record...i have apolagised and agreed to pay administrative costs...is it still possible to get a settlement out of court...and if so whom should i speak to..

 

Please help!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is your opportunity to... contact them again in exactly the same spirit as you have done already, perhaps emphasising the damage to your future career etc (if that's actually true). After all, it's never too late, up to and including the steps of the court.

 

This time they might consider your request, as it is now at the 'proper' time, now you (and they) know what you are being charged with; although

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

There's nothing to stop you continuing to negotiate. I think you would ring the person who wrote to you, but hopefully someone with a bit more expertise will confirm that and suggest what you might say.

 

What is the court date please?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...