Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MKDP, Barclaycard and me.


eiggy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3717 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I have a second BC debt being collected by MKDP,

it's for £2,500 and is not SB.

I made a CCA request during summer last year and followed that with a failed CCA letter.

 

This week my failed CCA request letter has been answered with a few pages of T&C's and some copy statements from BC.

 

MKDP state that I am liable for the debt and they will now resume collection activity.

There is nothing with either mine or BC's signature,

even a letter they included supposedly from BC responding to my CCA request wasn't signed

and looked a bit suspect, was dated June 2013!

 

I was wondering what I should do next?

From what I understand it's not enforceable as there's nothing signed,

I want to send the failed letter again but I don't think the wording would suit this case

and don't want to come across as if I don't know what I'm doing.

 

Thanks for any suggestions on my next move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them.

 

They'll threaten you with county court probably. They might even claim if they think you'll ignore it with the hope they'll get a judgement by default.

 

 

Just keep an eye on your mail.

 

You've got a complete defence.

 

Have a scoot around and look at other barclaycard threads. They're notorious for losing/not retaining paperwork.

 

hey presto.

Edited by slick132
tidied layout
Link to post
Share on other sites

that's all you'll get from BC is T&C's

 

how old is this debt

 

is it on your CRA file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BC sold it for a reason

 

you need to sar BC and find out if you have PENALTY charges or PPI to reclaim.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defaulted in 2010, its on my CRA file and MKDP are the owners.

 

There was old BC duplicate data on there but I complained about the duplication and had the old BC data removed.

 

I've made a SAR to BC in December and got back my statements along with a signed copy of my application made in 2004.

 

There are 15 charges of £12,

the first in Nov 09 and the last in Jul 10.

 

I found a link on here back in December and entered the figures into a spread sheet,

 

I'm really not sure if what I done was right as it said the total claim is £1.055.05?

 

Could that be true?

 

I've attached a photo of the xls.

 

I've done my homework to the point that I feel like I'm chasing my tail.

 

Assuming I'm correct, they can't successfully win judgement at the CC if there's no signed CCA?

 

I don't want to just ignore MKDP as I feel I might have a case to stand my ground but I'm not 100% sure.

 

I want to reply but I don't know what I should say to be affective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pdf the attachments.

 

eitherway that's all you get out of a BC CCA request 9/10

 

with the signed application in 2005 on file

 

and the usual T&C's only [were these from 2004?]

 

you need to keep your eye out

 

as in MY opinion

with the clear financial link

that's all they'll need in court.

 

no saying they WILL

 

attach your xls file directly but remove you details

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eiggy,

 

From what I can see of the tiny jpeg of the spready, your figures look right. The interest will be far greater than the charges themselves because of the effect of compound interest on older charges.

 

If you pursue the refund of charges direct from BC, they may repurchase the a/c from MKDP so as to set off the refund against the o/s balance. If they don't, BC would be obliged to refund direct to you.

 

Re DX's comments about the possible enforceability of the a/c with court action, you have a better chance because of when the a/c was opened, ie 2004. But it would always come down to a judge's view on the day.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I'm attaching the pages sent to my by MKDP. As to what date, there is no other date contained in the T&C's sent by MKDP. I can only refer to the date contained in the header of pages 7/8, a date that's not applicable to any of my correspondence and looks like a faxs header?

Link to post
Share on other sites

**you can post up images/letters by this method immediately..you don't need 10 posts**

.

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

.

************************* ************************* *******

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

************************* ************************* ***********

.

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

or

use www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though dont use full bank names or CAG in the title

i'e Default notice DD-mm-yyyy TSB

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

...

YOU DONT have to put a link to the attachment in the msg box..just upload it ..job done

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eiggy and your pdf's seem fine.

 

Interesting that the default or penalty chgs referred to in pdf #6 show £12 as the fee. I think they would have been higher in 2004 because the OFT had not then set the ceiling of £12 on penalty chgs.

 

Just a thought but was there any PPI on this a/c that you could also reclaim to reduce the balance.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep wrong

 

£12 didn't come in till late 2006

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I was to sue BC for the charges would that stop MKDP from chasing the debt? Even if BC didn't buy it back?

 

It should certainly hold MKDP off pending settlement of the issue as this would place the a/c in clear dispute. After any refund is made, I would expect MKDP to resume collection activity.

 

See this thread for guidance, making notes as you go - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?368541-trancyb-vs-Barclaycard

 

There are also examples of BC **Compound Interest** wins in the Barclays Successes forum - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?97-Barclays-BCard-and-Woolwich-successes

 

Research properly before proceeding with the claim, to make sure you get it right.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, my calculations were wrong. Charges are £216 and compound interest is £420 using 24.9%. The debt is £2,500.

 

I'm worried about CC action so I'm thinking about reclaiming and putting my account into dispute with the DCA in the hope BC will buy it back. Is that wise? Who's the better evil?

 

If I do, will this count as acknowledging the debt and reset the SB clock or have I already done that by making the CCA request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eiggy,

 

Experience suggests BC will only buy the debt back from the DCA IF you take court action to recover chgs.

 

If you want the chgs and int't back, you will almost certainly have to take court action.

 

I do not see that you'll reset the SB clock, as long as you DON'T :-

 

1. Acknowledge the debt in writing.

 

2. Agree in writing to a set off of a refund against the alleged debt.

 

An alternative strategy would be to leave the a/c alone and claim back penalty charges as a counterclaim IF the DCA takes court recovery action.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...