Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

home visit - ** placed in Support Group without assessment **


grecian
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3721 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

on jan 4th i recieved a letter of atos for assesment on the 9th jan, letter dated 18th dec.

6th of jan i rang atos requesting a home visit.said i needed a fax o my dr to confirm this.

7th jan dr surgery rang atos and said a fax will be sent in a few days and they told her they have canceled my 9th jan appointment.

8th jan dr rings me and said they have sent a fax outlining my disabilities and not to worry.

9th jan i get letter of atos for assement in exeter 28th jan. dated 7th jan. irang atos outlining the above, lady said i must atend 28th appt.i said how can you send a appt before you have read the fax. i then got o its just arrived today. she said to me that they will request my file back from exeter and asses again and they will be in contact with me. i said so i dont have to go to exeter on the 28th, she said no i dont.

my worry is that are atos to be trusted on this as we have all read the horror stories. and ive got a funny feeling i will recive a letter benefits stopped failure to attend assesment on the 28th. is there anything else i can do. thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go by what they have sent you so far. That way you cover your back if they try any funny business.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats good advice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

:grecian:

 

In my experience Atos are most definitely not to be trusted on this. Not even via a phone call on 27 January, unless you've a facility to record the call. The 28 January appointment before they'd read the fax from your doctor was their way of cancelling the 9 January appointment. :???: Aren't we all. Unfortunately they've also a nasty habit of leaving the rearranged appointments open, then issuing 'failure to attend' letters.

 

What I'm going to say next is an awful faff, which shouldn't be necessary, but it's easier than a disputed 'failure to attend'. If you've not received anything in writing from Atos by say 20 January, send an electronic mail or snail mail letter via recorded delivery to Atos, outlining the situation and asking for confirmation of the cancellation. Keep a copy and get a copy of the fax ready to send to Jobcentreplus if there's an allegation of 'failure to attend'.

 

Atos get the final say so about home visits and if they agree one you could be waiting quite a while. Seems they've only got one doctor to do home visits in the South West!

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Margret

Thanks for your reply,it is appreciated. I will do as you suggested.

Also i think you are right about only one dr for the South West, as a friend of ours sent his esa50 in august 2012, had home visit july 2013 and is still waiting for a decision .Beggers belief.

Once again many thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

quick update.

On the 24th jan i recieved letter saying, as received more information we no longer need you

to come for assessment.

Today i received a letter from the dwp putting me in the support group.

I would like to thank everybody on this forum for their advice and help with dealing with atos, your help is invaluable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...