Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
    • If everyone who wanted or needed a permit could get one easily how would PCM make any money?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Head Gasket issue - used car


Adojay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3700 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Am trying to get opinions from members on the car issue am currently having. On 14th December 2013, I bought 2003 reg Peugeot 307 1.6L with 101,200 miles on the clock for £1,000 from a car dealer. I saw the car on Autotrader. It fitted what I wanted in terms of look and price. I test drove the car and was satisfied with the drive. I paid with my credit card and took car home. The car came with 3 months warranty for maximum repair worth £200 with Halfords. For me this was only an extra, as I would still have bought the car even if it didn't come with any warranty.

 

On the 28th of December, on a very cold morning I started the car but it didn't start as smoothly as it used to. It then gave me Catalyst converter and anti-pollution fault. When it started it was misfiring, but everything returned to normal when the car was warm enough. I googled the issue and found it was a common issue with Peugeot cars. I had planned fixing the problem myself as soon as I had the time to do so.

 

On 3rd January 2014, another cold morning, I started the car but it won't start. I called AA, and the rep examined the car and concluded that the head gasket was probably the issue and advised I take it back to the trader, as it had warranty on it. I decided not to take it to the trader, but to take it to Halfords who are the authorised auto centre for the dealer. The guys diagnosed the issue and called me to say it was bad news. They confirmed the head gasket was gone, and that it would cost me £900 to repair. They said that it wasn't worth the effort, seeing that I only just bought the car (done 336 miles as at now), and for only £1000, and advised I go back to the car dealer to let them aware.

 

I have now written to the car dealer informing them of the incident, stating that under the Sale of Goods Act and in line with Reverse Burden of Proof, have asked them to either repair or replace the vehicle. The letter was sent today by Special Delivery.

 

I believe the dealer was aware of the problem before the car was sold to me. They told me at the time of purchase that car only arrived as part ex. From my experience, before car traders P/X cars, they thoroughly examine cars to ascertain if any underlying issues exist, and based on that arrive at a figure they are willing to P/X the car for. Anyway, that's by the way.

 

Considering the fact that it is still 3 weeks since car was purchased, I feel I have a case for the trader to repair or replace the car. I am not really interested in a refund unless it is absolutely the last resort. I just want the head gasket replaced.

 

Any advise from members?

 

 

Adojay

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't a head gasket fault, it's a No 4 injector fault, number four being at the front (by the engine pulley) as opposed to most other manufacturers who call it No1. It's a classic miss diagnosis by a bunch of Muppets.

 

Fix costs about £25 plus half an hour labour. Root cause is water dripping though from the vent on the bonnet or the washer jet leaking. If the head gasket was changed it wouldn't fix the problem.

 

It's a well known problem around this mileage. I own a car with the same engine and have had to change this injector twice, both around the 100K and 200k mark but put this down to routine maintenance as the injectors have a finite life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't a head gasket fault, it's a No 4 injector fault, number four being at the front (by the engine pulley) as opposed to most other manufacturers who call it No1. It's a classic miss diagnosis by a bunch of Muppets.

 

Fix costs about £25 plus half an hour labour. Root cause is water dripping though from the vent on the bonnet or the washer jet leaking. If the head gasket was changed it wouldn't fix the problem.

 

It's a well known problem around this mileage. I own a car with the same engine and have had to change this injector twice, both around the 100K and 200k mark but put this down to routine maintenance as the injectors have a finite life.

 

Now I am confused. Honestly, am rubbish at car diagnosis except for the obvious faults. When the AA rep said head gasket was suspect, I took it with a pinch of salt until the Halfords mechs said they had confirmed it as well using two different systems. Anyway, the idea of Halfords was not mine but the choice of the dealer in line with the terms of the warranty. If they are in doubt, am happy for them to carry out another tests to confirm whether or not the issue was with the head gasket. I wish the issue was as Helios has described it. I am ready to fix my car myself. I have always bought older used cars but never had any issues anywhere near as serious in such a short period of time. Fingers crossed, I'll see how the trader progresses this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me what two systems they used?

 

One of the things with this engine is that the mapping of the cold start is not brilliant and because of this the trigger level that registers a code is not good. What's significant though is the post about the non starting when cold and the subsequent clearing of the issue when warm. If it was head gasket then it would be worse but in fact it would overheat.

 

The cat sensors are the biggest clue though and the way you describe the fault. It's a classic !

 

I'd suggest the best way forward for you would be to tell them to park the car outside and then start, let idle and I bet it will go down on 3 cylinders. Then get them to read the codes. It will show either the cat code, possibly no 2 sensor, or the injector 4 code. Then feed back the codes here or goofle them.

 

No way is this head gasket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks helios. I don't know which systems they used to diagnose the problem. They only called me in to inform me of the news. The best I can do is to take the car to my own tried and trusted mechanic to re-diagnose. I wouldn't want him to carry out any repair works until I have heard from the dealer, and know how they plan to progress it. Obviously, if it is confirmed fault is not head gasket, and subsequent fault is not covered by the warranty, I will go ahead and take it to my own mechanic to fix. I am seriously hoping it is not head gasket, as am not prepared for the wrangling to follow. Keeping fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd do just that. Take it to a mechanic you trust and ask him to read the fault codes. If the distance from Halfrauds to your mechanic is over 5 miles then you can probably safely rule out Head gasket failure as it would overheat big time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd do just that. Take it to a mechanic you trust and ask him to read the fault codes. If the distance from Halfrauds to your mechanic is over 5 miles then you can probably safely rule out Head gasket failure as it would overheat big time.

 

Talking about overheating, is that the only sign that head gasket is gone? This is because I've not noticed the car overheating as of yet. The only thing that happens is that car is sometimes hard to start under very cold condition, and when it does start it vibrates, and the engine management light comes up the dash indicating Catalytic converter and anti pollution faults. If I leave it for a while or stop and restart engine it disappears and car runs okay.

 

My mechanic is only 2 miles away from my local Halfords centre. As long as it is only for diagnosis, I'll take it there and ask him to read the fault codes for me. I wouldn't want him to do anything until we are certain of what the issue is.

 

Thanks helios for all your contribution.

Edited by Adojay
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, if the head gasket has gone it will overheat and very quickly. What happens in your case is that due to water ingress the injector shorts to permanently open and it squirts fuel in continuously. Because of the quantities it soon upsets the cat which tries to adjust the mixture so the car is running all over the place. Hence the cat code. I'm not sure why it doesn't record the injector fault. One way to get over it is to start the engine and keep it running at 1500rpm for about 5 mins. It'll be OK all day then. It's also sensitive to registering coil pack faults. Again, if you buy wisely they are cheap as chips as well (if chips could be considered cheap nowadays!). Don't use euro car parts if you can help it, use flea bay. Injectors and coil packs are colour coded and are not interchangeable.

Apart from these two items which are high time in service, if looked after and serviced regularly are bullet proof and uber reliable!

 

I expect Conniff will be along to discredit the engine shortly as it's French!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Helios, the long and short of it is that I should look at sourcing Peugeot 307 injector, coil pack or both?

 

Another thing I noticed is that the coolant keeps going down. Is that also a sign consistent with injector and coil pack failure? Or anything to do with head gasket?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps both for the reliability point of view.

 

Coolant loss is a factor of a head gasket failure but so are many other factors. This is why it's important to get a proper and thorough diagnosis.

 

Ask your mechanic to download the codes stored from the OBD 2 connector and also ask him to pressure test the system. He will need to do this at engine operating temperature and with the heater setting to full. 307's also have a habit I believe of the heater matrix leaking which is evidenced by wet floor mats and condensation on the inside of the screen. The rad is also prone to weeps as is aluminium alloy and can corrode. If you look at the rad and there are areas alongside the vertical black plastic sides which show more white "powder" then it's probably weeping.

A lot of this depends as well on the amount of coolant being lost. If it was the head gasket going then you would see a lot steam from the exhaust as well all the time as well as a misfire all the time, not one that clears when it's at it's normal operating temp.

 

Have you noticed any smell that could be described as "curry" like?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am afraid, I haven't noticed any smell whatsoever so far. I suppose the car needs proper diagnosis to ascertain what exactly is wrong. From your posts so far, it doesn't seem like a head gasket issue. I will ask my mechanic to carry out diagnosis on the car, and hope the dealer does the same as well so we can come to a quick and concise conclusion of what the real issue is.

 

helios, I cannot thank you enough for your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took my car to my mechanic this morning. I intentionally didn't give him any heads up on how far I had gone so far with any diagnosis. I just asked him to check what the issue was with the car. He told me the head gasket was the problem. He even went further to show me where water was leaking out from in the engine. It looks like a crack, and while I was revving the engine, he could see coolant leaking from there. He said that was why I always had to top up coolant every few miles of drive. He said he didn't need to use the computer to diagnose, unless he wasn't sure what the issue was.

 

Now I have same information from 3 different sources, AA, Halfords and my own mechanic. All concurring that the head gasket is the issue the car is having. I will now wait to hear from the dealer on how they want to progress it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good way to go Ado. Can you see a physical crack in the head? This is a very unusual failure mode as the engines a pretty bullet proof and if a head gasket has gone is usually an internal failure. It might go someway to explaining why it did not overheat. Be prepared though at some point for that no 4 injector fault as it's a classic and many get caught out that No 4 is at the front of the engine by the front pulley.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Having not heard back from the dealer, I decided to write to them again, this time threatening legal action if they do not get back to me within 7 days. Surprise, surprise, within 2 days of the last letter they have now written to me, asking I bring the car to their repair shop so their mechanic can take a look. I have now booked appointment to take the car to them by Tuesday next week. Hopefully, they will see what the issue is, and resolve it amicably. Fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks helios. I did not personally see water leaking from the top cylinder (if that's what it's called). While I revved the car, the mechanic was the one watching the water pressure. All he did was show me where the leak was escaping from. It's like a little crack. If I can, I will look for it and post.

 

Am happy the dealer has agreed to take a look. It would be interesting to see what their own mechanic make of the issue. All I need is solution. I have since continued to top coolant after only a few miles (25 - 30) trip despite the cold condition. Surely something must be responsible. What intrigues me is the statement in their letter that head gasket issues are normal with cars of that age (10 years) and mileage (101,100). I think it's more to do with how one looks after one's car. I normally buy cars well over 10 years, and have never had this kind of issue. If the issue is truly head gasket, I believe the car dealer was well aware of it when they took the car as p/x. That's my own opinion though. Truth is why would I have to pay for a car with bad head gasket? I think it's not just right.

 

I hope the dealer can sort the issue for me. If not, I will pursue my credit card provider for a refund, citing car not fit for purpose. Am hoping it won't get to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update on this thread. Dealer was not helpful. He asked me to take car to their mechanic (close relations I must add), mechanic told me he could find nothing, except for blockage in the hose that connects into the head gasket. He said he would clear that up, and hopefully it would clear the sludge that appears when the oil cap is opened. I made him understand that was not why I am having issues with the car. As a matter of fact, that was the first time I had even noticed the sludge was building up when the oil cap is opened. He made a note of my coolant level, and asked me to drive it for the day and return car next day so he can ascertain how much coolant is lost. Coolant level was at max, and I returned the car with the level below minimum after doing 15 miles. Still, the dealer called me to say there was nothing wrong with the car. He even went further to try to bully and harass me into getting scared, insisting I should go to court if I wanted.

 

Well, I wasn't going to go to court anyway. I simply informed my credit card provider about everything, providing them with all the correspondence between dealer and myself. I told them I was claiming refund under section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act. They told me to stop further communication with dealer, saying they would now deal directly with them. They wrote to dealer, but after one month heard nothing back from them. They have now offered me full refund of my money, under condition that I scrap the car and send them the receipt so they can deduct whatever value I am able to scrap it for from the value they owe to me. I am happy to scrap the car, but not sure how to progress it. It would be painful to me that a car worth about £1,000 at least, that would have been repaired for £400 max would be scrapped for peanuts. I would have loved to fix the car and keep it, but not sure about the legality of such an action.

 

Any ideas of how to deal with the situation?

 

Ideas are welcome.

 

Adojay

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...