Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK CC debt - living mainland europe


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Very much hope that some of the more experienced members may be able to offer some advice.

 

The situation concerns a UK CC debt.

 

Unfortunately due to serious change in circumstances this account fell into arrears of around 12,000.

 

Prior to this there was a sucessful claim for miselling of PPI.

 

Went down the CCA route using a specialist company and the cc provider was found to be in breach and the account was deemed unenforceable. That was almost four years ago and since then no further contact has been attempted by the original cc provider.

 

The last payment of any kind was made almost five years ago.

 

Have recently received a letter, delivered to our old address, from a DCA asking for full payment. Suspect debt has been sold to this DCA and that they are trying it on before the six year period is up.

 

Have read that no CCJ can be issued if not resident in the UK and if the agreement is in dispute.

 

Would very much appreciate the thoughts and opinions of those people with more experience of these matters to know exactly what to do for the best. Have not replied to DCA's letter and have not provided new address at this time.

 

Many thanks in advance for your comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your not planning to come back to the UK, have no assets here then just forget it and enjoy your life where your not being financially raped by an uncaring selfish regime (sorry Government)!

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would help you, if UK creditors/debt owners knew you were resident abroad. They should not then get a sneaky CCJ, which would just extend the period this debt could be enforced. If they get a CCJ using your last known UK address, as soon as you found out about it you would have to then go through the hassle of getting it set aside.

 

If you sent them proof you were resident abroad, I suspect that they will quickly get shot of the debt, rather than try to enforce it where you live using a European Enforcement Order (EEO). The EEO is for uncontested debts and it would be no good to them, if you contested it and won. They would then still be stuck with a debt they can't enforce , but having incurred costs.

 

Up to you, but if I were in this position, I would advise them of being resident abroad. Yes a little bit of hassle with debt collection letters, but less hassle than dealing with a possible CCJ set aside, which would also cost you to do.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your feedback.

 

Original cc providers have had our address over here for last ten years. This address has obviously been passed on to the DCA who sent the letter. But this went to our old address over here. Don't really want to give new address.

 

May consider moving back to the UK one day but not before the six year period has passed.

 

Think that the DCA has acquired a number of debts and is trying it on. Can't imagine for one moment that the original cc provider would inform the DCA that they had been found to be in breach and that the case had been found to be unenforceable.

 

Would appreciate your further feedback and suggested action to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could just send them a letter just stating that you disputed this account 4 years ago with the original creditor who agreed that it was unenforceable. Advise them that this being the case, you do not wish to receive any further communications about it and suggest that they refer it back to the original creditors. You could advise them that you are still a resident of x country, but have moved. If they want to send an email to confirm, you could just give them an email address. ( set up a new email with gmail or hotmail purely for debt issues).

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Unclebulgaria.

 

Have no concerns really over ccj as certainly not resident in the uk and have no assets or indeed a property there.

 

Would have thought that if that was a possibility the original cc provider would have gone down that route.

 

Do you imagine that the original provider would have disclosed their breach and the unenforceability to the DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do you imagine that the original provider would have disclosed their breach and the unenforceability to the DCA?

 

They are meant to, but it rarely ever happens.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi folks,

 

So sorry to revisit this issue but have had some recent developments concerning the original post.

 

Had not heard anything more from the DCA until recently when they tried to contact me by telephone. They received no response so left a message asking me to make contact quoting a certain reference. Needless to say I have not made contact and have no intention of doing so.

 

What are your thoughts on this matter and what course of action would you take, bearing in mind the details mentioned in previous posts.

 

Thank you in anticipation of your feedback.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them. If they manage to get you on the phone, they will try to ask identification questions. Just don't answer them and or admit to being the person they are seeking. Just say that they have the wrong number and put the phone down.

 

If they know you are abroad it should stop them applying for a sneeky CCJ. They may not bother to pay the cost of making a court claim using your last UK address, because if they note you have been abroad for awhile, they may not think that you are intending to return to the UK.

 

So no action required.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As UB says above, refuse to go through their stupid security questions or just laugh & hang up.

 

Even though a computer dials the number & passes it to the next operator, a normal person with an ounce of common sense will know you are abroad because of the ring tone but we are talking about DCA employees here so these are not & never will be normal people.

 

Ignore & enjoy your life in a free Country.

 

Is this your landline or mobile the DCA is attempting to ring you on?

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the landline Stigman. The DCA have obviously done a search under my surname, but the entry they found is not in my name. Do you think they could persue this through the courts over here?

 

Possible, but unlikely. What tends to happen is that after a long period of time, it gets passed to a DCA in the country where you are resident or one that deals with mainland EU debts. But by the time they get around to this, it will be probably be statute barred and therefore not enforceable in court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply UB. I believe that the statute barred period should come into play early next year. If the DCA try to get arsey or pass it on to another DCA I will refer them to the fact that this case has already been deemed as unenforceable and refer them to the original dispute whilst at the same time asking them to prove it. What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply UB. I believe that the statute barred period should come into play early next year. If the DCA try to get arsey or pass it on to another DCA I will refer them to the fact that this case has already been deemed as unenforceable and refer them to the original dispute whilst at the same time asking them to prove it. What do you think?

 

Yes.

 

As you know DCA's rely on fear and anxiety. They only win, if you give into any harassment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

a quick update. Am still getting phone calls. Still ignoring them.

 

Quick question. This case was subject to a sucessful claim for mis-sold PPI through the financial ombudsman. What, if any, bearing will this have on this case?

 

Thanks in advance of your much appreciated responses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

a quick update. Am still getting phone calls. Still ignoring them.

 

Quick question. This case was subject to a sucessful claim for mis-sold PPI through the financial ombudsman. What, if any, bearing will this have on this case?

 

Thanks in advance of your much appreciated responses.

 

None. PPI is a separate issue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...