Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cash4phones - creditors meeting - 13th Jan Please retweet - https://cag.tw/tf7


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3011 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi guys How can I contact the liquidator and get a debt form I want to register as a creditor

 

Send an email to [email protected] asking for a form. As they've evidently completely full of male cow droppings, I wouldn't even bother any more.

 

Their assets are apparently £1200 worth of phones... 750 phones? Who managed to come up with that valuation? If two of those are my two then they are worth at least £180 on various other sites still so I don't get how they can say 750 of them are worth 1200 quid. Which phones do they have? A bunch of Nokia 5110 all worth less than £2 each? I doubt it. They're iPhones, my Note, other smart phones etc. Even my 4 year old phone is still worth at the very least £30 unless I bother selling on eBay where it'll get more than double that. Wish I had pawned them off on eBay now...

 

Director can't speak English but can comment in English on facebook...

 

Global market prices dropped, my arse. If they can't sell the thing on, send it back to the customer. It's not like they bought it from customers - they had free stock coming in, then "couldn't" sell them. Give them back then? I don't know, just seems somewhat obvious to me.

 

There's this question of how they have a huge loan to repay to another company, run by friends/ex directors or whatever it was.

 

Money laundering, fraud; liars. I've given up hoping for anything financial relating to my own phones and even given up expecting the UK law to do anything about it at all. If anything, it shows us just how easy it is to be a con artist and how little the Police, Insolvency, Action Fraud or anyone can and will do about it.

 

The only change for me is knowing now, as I already thought I did know, that you MUST Google EVERY site you have any financial dealings with, even and especially when things do seem like they're legit. To make things better my new phone was dropped by my kid yesterday so the screen's died. Don't have my old phones to just throw the SIM card in either, so I'm completely phoneless for the sec. Wonderful.

 

kk, rant over :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Their assets are apparently £1200 worth of phones... 750 phones? Who managed to come up with that valuation? If two of those are my two then they are worth at least £180 on various other sites still so I don't get how they can say 750 of them are worth 1200 quid. Which phones do they have? A bunch of Nokia 5110 all worth less than £2 each? I doubt it. They're iPhones, my Note, other smart phones etc. Even my 4 year old phone is still worth at the very least £30 unless I bother selling on eBay where it'll get more than double that. Wish I had pawned them off on eBay now...

 

Director can't speak English but can comment in English on facebook...

 

Global market prices dropped, my arse. If they can't sell the thing on, send it back to the customer. It's not like they bought it from customers - they had free stock coming in, then "couldn't" sell them. Give them back then? I don't know, just seems somewhat obvious to me.

 

There's this question of how they have a huge loan to repay to another company, run by friends/ex directors or whatever it was.

 

Money laundering, fraud; liars. I've given up hoping for anything financial relating to my own phones and even given up expecting the UK law to do anything about it at all. If anything, it shows us just how easy it is to be a con artist and how little the Police, Insolvency, Action Fraud or anyone can and will do about it.

 

The only change for me is knowing now, as I already thought I did know, that you MUST Google EVERY site you have any financial dealings with, even and especially when things do seem like they're legit. To make things better my new phone was dropped by my kid yesterday so the screen's died. Don't have my old phones to just throw the SIM card in either, so I'm completely phoneless for the sec. Wonderful.

 

kk, rant over :p

 

the fact that they have our phones and have not returned them surely means its theft and a criminal offence?? not sure about small print but there wasn't anything that suggested i entered into any contract with them that they haven't breached in regards to sending my phone and them paying out???

 

must be a way to nail them, even if i don't see my 180 quid or phone again i'd be happy to see them in prison!! the uk public are too often victims of these frauds as we're too trusting and accommodating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that we had better point out that there is no evidence of money-laundering or of criminality. However the circumstances, the behaviour of the directors, the lack of transparency certainly are the kinds of factors which might make many people consider these as possibilities. We are certainly are aware that certain investigations are in progress - so that clearly there are others who are very concerned by what has gone on.

 

Of course if we could locate Henchoz and Deepesh Tank as well as Vasant Kara - and if they were prepared to tell everyone the whole story then one might understand that there is some other explanation.

Also if Nearchos had decided to give a proper explanation - which he could easily have chosen to do - that also would have been reassuring.

 

If there are suspicions then these people have brought them upon themselves by their behaviour. No one should be surprised

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly, its not confirmed but very suspicious behaviour, considering this goes right back to when watchdog highlighted them on their show and no doubt before then, it seems more than just bad business management and bad luck that have created this situation, it "appears" a conscious attempt to mislead and con people until evidence is found to prove either way its still "suspicion only"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder

 

Exactly, if these guys come forward and explain what's happened then customers can form a clear opinion on facts rather then speculate as to what has happened. In the absence of them coming forward customers are entitled to have strong suspicions about why they have no phone, no money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received a email with the teport of the creditors meeting attached, i am so not happy about this whole situation as the dates and addresses and company names are not consistent, firstly they claimed that they moved registered offices to the Paddington address on 25/10/13 so why then did they sign for my phones at the Ringway address in December? And as for their financial information who in their right mind pays a junior administrator £40 per hour, this whole situation has got my blood boiling as its not the fact that they owe me £202 its the principal behind it, i have also taken out a CCJ which was obviously a waste of £25 :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK well here's how I see the current situation: There was no attempt by the insolvancy practitioner or liquidator to contact creditors before the meeting was called. To my mind that makes the initial creditors meeting flawed. We were unable to come up with the requisite 3 creditors at such short notice willing to sit con a creditors committee to oversee the liquidators investigations.

 

I have written to and asked the liquidator a number of questions so far and not yet had a response, therefore I am not confident this will be properly investigated by them. I would love to leave them to it but to what end? It seems to me the only option we have is to press for the chance to form a committee - if we are allowed to who else would be prepared to assist?

 

Forgot to mention that Radio 5 live may be doing a piece on Sunday morning, although I have no confirmation of this.

 

Edit:Sorry just heard they will not have time to feature this weekend, however depending on how this progresses might happen next weekend instead.

Edited by Apriumben
Updated info
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that it you notice any shortcomings in the procedure employed so far by CB then they should be informed that if these flaws are not remedied, that you will write to Trading Standards and also to their professional association

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I've had a email from the liquidator too!!

 

How much money is he charging them!! £7500

Seriously!!

 

Anyhow there's a bit the end you can fill in so we can let the liquidator know what he had been up too, if some one could write down everything for me I'll be happy and I'll happy to be part of a comittiee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I've had a email from the liquidator too!!

 

How much money is he charging them!! £7500

Seriously!!

 

Anyhow there's a bit the end you can fill in so we can let the liquidator know what he had been up too, if some one could write down everything for me I'll be happy and I'll happy to be part of a comittiee

 

Can you possibly post the content of your email on here? I would like to know what they are saying to other creditors as I have had no advice on the meeting myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you possibly post the content of your email on here? I would like to know what they are saying to other creditors as I have had no advice on the meeting myself.

 

Please be advised that that the company trading as cash4phones entered in to liquidation on the 13 January 2014 and I was appointed liquidator of the company by the shareholders and creditors. Please find enclosed the report on the meeting of creditors held on 13 January 2014.

 

It is my duty as Liquidator to investigate the actions/conduct of the directors and to make a report to the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State will then decide whether they have sufficient evidence to be able to issue proceedings under the Company Directors Disqualification Act.

 

I have invited all creditors of the company to provide me with any information they have on the conduct of the directors and I would ask you to provide to me any evidence you have on the directors conduct, alternatively you may provide all of your evidence directly to the Secretary of State.

 

My report is confidential to ensure that any litigation is not adversely affected should the Secretary of State decide to issue proceedings.

 

I would ask that you provide my name and address to any individuals who wish to make a claim in the liquidation or who wish to provide evidence in respect of the conduct of the director.

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Mansoor Mubarik

 

From [email protected]

 

Had this PDF attached: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1404231/Yemonia%20Limited%20Letter%20to%20Creditors%20Post%20Sec%2098%20Meeting.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just emailed you the full report

Actually, you emailed it to me - but I have forwarded it on.

Thanks very much.

 

Who is the lucky boy who is buying p the remaining stock of phones without any scrutiny or questions asked? Sale price circa £1200 - estimated realisable value - £5000. Nice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a good point was raised on another forum (there's plenty of fires burning on this subject around the internet!)

 

If we aren't likely to get phones back, we can assume its theft? and as a result we should (if we have the details) contact providers and have the IMEA blocked so that the phone can no longer be connected to a mobile network.

 

what do you guys think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got the box for my S3 somewhere so should have the number too, i feel that if i can't use it why should anyone else.

 

that'll rather reduce their 1700 quid estimate of the value of their assets to roundabout zero....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both of mine have been blocked by O2. I dug out the IMEI of one but the other I had no clue. The person at O2 managed to dig it out for me based on the phone model and a time frame that I gave.

 

So even if you don't know your IMEI, the phone company does. Try ringing them anyway to see if you can brick what is technically still your own phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe some important news here, just had these mail back from capital books.

 

 

"Please be advised that that the company trading as cash4phones entered in to liquidation on the 13 January 2014 and I was appointed liquidator of the company by the shareholders and creditors.

 

Find enclosed the report on the meeting of creditors held on 13 January 2014.

 

It is my duty as Liquidator to investigate the actions/conduct of the directors and to make a report to the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State will then decide whether they have sufficient evidence to be able to issue proceedings under the Company Directors Disqualification Act.

 

I have invited all creditors of the company to provide me with any information they have on the conduct of the directors and I would ask you to provide to me any evidence you have on the directors conduct, alternatively you may provide all of your evidence directly to the Secretary of State.

 

My report is confidential to ensure that any litigation is not adversely affected should the Secretary of State decide to issue proceedings.

 

I would ask that you provide my name and address to any individuals who wish to make a claim in the liquidation or who wish to provide evidence in respect of the conduct of the director.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Mansoor Mubarik."

 

looks like if enough of us reply with details they may take things further?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the phone's still sitting in a warehouse waiting to be sold, then trying to deactivate it using IMEI seems like a good shout and it will reduce their asset value...but personally I'd feel bad if it had already been sold to a poor kid in India, and then I got it switched off. I might be alone on that one!

In other news, I've been contacted by another IP who says it's too late to get an alternative IP to CB assigned but he will ensure that CB do their job or he'll have them struck off...and he knows that MM has had prior business dealings with this shower, so odds of him doing his job properly are slim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just spoke to Mandoor (Liquidator) and asked if there is no dividend to pay any class of creditors then what is going to happen to all the mobile phone that they have stolen?

 

Mandoor stated that as the liquidator he has to file a report within 6 months to the security of state and it will be up to the security of state to establish whether it is a civil or criminal act. They have had 800 complaints and he feels we have a strong public case. He encourages people to get in touch with him to fill the creditors forms or complaint letters of their mobile phones being stolen as the chairperson has not declared the mobile phones. He also mentioned that he will be investigating it and that this company could receive up to 300 a day!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...