Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Overpaid benefits - will I be charged with fraud?


Dali17
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3758 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope I am posting to the right section.

 

I have just realised I have been receiving benefits I should not have been since Aug 2012. I did not know, until reading a news story last night, that you are supposed to inform them when your savings go over £6000. I checked my bank account and it went over that in Aug 2012 and has been increasing ever since.

 

I get DLA for both myself and my daughter, carers allowance, ESA support component, housing benefit, child tax credit and child tax credit. All were applied for under advice from my support workers and daughter's social worker. I actually had to be pressured by them to claim DLA and and Carers Allowance as I felt bad about it. Mostly my support workers filled in the forms and I just signed them. I have phoned the CTC and CA people in the recent past to inform them of changes I knew I had to tell them about and knew would result in me getting less money, but was unaware there was a savings limit. I started receiving most of the above benefits in early 2012 which is where the money has come from.

 

I know I need to tell them about this but I don't know who to phone as I am on various benefits. I no longer have a support worker to help with this kind of thing. (They used to fill in all my forms and make phonecalls for me.). Do I have to phone each one separately or is there one place who will deal witb it all? When I do tell them, will it be treated as fraud even though it was not deliberate? How will they work out what I owe them, as I think my entitlement will have changed over time as my savings have increased? What happens if what I owe them is more than what I have? And what will happen to my benefits now?

 

I am extremely anxious and scared. This was NOT deliberate. I tried to phone my daughter's social worker today for advice (didn't know who else to phone) but just got her voicemail. The CAB helpline was too busy and I was told to phone back on Monday. I really don't know what to do. I don't want to go back to not having enough money for my daughter's transport to school or for her lunches. She has exams this year and has enough problems as it is. We are both planning to apply for college this year. I'm now scared that my work over the last few months in beginning to prepare myself for college has been wasted. I was the most optimistic I have been in years until this bombshell last night. Now I am just terrified. I had to go to A&E three times near the beginning of last year to do with my mental health. I don't want to go back to being like that. I want to move forward and I'm scared that this will put me back.

Edited by Dali17
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

We normally deal with this sort of stuff on the benefits forum. I'll move your thread there and leave you a short term redirect from here. The forums guys should be along over the course of the day.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

based upon information you have supplied, there does not appear to be much to concern yourself about, however can you clarify a few points

 

how much has you capital raised to?

do you know if you are receiving income based ESA or contribution based ESA?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

There is around £4000 in my current account and £15000 in the savings account the bank opened for me because I had so much in my current account.

 

It has always felt like too much but I was assured it was right because it was people whose job it is (at last partly) to deal with benefits who helped me apply.

 

It is income based ESA.

 

The news story I read was about someone committing benefit fraud and one of the things she did wrong was not inform them of savings over £6000. I have now looked this up and it seems I should indeed have told them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who has savings of over £16,000 is not entitled to most means tested benefits so since your savings went over £16,000 you should not have been receiving any ESA, HB or CTB so all of that has been overpaid. You will need to inform the benefits office at your local authority who will cease your housing benefit and council tax benefit, and you will need to tell the DWP and they will cease your ESA. You will need to inform HMRC but tax credits generally are affected by income rather than savings so I am unsure about the affect on them, but they will need informing. (Any DLA will continue as normal as it is not means tested) These agencies will then inform you of how much the overpayment is and then you will need to work out how you can pay this back. As you have considerable savings you will be able to pay a lot back in one go, which will then mean you are then eligible for means tested benefits again. Don't panic, as you are informing them (and not being discovered) and wanting to and willing to pay back the amount overpaid this is good evidence that this wasn't intentional fraud. Try and stay calm, difficult though I realise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

for the period that your capital was between 6k and 16k, you would have been entitled to a reduced rate of ESA

 

it would have been reduced by £1pw for each £250 you had above 6k

 

e.g. if you had 7k capital, you would owe £4pw

if you had 12k, you would owe £24pw

 

so until your capital went over 16k, you would still have been entitled to most of your benefits

 

as advised by abc123def, once capital went over 16k, your esa/hb would have ended - DLA/CA/CB would continue - CTC may be affected by any interest you received from yout capital though unlikely with current interest rates

 

best thing to do is explain situation at earliest opportunity to dwp and council so you can get the matter resolved

 

when you notify them, can you ask the to make sure they take into account the "diminution of capital rule in calculating any overpayment" - dwp usually remember, but councils sometimes forget

 

another thought, was any of the capital made up of lump sum arrears payments of DLA? as this can be disregarded for a period

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...