Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3693 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

me and my gf booked a room at travelodge(in my name).

 

I receive a letter from civil recovery solutions stating that travelodge are claiming for a damaged window

and asking whether I wanted to pay or dispute the claim.

 

Neither my gf or I broke the window or noticed any damage to it

 

emailed them saying I didn't do it.

 

Over a month later they finally got back to me saying the claim had now increased to 700ish.

 

An Invice for the cost to repair the window was attached.

 

In this new letter they are saying again do I wish to pay or dispute it

however if I dispute it they will take me to court and also add charges for the amount of money

they lost from not being able to rent the room out

 

I am a full time uni student.

 

I cannot afford this let alone risk loosing in court and having the claim go up.

 

I have exams in a few weeks and the stress of this has completely disrupted my revision

 

What are my options ?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would be supprised if it goes to talk

 

re-read the letter they ussually say "may" go to court

 

and they would need to provide evidence that you did it as well

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I agree with labrat about their letter. I'll move this to the appropriate forum, where others will be along to comment for you. If you do receive a summons from a court, the thread can be moved back to legal at that stage.

 

I'll leave you a short term redirect here for you to follow to the new forum.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I waz expecting this to be the usual smoking in the room damages but no something different.

 

If you didnt damage the window, then clearly you shouldnt pay. The fact that the amount appears to be changing and there are extra costs for not renting the room sounds susoect.

 

They may or may not start a court claim but they would have to show some proof that you did indeed damage the window and even then show that that attempted to limit their losses. All you can do is reply and deny any liabilty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They wrote " should this matter proceed to court they will be entitled to include the loss incurred whilst try weren't able to rent out the room during repairs."

 

They added "our clients staff will provide witness statements along with incident reports and cleaning logs confirming the" damage was not present prior to your booking I the matter progresses to court. They will also sign a statement of truth stating that the contents of their statement are accurate and true"

 

 

Travelodge are claiming that the cleaning staff discovered that the inside window was shattered when the went in to check it after we left.

 

I didn't do this and how do I know it wasn't the cleaning staff that did it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortuantely Travelodges previous attempts at claiming 'damages' for people smoking in the rooms shows that they are hardly trustworthy, see here > http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mg74/features/travelodge-fines in one incident they claimed a guest had stuck a plastic bag over the ceiling smoke detector, but it turned out the guest was in a wheelchair with no legs.

 

I suspect that they wont go to court as it would be a small claim and any legal costs wouldnt not be recoverable so it wouldnt make economic sense, couple this with the fact that they would have to travel to YOUR nearest court.

 

If a court claim is started though then let us know, and we will have to help to gain evidence, etc. Going on past experience in 'smoking' claims the evidence of staff and cleaners was often found to be unreliable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Thank you for your help. For them moment though what should I do as since this letter I received a phone call from the crs people on an unknown number asking me what I want to do and a day later I received a text saying to call them urgently. So what should I email them saying?

 

I'm only 20 which yes makes me an adult but I don't understand any of this stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I'm full time at university I am poor. I cannot afford to give anyone £700. Today I had to pay my accommodation rent which has left me with pennies to spare.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well dont then !. Have a read of the Watchdog page that contains lots of good informnation.

 

CRS are a debt collection agency, but like all DCA's they have no lkegal powers and no teeth, no doubt they will claim there is a 'debt' they are pursuing but this is (not a legal term) 'bollocks', there would only be a genuine debt IF it went to a small claim court and IF judgement was made in Travelodges favour.

 

Unfortunatley CRS are one of the annoying DCA's, ringing lots of times in the day, they phone me too..but I have saved their number and just ignore them (or answer and press 1) and let them listen to silence for a few minuyes and waste their phone bil.

 

Dont worry, come back here if anything further develops.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

As has been said, the burden of proof is one them and they would have to show on the balance of probabilities that you did it.

 

Are you certain it was nothing to do with you or your gf? If you are then just wait for a claim to be served and defend it. Presumably your gf and you will both make statements confirming you had nothing to do with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apart rom proving you did the damage they would have to prove it wasnt possible to mitigate any of their losses. If they do try it on again in writing I would be demanding to see the before and after pictures of the window with time stamps that prove the damage was done during your occupancy, all of the invoices from the glaziers etc and proof of consequential loss by having a fully booked building and only that room unoccupied but booked/custom turned down. point out that if they cannot furnish this evidence then they are going to get a complaint of harassment and attempted fraud made against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok

 

Firstly what actual evidence have they provide to you photographic, pre inspection report before your occupancy, after inspection report, is it actually the correct room, who made the allegations, witness statements etc.

 

Also who is to say it wasn't the cleaners that caused this and blamed the previous occupant.

 

Seems like TL are changing tactics.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

"As I'm full time at university I am poor. I cannot afford to give anyone £700. Today I had to pay my accommodation rent which has left me with pennies to spare."

 

Sounds like a bit of a panic

 

One word ---Dont

The 'crs people' have no legal power whatsoever. Firstly, do not talk to them. Ever. They are not your friends. They do not care that you didn't do it. They may pretend to listen and be sympathetic but they have one job and one job only, to intimidate you into paying up. That is all. They will not pass any complaint or explanation or outrage back to the Hotel.

 

So your only response to them would be to state( in writing) that this is in dispute with the hotel and that their interest in this matter should be passed back to the hotel Also state that that you formally withdraw any contact with yourselves including phone and texts and any contact should be in writing only ( do not accept emails).

 

So that being said your beef is with Travel lodge only and it is to them you should focus.

So-- write/email to the hotel in question and Head Office making the following points

1) You dispute and deny any claim

2) You require any and all evidence that they will rely on including :-all photographic ( with time stamps) and all witness statements including cleaning staff, also their cleaning logs and inspection reports, managerial actions and involvement, any cleaning/repair bills/invoices for the damage claimed and a statment of room occupancy reports for your room in the period before and after your stay but also to include overall Hotel occupancy to include the dates for the period that in claimed losses in 'not being able to let the room'

 

If you also want to up the ante ask for their formal complaints procedure with a view to asking why this was a)passed to a third party without contacting yourselves primaraly to resolve and b)an explanation why this does not constitute a failing in their actions under Data Protection Act

 

So essentially, Make it their problem to prove it, not your job to dis-prove it

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd just ignore it

 

UNLESS you get a claimform.

 

[never happens]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...