Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dealer refuses to return deposit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3720 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

on the 22nd of December I paid a 500gpb deposit on a 2008 focus titanium tdci fo sale by rix motors in warrington,

who agreed to hold the car for me until mid January as I live in Ireland,

at no time was I told the deposit was non refundable,

 

I rang this morning to cancel as circumstances have changed,

 

now I could be wrong but as it was an overseas transaction and rix did not give me a receipt the cooling off period is longer,

while I do not have a problem with them keeping reasonable expences ,

keeping the lot is a bit much,

 

also the car is now on their website at 4990pounds,

it has gone up 490 .

 

thank you ,

 

where do I stand,

 

and what can I do if anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

well in fairness to the dealer he agreed to take the car off sale for a month, during which time he can't use the money from the sale to buy another car as you still had most of it in your pocket.

 

 

I think you should be prepared to lose at least half of it TBQH. Try that, see how it goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well in fairness to the dealer he agreed to take the car off sale for a month, during which time he can't use the money from the sale to buy another car as you still had most of it in your pocket.

 

 

I think you should be prepared to lose at least half of it TBQH. Try that, see how it goes.

I did say to the dealer that I would be prepared to lose half of the deposit but they refused to do that , the car was off the market for 10 days which includes the xmas period,and to be fair the car had 129k miles, 3 former keepers. so I do not think it was going to fly off of the forecourt,
Link to post
Share on other sites

well in fairness to the dealer he agreed to take the car off sale for a month, during which time he can't use the money from the sale to buy another car as you still had most of it in your pocket.

 

 

I think you should be prepared to lose at least half of it TBQH. Try that, see how it goes.

 

Sorry, that is wrong. He has lost nothing unless he can prove that another punter came in off the street with a bundle of notes and wanted the car there and then but was refused as it was held on deposit for another customer. Unless that customer said "this is a once only offer and I won't be back", then no money has been lost.

 

If you want to keep a deposit, it must be made very clear to the deposit payer before he hands it over.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, that is wrong. He has lost nothing unless he can prove that another punter came in off the street with a bundle of notes and wanted the car there and then but was refused as it was held on deposit for another customer. Unless that customer said "this is a once only offer and I won't be back", then no money has been lost.

 

If you want to keep a deposit, it must be made very clear to the deposit payer before he hands it over.

 

 

Sorry Conniff, I think you're wrong. By paying a deposit he's agreeing to buy the car unless it was expressly said that it was returnable if he changed his mind. I don't think it's that a deposit is automatically returnable as you say: but I could be wrong.

 

 

What would the OP be saying if the dealer had sold it to someone else anyway and just given him his money back (and he hadn't changed his mind?) He'd be on here saying 'breach of contract' = and he'd be right!

 

 

However £500 is far too much for the dealer to keep. £250 maximum is on the outer edge of fairness, £150 would be even better.

 

 

Personally I'd give the dealer one last chance by a (without prejudice) letter to settle for some sort of figure and then sue for the £500 if he won't have it.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

You lay a deposit for the company to hold that product, your not saying 'I will have it'. He is only entitled to keep it if he has actually lost money by holding it. He can't say the whole lot, he will have to mitigate his losses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

distance selling regulations... been no face to face contact so possibly an angle there for a refund.

 

 

£500 is FAR too much to keep, £150 would be more than fair to pay for the dealer to readvertise, revalet, etc. Dealer just being greedy.

 

 

But it's fair to keep something, otherwise what's the point of a deposit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

tried to do a chargeback but cannot as the money was given over by me willingly, no fraud involved as far as my bank is concerned, thank you.

 

chargeback is NOTHING to do with fraud!!

 

you need to ring your bank and get them to do it immediately.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am a trader and know the law. But again, read the post above which gives you the exact legislation.

 

The trader can easily prove £500 loss. £300 drop in CAP, Possible loss of sales.

 

Thought so. But clearly you only THINK you know the law. There is no "exact" legislation posted on here (so far) that specifically excludes cars from DSRs. Goods subject to "fluctuations in the financial markets" can be anything from gold bars to diamonds. Plus you are forgetting one thing, the sale was not completed so the full purchase price was never paid, just £500 of it thus the deposit does not relate to the value of the car. In other words, what difference does it make if the car was worth £10k when the deposit was placed and it dropped in value by £300 when the OP cancelled it? Furthermore, what dealer is going to "drop" the value of the car prior to delivery?

 

I simply think you are arguing for the sake of it and have nothing constructive to contribute to the thread. You haven't even suggested that the OP seeks legal advice which kind of proves my point that you are batting for car traders, not the consumer.

 

OP, I stand by my previous advice; go see a consumer law solicitor for clarification and do come back to let us know what happens.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has gone wildly off topic.

 

 

The point is that the dealer's got the money in his pocket and the customer hasn't. Until that changes the op is out of pocket by some £500.

 

 

The law may or may not be on the op's side, I really don't know, but having the law on your side and actually getting paid re two different things, as many on here have discovered.

 

 

all the op can do is negotiate hard to get some of his money back, £500 is way too much to keep.

 

 

I can however understand that the dealer would, rightly in my view, want to retain some of it, otherwise there's no pint to leaving a deposit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a fair admin fee. What's the betting that if someone else had come along with the money in hand, he would have sold it and then said 'whoops' when the op returned. That's what these gutter car sales do.

 

 

Well I used to deal in cars and despite the above happening to me on many an occasion, I can honestly say I never did double deal like that.

 

 

But at the same time if I took a deposit in order to take the car off sale then I kept it apart from £100- £150.

 

 

A deal is a deal is a deal. Simple

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys thank you for all of the advice and help. just to clarify a few things,this is not my first time buying a car in the uk,however it is the first time I have had difficulties dealing with a dealer, this is link to the car which has gone up in price and the mileage advertised in 9k lower than the actual milage which the dealer did tell me, I believe the car is now sold, anyway I have decided to write to the dealer give tham on last chance to sort this out or I will go down the legall route, as already stated I am willing to forego part of the deposit which is only fair after all I would presume being as it is advertised for more money he got more than I was paying, item no, 221347318290

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...