Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ppi claim welcome finance.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3767 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

bit complicated this one.

 

have an attachment of earnings order against me from welcome finance that i pay directly from wages every week.

 

had a successful PPI claim and this was applied to my account and taken off what i owed.

 

i know im coming towards the end of what i have to pay back but

 

just checked with payroll and my attachment of earnings order has not been updated and they say that they have to continue to pay welcome

what the order states as it is a legal order and they have to abide by it.

 

i am of the opinion that one of two things should have happened,

 

1.I should have got my ppi claim paid out to me not taken of what i owed or

 

2.welcome finance should have told the courts that the amount owed had changed.

 

any help would be appreciated with this as i dont want to be paying welcome finance any more than i have to as they have had enough off me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how do you know the PPI reclaim was correct?

was this done by welcome themselves or the FSCS?

 

got all the statements to check it was correctly calculated?

 

so where did the reclaim go then?

 

who told you it went off the balance?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know if it was correct

 

i think it went through fscs if i remember

 

i only claimed it cos i received a letter from them.

 

I got a letter stating that the reclaim would come off what i owed

 

but my problem is my work are going to continue deducting monies even though the debt would be settled.

 

I did argue at the time that surely i had a legally binding document of the courts to pay them £x a week

and that i should be given the reclaim but to no avail

told it would come of balance.

 

But now im stuck in limbo because work are going to carry on deducting monies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what statements are you getting regarding you continued payments?

 

do those show the PPI has been reduced from what you were taken to court for?

 

your need

foryour own ref

to get an sar off to welcome to get ALL the statements

 

1 to check this PPI reclaim was correct

2. reclaim penalty charges - that there WILL be too.

 

was it welcome that took you to court please

or IND or someone?

 

how long ago too.

 

the court should have been informed by either you or welcome that the balance has reduced.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...