Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aktiv Kapital Claimform - nationwide creditcard 'debt'


barafear799
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3677 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I requested via email what my deadline was for sending my defence by email. They've come back to me today and told me the deadline was 20th Jan.

 

So, I'm not sure whether it is even worth doing a defence now!?

 

I have done a CCA and CPR request for this. There was no PPI on this card.

Their POC claims that a default notice was issued, and also an assignment notice. This is what I requested via the CPR/CAA requests.

To date, I have still had no response to these requests, other than a letter from their solicitors stating that they had received my requests and they were forwarding this onto their client.

 

 

I have emailed them back asking whether any defence I email now will be allowable - in the hope that it is - I would appreciate any expert help from Andy (or anyone else) regarding my defence please.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could bring forward their particulars of claim and a short synopsis (defence) of why you don't owe the debt babrafear

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought I'd update with the POC if it helps:It's a bit wordy!!

 

 

The claimant is the Assignee of a debt due in relation to a credit agreement regulated by the CCA 1974 entered into between NW BS and the defendant.

 

 

Notice of assignment was provided to the defendant by the claimant in writing.The agreement was terminated upon the defendant failure to comply with the terms of the agreement and/or the statutory notice of default served by NW BS.

 

 

The claimant complied with Section III and IV and Annex B of the PD Pre-Action Conduct.

And the claimant claims : CC A/C No xxxxx balance of £XXXX as of xx/xx/2010.Interest under s69 of the county court Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from the default date to Dec 2013 of £xxxx and interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at the daily rate of £xxx AND Costs.

 

 

I was wondering about the interest - and then I read somewhere on another thread that there is confusion over a DCA's right to charge interest - but I'm sure there was mention of whether an agreement had been defaulted or terminated.

 

Although judging by the wording above, it appears my agreement was terminated when the notice of default was issued.

 

At the time of putting these details on here previously, I was advised to put in a CAA/CPR request - which I have done, requesting specifically the notice of default, credit agreement and notice of assignment.

At the very start, I claimed that this was an old debt which I fell behind with the repayments, in part due to the fact that the NW BS cut my overdraft (on my associated current account) by £600 with no notice (althoguh they can do this, this did lead me to fall behind with payments - because I effectively relied on the OD limit I had) - and then when charges and interest was added on top of missed charges, it got to that stage.

Since then - I do not to my knowledge have any contact with Activ - although I understand that NW may well have passed on collection or even sold the debt to them.

I have certainly not been in contact with Activ to agree any sort of repayment plan.

 

I also mentioned at the start of this thread my desire to try to agree a Tomlin agreement with Activ - but was advised to do the CAA/CPR request in order to get them to prove the debt and that it is enforceable.

 

To date, 21 days after their solicitors confirmed receipt of my request, I have not yet had the documents requested.

 

I would very much appreciate advice on how to proceed please.

Thanks

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Responding to your PM.

 

So the basis of a defence is " At the very start, I claimed that this was an old debt which I fell behind with the repayments, in part due to the fact that the NW BS cut my overdraft (on my associated current account) by £600 with no notice (although they can do this, this did lead me to fall behind with payments - because I effectively relied on the OD limit I had) - and then when charges and interest was added on top of missed charges, it got to that stage. "

 

So its a Nationwide credit card which you serviced from a Nationwide current account/overdraft?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can sense a certain irony in your response.

I have gone down the route of "preparing to put a defence in" following your advice from earlier in the thread. My ire in this case is that Aktiv have seemingly jumped straight to the court claim route without much effort to contact me - I am obviously not trying to deflect any blame from myself - but I guess the vast majority of people who use and post to these forums have in some way "broken the terms of their credit agreements" in order to get the court claim in the first place.

 

Putting aside the history of how I fell behind with the alledged debt, I now need help in defending the claim from Aktiv capital - who have so far failed to provide the information required in my CAA/CPR requests (more than 21 days ago) - therefore, do I not have a case to defend the claim based on the fact that it has not been proven that the debt still exists, is enforceable and that Aktiv have legal claim to chase it?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bara

time is ticking. the longer you leave it, the more time they have to get default judgment. as, technically, you missed the deadline.

anyway, re a defence you should also include the default notice requirements mentioned. have a read around re that. did you receive one or not? if not, dispute one was received and get them to prove that they issued one and it was compliant with s87 consumer credit act and the associated def notice regs 1983. if received one, was it compliant? if not compliant then use that? etc

what was their response to your cca request? if no accurate response, then use that also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all barafear..why would I show any irony ? I assist and advise and draft defences for 1000,s of Caggers...I'm merely trying to establish the facts as to how best to defend this...but you will have to help a little...this is a self help forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all barafear..why would I show any irony ? I assist and advise and draft defences for 1000,s of Caggers...I'm merely trying to establish the facts as to how best to defend this...but you will have to help a little...this is a self help forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Andy - I totally agree - you are an absolute star - you (and others on here) have helped me in the past.

To be honest, I still don't really understand all the "legal jargon" of the "standard defences" offered on here - and I am also aware that any defence would need to be tailored to my own circumstances.

Obviously time is ticking and has ticked past - however, my requests for info (CAA/CPR) have still not been answered - no time extension has been agreed - but last I heard from the court (a few days ago) the claimant had not yet applied for judgement (possibly because they have a heart and are aware I am waiting for their response to the CAA/CPR.

 

As I say - I would like to put some sort of defence forward - even to help my negotiations if it came to agreeing a Tomlin Agreement - if they can prove the debt is outstanding, that they have a valid signed credit agreement and they can provide the deed of assignment and default notice, then I probably have very little on which to defend - although I do feel that they have jumped straight to the court route without any great attempt to contact me and "help me sympathetically".

 

Do I need any tweaks to the "draft defence" that I posted about 4 or 5 posts up this thread?

 

Thanks....to both you (Andy) and everyone else who has advised me on this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of Claim

 

 

1.The claimant is the Assignee of a debt due in relation to a credit agreement regulated by the CCA 1974 entered into between NW BS and the defendant.

 

2. Notice of assignment was provided to the defendant by the claimant in writing. The agreement was terminated upon the defendant failure to comply with the terms of the agreement and/or the served by NW BS.

 

3.The claimant complied with Section III and IV and Annex B of the PD Pre-Action Conduct.

 

And the claimant claims : CC A/C No xxxxx balance of £XXXX as of xx/xx/2010.interestlink3.gif under s69 of the county courtlink3.gif Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from the default date to Dec 2013 of £xxxx and interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at the daily rate of £xxx AND Costs.

 

 

Defence

 

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

 

2.Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with Nationwide Building Society in the past. It is denied I have any knowledge of the above Claimant or if any alleged debt was assigned to them.The Claimant has never made any contact apart from the issuing of this claim.

3.Paragraph 2 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment. It is denied that Nationwide Building Society ever served a statuary Notice of Default or a Default Notice or Notice of Arrears of any form pursuant to the CCA1974/2006 amends.

4.Paragraph 3 is denied the claimant has not complied with Section III & IV and annex B of the PD Pre Action Conduct as stated above they have never made any contact or request prior to the issuing of this claim. They even failed to serve a Letter before Action before issuing proceedings.

5.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14 or by way of a statuary Section 78 request so is therefore prevented from enforcing any alleged agreement or requesting relief.

I therefore put the Claimant to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the defendant is in breach of any agreement

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

6.As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7.On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

 

8.By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

 

One defence...I'm unsure if you ever did receive a Default Notice/Notice of Assignment/LBA as you never responded to Fords questions.

Edit to suit if there is anything incorrect as this will be under oath.

 

 

Regards

 

 

Andy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy - much appreciated. I have no knowledge/memory of ever receiving any correspondence from Ackiv at all - this would include default notice, deed of assignment (although I'm guessing this may have come from NW?) or LBA.

 

In terms of point 2 on the defence, you mention "no account numbers have been referred to" - the POC do state the a/c for the NW CC. Or were you referring to an account number with Aktiv?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have edited...I thought you was not bothering having posted that on Saturday for you.:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

and, what are you doing, have you submitted your defence? don't wait for a reply, if they haven't responded, then mention it in your defence as has been suggested! otherwise, could try negotiate a settlement, or...?

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence (Extreme thanks to Andy and others for their help) has been submitted by email. They responded telling me it had "passed onto the correct team" and no mention of judgment being applied for.

 

Still no reply to the CPR/CAA request. That was mentioned in the defence.

 

Do I have anywhere else to go in regard to them not responding? Do they have a statutory time limit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 days to respond if not the claim is stayed if they do respond it will be transferred to your local county court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence...barafear....forgetCCA/CPR requests they wont respond...the claim does not rest on if they respond to CCA/CPR requests or not it relies on a debt that is outstanding which you state you don't owe.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just a quick update - heard nothing from court since - I did try to email the address I was dealing with (in terms of sending in my defence) - but got no reply - assume it has been stayed - will need to give the court a phone call to confirm.

Thanks again for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to check on the status of the claim - telephone the number on the claim form - you will need the claim reference, just ask them to confirm the status of the claim.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...