Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks once again dx! Your advice is greatly appreciated. I think you forgot the bit where you say "In future contact CAG first." At least I would have saved £69 but I've learned a lesson way more valuable and that's not to ignore a debt just hoping it will go away after 6 years. Here's hoping as a gesture of good will they actually remove it. Although theoretically they could also put a satisfied default on my file as well. The irony is that I only found out because I wanted another contract with EE. They told me I'd never get another EE contract with the AP markers on my file until it was paid off, so that's why I thought it would be resolved. Interestingly Lowell put up a proper fight after their account dropped off the CRA but you're correct. It wasn't written off! They ended up agreeing in writing "to no longer enforce the debt"
    • I'm further confused, in your defence you stated: 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle] And not only that, this started out as you putting the wrong registration number in, you PAID for the parking, you just made an error putting the wrong reg in? ... de minimis? That was the crux of the case, what did the judge say about that?
    • My emailed letters to P2G have been received and considered by David Jeremia Schnur who is P2G's 'Escalation and Complaints Adviser'. His response is attached. 19Apr24 David Schnur Linked In page.pdf 19Apr24 P2G email to me confirming my emails received.pdf
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Not prosecuting in the public interest seems to be bandied about on forums frequented by students. I don't think I've ever seen a prosecution not go ahead because of that. You would have to define why it isn't in the public interest to prosecute someone who isn't paying their way and is costing other travellers more. I can't think of a reason. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bank loans PPI - Nat West


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3695 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Could this be a seasonal present to become a reality in the new year.

 

Been with this bank for over 40 years and had several personal loans over that time,

back to 1991, all with PPI.

 

Following a SAR request they have provided information on all the loans

and the amount of the PPI premiums added to the loans, in total over £15k.

 

I intend to apply for refunds of these premiums as I did not require them

due to the fact that I would have received full pay at my work for over 26 weeks (minus SSP)

and I was advised that not to take out the PPI could influence the outcome of the application.

 

Am I right to think that I could be entitled to a full refund of all premiums paid (no claims made)

plus interest and interest at 8%.

 

Your advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Essentially yes you are correct but in order to work out what the figures might be you would need to know the date of each repayment to each loan.

 

In addition, if any loans refinanced a previous loan there is some maths to do there as well since, subject to any PPI rebates you may have received on settlement of an account, you may have been paying on an earlier loan through a later one.

 

It is not necessarily quite as easy as it may seem to calculate what is due back.

 

Have a read of No.1 in my signature.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

whos the bank too please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doh! look where the thread was dx!!

 

ok well they usually cough ok

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello,

 

 

Hope someone can give a little advice on which will be the best way to approach this reclaims.

Details of the claims are from information provided by the bank as the result of a SAR request.

All details relate to personal loans.

 

 

23/06/1992 Loan amount £6517. Insurance premium £1017. Closing date 18/11/1993 (Loan one)

18/11/1993 Loan amount £8000. Insurance premium £1480. Closing date 23/12/1996 (Loan two)

19/12/1996 Loan amount £10000. Insurance premium £1890 Closing date 06/01/2000 (Loan three)

05/01/2000 Loan amount £10000. Insurance premium £1760 Closing date 19/12/2002 (Loan four)

19/12/2002 Loan amount £15000. Insurance premium £3614 Closing date 19/02/2004 (Loan five)

19/02/2004 Loan amount £23000. Insurance premium £5803 Closing date 09/09/2008 (Loan six)

All loans are now completed and paid off in full.

 

 

It is since the last application and loan paid off that I became aware that a reclaim became possible.

 

 

Would it be best to make six reclaim applications or can it be done on one claim for the lot.

 

 

I wait with anticipation for your advice.

Thanks

Boltmaker

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What you have here is a classic rollover situation.

 

You can put in one claim but on your fos questionnaire make sure that you mention all loan account numbers since they all impact on each other.

 

Have a read of No.1 in my signature as there is a lot of information on how to calculate rollover amounts.

 

If and when you get stuck, shout here.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ims21

 

 

I am thinking of applying for copies of all the agreements for these loans with respect of the amounts of interest charged on each one so I know where to start and what I need for the relevant calculations to come. Do I need to send £1 for each agreement or will £1 do for all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ims21

 

 

I am thinking of applying for copies of all the agreements for these loans with respect of the amounts of interest charged on each one so I know where to start and what I need for the relevant calculations to come. Do I need to send £1 for each agreement or will £1 do for all.

 

The lender is only required to keep documents for six years after an account has been closed so you are likely to have a bit of a time of it on getting details of those old loans.

 

You can always put in a claim without doing spreadsheets but it will be tricky to calculate whether any offer is right or wrong. You can always get the lender to send you detailed workings so that you can take a view on things.

 

You posted some details of the loans earlier in the thread...where did these details come from? (not from the agreements obviously)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Ims21

 

 

The details of the loans as listed were included in the SAR request submitted to the bank, so they it seems have information to some degree on the older loans. What about the fee £1 for all agreements or individually

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are thinking of a CCA request for the agreements, they are not required to provide them where there are no sums due under the agreement. Accordingly they are not required to comply with a CCA request for agreements which have been paid off which , according to your first post, is all of them.

 

You could try writing to them or even calling them to see if they have any more details on the loans but of not you may have to put in a claim without the details and see what offer (if any) they make. You would be entitled to see a complete breakdown of their calculations to take a view on whether it might be correct or not.

 

I don't suppose you have your actual payment records going that far back do you?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ims21,

 

 

The bank tru the SAR request have supplied details of loans ending 1090,5459,9788,2212 respectively on what they call Copy Ledger Responses which show each payment made, and copy payment statements for loans ending 9046 and 8775.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know the intended term of each loan - if you have this as well as the monthly payment- you should be able to work out the rebates when each loan was refinanced and how much was carried forward into the subsequent loans. Given that these are almost certain to be non-pro-rate rule of 78 refunds on RBS loans of this vintage - I would expect the redress figure to be rather substantial

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Andy.

 

 

I do not know the intended term of each loan as they all rolled over into the next one.

I understand from the FOS that a separate application should be made for each loan PPI refund. Not sure at all I can work out how much I may be entitled to or whether the bank is actually playing fair or taking some protection to themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As all of these loans are linked (as far as PPI payments are concerned and if the mis-selling reasons are broadly similar, you can put them all on one fos questionnaire).

 

The reasoning behind this is that, knowing the banks, they will not be straight with you and if you put them in as individual claims they may try and get away with dealing with each as a "stand alone" product. If they do that you will not get as much redress as you should be entitled to.

 

The main difficulty you have is the age of the loans and getting data from which you can accurately calculate the amount you should be getting back.

 

You might have to take a view on any offer that you might get and if you do get an offer then do ask the lender to provide a full and detailed breakdown of their calculations. That will help you to check whether they are trying to pull the wool over your eyes.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ims21,

 

 

Your comments are duly noted, one application, and if an offer is made full disclosure of calculations. All the loans are based on being misselling on the basis I did not need PPI as a "guard" against sickness or injury as I would have had been paid full salary ach month less SSP, and also it was indicated at each application interview that it may help with the application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...