Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1 Date of the infringement 31 March 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 8 April 2024   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 15 April 2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Y   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Y   7 Who is the parking company? Horizon   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Iceland Chester   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Horizon parking Horizon Iceland Chester.pdf
    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ryan Air...help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4613 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was hoping someone could help me. A couple of months back I ordered online 2 tickets for me and my partner to fly to Rome with Ryan air mid March time, they had an offer and including taxes they came to around £65.00. However my partner is unable to go due to unforseen circumstances. I have checked the website and they will not offer a refund they only offer a refund if the travelling partner dies and on this condition you have to produce a death certificate!:o

For someone else to go I have to pay an admin fee of £70.00 just to change the name on the ticket which I think is a joke and that would cost more than the amount I paid for the 2 tickets originally. I paid on my credit card and I was wondering if I have a case to get my money back.

 

Thanks:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim on your travel insurance. You don't really have a case to get a refund from Ryanair and they are not shy about telling you on their website:

 

Ryanair refunds

All Ryanair fares are non-refundable - except in the case of a flight cancellation or a significant flight time change.

Lloyds TSB, Total Charges £900, Claim Filed for £1379 - Settled

 

Sainsbury's Bank Credit Card, Total Charges £90 - Settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that but how would I go about that as i only take out insurance when I go somewhere and as I am not able to do go I wouldn't take it out??

 

Forgive me I may be being blonde on this one!!???:confused: :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd ask them to give you the money back or show you a breakdown of the £70 costs (i.e. are they true costs) and then take them to the small claims court if they don't pay up. I have done something similar with BMI when they charged me £50 to cancel a flight. I don't think it actually cost this much in reality and I seriously doubt that it costs Ryan Air £70 to change a name !

 

Change the name (at a cost of £70) then ask fo the refund/ breakdown of cost. Then follow the same claim procedure as for the bank charges.

Ryan air and BMI (et-al) will never discose these charges in court because they are comercially sensitive and are making money from them (just like the banks are with charges)

 

Go for it!

 

Magz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you haven't got travel insurance then I don't think there's alot you can do...

 

How about a letter to them detailing your circumastance and appealing to their better nature? You could say that your a regular flyer with them and that you don't want this matter to put you off flying with them in the future. I doubt they'd check any of your details in depth if you were to do this. I can't think of anything else you can do to be honest.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd ask them to give you the money back or show you a breakdown of the £70 costs (i.e. are they true costs) and then take them to the small claims court if they don't pay up. I have done something similar with BMI when they charged me £50 to cancel a flight. I don't think it actually cost this much in reality and I seriously doubt that it costs Ryan Air £70 to change a name !

 

Change the name (at a cost of £70) then ask fo the refund/ breakdown of cost. Then follow the same claim procedure as for the bank charges.

Ryan air and BMI (et-al) will never discose these charges in court because they are comercially sensitive and are making money from them (just like the banks are with charges)

 

I'm no expert on such matters but I would have thought you'd find it difficult to enforce an English Regulation on an Irish company.

Lloyds TSB, Total Charges £900, Claim Filed for £1379 - Settled

 

Sainsbury's Bank Credit Card, Total Charges £90 - Settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Change the name (at a cost of £70) then ask fo the refund/ breakdown of cost. Then follow the same claim procedure as for the bank charges.

 

On what basis? It is not a penalty charge as there has been no breach of contract.

 

Even though the fee may be seen as excessive, it is a charge for a service which is being agreed to in advance.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

christmasrallycag_468x60.gif

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a punitive "charge" or "fee" for doing something that would otherwise be quite straightforward. And it is this fee that you are contesting in court.

 

There's no difference between this and the punitive charge for going overdrawn with your bank. Both are excessive and unlawful.

 

Am unsure about the Irish company though..they may have a uk registered office where you could serve the summons?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is "Is £70 for changing a name reasonable?"

 

Section 15 of the sale of goods and services act 1982 allows you to find out in a court of law....

 

15. Implied term about consideration

 

1.

Where, under a contract for the supply of a service, the

consideration for the service is not determined by the contract,

left to be determined in a manner agreed by the contract or

determined by the course of dealing between the parties, there is

an implied term that the party contracting with the supplier will

pay a reasonable charge.

 

2.

What is a reasonable charge is a question of fact.

 

I doubt Ryanair or any of the other airlines will like you to find out - so call their bluff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If course it would be cheaper and easier to legally change your name than pay ryan air £70 - do it here for £7.50 with a statutory declaration which is a legal document stating that you wish to change your name and wish to be called that from now on. This is then presented with your passport and your ticket forming legal confirmation of the name change.

 

Change your name for £7.50 - change of name deed, Deed Poll or Statutory Declaration - Changing Your Name

Link to post
Share on other sites

But as a contract with Ryanair is probably going to be conducted under Irish Law how do you propose to enforce English law on it?

 

If you bought a toaster online from Spain and it broke down would you try to enforce the SOGAS against the Spanish shop you bought it from?

Lloyds TSB, Total Charges £900, Claim Filed for £1379 - Settled

 

Sainsbury's Bank Credit Card, Total Charges £90 - Settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even by their own admission they are not really an Irish company since they do most of their business is in the UK - but sadly, not legally binding enough for you to issue a claim through the county court:

 

Guardian Unlimited Business | | Ryanair chief admits his airline is not really Irish

 

Since you purchased the service in the UK then you still have some rights as a consmer but you should take legal advice on this as it could be costly claimng back money in a foreign court.

Some (not very helpful) advice here:

Consumer Direct: Factsheet - Buying overseas

 

Interesting that Ryanair can threaten to sue OUR UK government over the hand baggage affair and terrorism. but sadly they make it impossible for the likes of CASSI1977 to do the same.

 

Something has to give from Ryanair here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim on your travel insurance. You don't really have a case to get a refund from Ryanair and they are not shy about telling you on their website:

 

Ryanair refunds

 

Non sensical statement StudentInDebt. That's like saying "You don't really have a case to get a refund from The Halifax and they are not shy about telling you on their website:

 

Bank Account Charges "

 

The Non refund statement is unenforcable in the unfair terms in contract 1997 and even if they charge you then this charge would be punitive and not be reasonable under s.15 of the sale of goods and services act 1982

 

The ONLY hurdle here is issuing a claim because they are an irish company - who have offices in the UK and do most of their business here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that Ryanair can threaten to sue OUR UK government over the hand baggage affair and terrorism. but sadly they make it impossible for the likes of CASSI1977 to do the same.

 

Welcome to the open European skies.

 

You may be able to apply the UTCC regs afterall - from the BBC

 

The OFT said it expected other airlines to learn the lessons of Ryanair's case.

 

"We expect other airlines using similar terms to stop doing so immediately," said the OFT's director of services Ray Hall.

 

"Continued use of such terms will be considered a breach of Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999."

Lloyds TSB, Total Charges £900, Claim Filed for £1379 - Settled

 

Sainsbury's Bank Credit Card, Total Charges £90 - Settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ryan air have reduced their cost of changing a name to £45 which is still excessive.

I rang up their customer services just now and asked them how much it would cost to change a name on a ticket if one was to get married. The cost of this is a very reasonable £7

 

So it proves by default that the charge of £45 to change a name is excessive - when they admit that it only costs £7

 

thoughts?

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I can't comment on the issue of which country/how to take action against a foreign company, but I can definitely say that there is concrete case law as to draconian charges. The rule is that while a company is legally allowed to charge whatever it likes as admin/penalty charges, if the charge is exorbitant it must be explicitly stated - i.e. NOT just sitting in the middle of the Ts & Cs, but written clearly somewhere like on the booking confirmation or highlighted on the website. I think any court will agree the charge of £70 for changing a name falls under draconian/exorbitant, and should be subject to this rule.

 

One case to suggest if making a claim/seeking advice from a solicitor is called Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1989]. There are many other similar ones. Basically it involved a company having an exorbitant penalty charge. The company argued the charge was written in the Ts & Cs so the customer should have known. But it was held that was not relevant - where a charge is seen as exorbitant, it must be very clearly and explcitly stated - written in the smallprint is not enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I thought I should mention that the cost to change a name now with Ryanair is an incredible £110.

 

How on earth they can justify a simple change of a name by that amount, a month ahead of the flight is anyone's guess, but I think it's shocking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...