Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3751 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent my phone to these on 07/10/13

 

offered me £58.00 for my Blackberry and then changed it to £18.10 wear and tear.. Utter crap.

 

I have rang, sent letters (recorded) So i think the best thing to do is a CCJ after reading other peoples comments.

 

I know its going cost more than the phone but its the principle.

 

I even logged it with Haringey Council and the online fraud team.

 

I would suggest EVERYONE reports it to be honest so they can be shut down.

 

I dont know how they can let them carry on trading :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right. It is a scandal that so many peple have had their phones stolen and yet the police have done nothing about it.

 

If you issue the claim, I suggest that you name as defendants:-

Yemonia Ltd trading as Cash4phones - 1st defendant

MR NEARCHOS CHACHOLIADES, 2nd defendant

 

He is a director but if he wants to defend, he will have to file a defence with an address for service. If he does, then let us know.

 

Don't bother to send any more letters or threats. Just issue the claim straightaway and then get your judgment as soon as you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that i have access to the C4Phones Holding Company details as well - having just checked they are voluntarily winding the company up as of 10/12/13. MR SAVVAS KOUMOURIS is the named director.

NEARCHOS CHACHOLIADES is Director or Yemonia. £10k of unsettled CCJ's :-( I doubt ill get a penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where do you see that they are winding up?

 

I don't see it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually - I've found it.

 

What about Yemonia?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The usual suspects, of course

Company Register Information

 

Company Number:07474171

Date of Incorporation:20/12/2010

Company Name:C4P HOLDINGS LIMITED

Registered Office:

UNIT 15 GATEWAY MEWS

RINGWAY

LONDON

N11 2UT

Company Type:Private Limited Company

 

 

Country of Origin:United Kingdom

 

 

Status:Active - Proposal to Strike off

 

 

Nature Of Business (SIC):74990 - Non-trading company

Number of Charges:( 0 outstanding / 0 part satisfied / 0 satisfied)

 

Previous Names

No previous name information has been recorded over the last 20 years.

 

Key Filing Dates

 

 

Accounting Reference Date:31/12

 

 

Last Accounts Made Up To:31/12/2011 (TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)

 

 

Next Accounts Due:30/09/2013OVERDUE

 

 

Last Return Made Up To:14/08/2013

 

 

Next Return Due:11/09/2014

 

 

Last members list:14/08/2013

 

 

Last Bulk Shareholders List:Not available

 

Current Appointments

 

Number of current appointments: 1

 

DIRECTOR:KOUMOURIS, SAVVAS MR

 

 

Appointed:12/08/2013

Date of Birth: 31/08/1983

Nationality:CYPRIOT

 

 

No. of Appointments:2

 

Address:UNIT 15 GATEWAY MEWS

RINGWAY

LONDON

N11 2UT

 

Country/State of Residence:CYPRUS

 

 

 

This Report excludes resignations

Recent Filing History

Documents filed since 14/09/2012

 

DATE

FORM

DESCRIPTION

17/09/2013

GAZ1(A)

FIRST GAZETTE NOTICE FOR VOLUNTARY STRIKE-OFF

04/09/2013

DS01

APPLICATION FOR STRIKING-OFF

14/08/2013

AR01

14/08/13 FULL LIST

14/08/2013

LATEST SOC

14/08/13 STATEMENT OF CAPITAL;GBP 1

14/08/2013

TM01

APPOINTMENT TERMINATED, DIRECTOR DANIEL CHRISOSTOMOU

14/08/2013

AP01

DIRECTOR APPOINTED MR SAVVAS KOUMOURIS 14/08/2013

TM02

APPOINTMENT TERMINATED, SECRETARY CHRISTOPHER GEORGIOU 31/05/2013

AP01

DIRECTOR APPOINTED MR DANIEL CHRISOSTOMOU 31/05/2013

TM01

APPOINTMENT TERMINATED, DIRECTOR PHILIP HENCHOZ 15/01/2013

AR01

13/01/13 FULL LIST

14/09/2012

AA

31/12/11 TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL

 

This Report excludes 88(2) Share Allotment documents

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you do as i am and make a small claim through the courts and you can add the costs to it. They are trading under different names Yemonia is another name, C4P Holdings is another

 

Look at all the other CCJ's they have. You wont get your money. If they have formed another company, then you would have to issue a CCJ on that company or the director.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ompany Details

 

spacer.gif

print.gif help_button.gif

 

Name & Registered Office:

YEMONIA LIMITED

SUITE 21 5 SPRING STREET

PADDINGTON

LONDON

UNITED KINGDOM

W2 3AQ

Company No. 06300042

 

 

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gif Status: Active

Date of Incorporation: 03/07/2007

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Private Limited Company

Nature of Business (SIC):

46520 - Wholesale of electronic and telecommunications equipment and parts

Accounting Reference Date: 30/04

Last Accounts Made Up To: 30/04/2012 (TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)

Next Accounts Due: 31/01/2014

Last Return Made Up To: 14/08/2013

Next Return Due: 11/09/2014

Mortgage: Number of charges: ( 0 outstanding / 0 satisfied / 0 part satisfied )

Last Members List: 14/08/2013

Previous Names: Date of changePrevious Name06/12/2013C4P TRADING LIMITED17/03/2010SMOKIN CRUSIES LIMITED

Link to post
Share on other sites

Classic rip off merchant who is a petty thief. Seems he/she is from Cyprus and trading in OUR Capital City. I may be wrong but they seem to have an address which they are "trading" from. Probably ripping people off as peoples posts say. Often, it seems, the offer for the phone is a dangled carrot but once they get it the offer is reduced significantly due to "wear and tare" being the reason despite the phone being in great condition.

Ive heard of people sening almost unused iphones to these idiots and getting offered £200 and receiving nothing money-wise. Research it and you will see what I mean. All on google. "cash4phones" but the website is down.... wonder why!

SAVVAS KOUMOURIS is apparently the company director who is changing the company name/details/accounts so they can continually [problem] people.

I bet you the CCJ's mentioned by someone above are never paid.

Law loophole? Change the company name and details when you get caught out as a thief? Food for thought people!

Finally. It is WRONG!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...