Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car repaired but failed after 7 months....


matt_tee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3787 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

**** UPDATE ****

 

I have just heard back from the Garage that made the initial repair, and they have told me that they cannot do anything (though they are going to get back to me, I do not know when or why??)

 

Because the car was taken to a different garage, and this garage carried out the repair (although we did not realise that it was the original part, that was at fault), then we have broken our guarantee rules...

 

The only reason that we took the car to the garage, was because we feared for our own safety and the well being of the car, and did not think that it was anything to do with the original repair.

 

To make matters worse, the mechanic found a spanner wedged under the engine mount, that was left there when the part was installed, and he believes that this may have contributed to the fault. Also, the engine mount, upon inspection, was found to be loose.

 

Now we can not prove this, as no photographs were taken unfortunately.

 

I feel really annoyed, that the Official BMW Mini garage are wiping there hands clean of this matter! They haven't even asked for the parts to investigate! (although I have offered twice and they have declined..)

 

What can I do???

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Good Evening,

 

I am new to this forum, and I am hoping that someone will be able to help me.

 

In May this year, we took our Mini Cooper S to a Registered Dealer to replace an Engine Mount that had started to leak oil. This was replaced and we paid for parts and labour, this came with a 12 month guarantee on parts and labour.

 

Last week, whilst driving the Mini, there was a terrible grinding noise eminating from the front of the car, and it was getting progressively worse. Not knowing what it was, and becoming considerably worried, I stopped driving the car and asked my local garage to have a look at it and repair it if it was not too an expensive job. (I know the mechanic, and have used him many times, he is a family friend, so trusted him to do the right thing!).

 

Anyway, the car was returned to me today, and I was told that the problem was a sheared bolt on the front O/S engine mount, which had now become damaged because of this.

 

I was shocked, as I realised that this was the same engine mount that had recently been replaced.

 

Unfortunately, the mechanic had carried out the repair, because it was a not too an expensive job.

 

When I told him that this repair had already been carried out, in May, he said that we should contact the garage and attempt to recover the cost of the repair.

 

My Question is:

 

Because I never knew what the problem was, and that it has now been repaired, can I claim the cost of the repair from the garage that originally carried out the initial repair?

 

I have all of the original parts, I have the receipt from the garage that carried out the second repair, and the mechanic will also give me a statement to prove what he has done.

 

Thank you for your help in advance, it is appreciated.

 

Matt

Edited by matt_tee
* UPDATE *
Link to post
Share on other sites

engine mounts don't leak oil,I don't understand this

 

They actually leak Glycol. The vast majority of engine mounts fitted in a modern car are Hydro mounts and have a fluid fill in them to dampen out input forces that traditional solid rubber based elastomers cannot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue here is that under the terms of the warranty given there are two stages.

 

When you buy the part and it's fitted by an approved dealership then you get a 12 month warranty on the part alone. Now if the part fails and you go to a dealership for replacement then the manufacturer will normally cover the labour as well. If for example you had the part fitted by a non franchised dealer then you get the part only unless a franchised dealer replaces it. This is normal parts warranty procedure.

 

In this case, you have had the part fitted at a dealership and all appeared well. The dealer gives the 12months warranty on parts and labour as this is recoverable from the manufacturer if it fails. Alongside this the dealer gives an assurance that the labour is good for 6 months. So you have a part fitted and go to another non franchised mechanic. Had the part failed then you could take it back and they would give you another one. As this is not the case what you are complaining about is the labour and the dealer is only invoking the terms of the warranty given, i.e. had you taken the car back to any authorised dealer then it might be covered if the part had failed. What would normally happen then is that there would be an inter dealer charge for the work.

 

However as this has happened outside of the dealer network and outside of the warranty period the original fitting dealer gives then you are going to be hard pressed in pursuing this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The part is actually still covered under the warranty, as so too is the labour, as both were only done 7 months ago, and both parts and labour were covered for 12 months.

 

My problem is, as dedcribed previously, i had no way of knowing of the recurring fault, and if i had, i would have gone straight back to the dealership.

 

Out of common courtesy, you think they may have been interested into why the fault occured in the first place, and why/who left a spanner wedged under the replacement part!!

 

Very annoying...

 

 

 

The issue here is that under the terms of the warranty given there are two stages.

 

When you buy the part and it's fitted by an approved dealership then you get a 12 month warranty on the part alone. Now if the part fails and you go to a dealership for replacement then the manufacturer will normally cover the labour as well. If for example you had the part fitted by a non franchised dealer then you get the part only unless a franchised dealer replaces it. This is normal parts warranty procedure.

 

In this case, you have had the part fitted at a dealership and all appeared well. The dealer gives the 12months warranty on parts and labour as this is recoverable from the manufacturer if it fails. Alongside this the dealer gives an assurance that the labour is good for 6 months. So you have a part fitted and go to another non franchised mechanic. Had the part failed then you could take it back and they would give you another one. As this is not the case what you are complaining about is the labour and the dealer is only invoking the terms of the warranty given, i.e. had you taken the car back to any authorised dealer then it might be covered if the part had failed. What would normally happen then is that there would be an inter dealer charge for the work.

 

However as this has happened outside of the dealer network and outside of the warranty period the original fitting dealer gives then you are going to be hard pressed in pursuing this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update, The garage have called me today, and asked me to bring in the original part that they fitted, plus my car key, so that they can check my milage???

 

Anyway, I will update tomorrow evening....

 

Wish me luck...

 

 

 

**** UPDATE ****

 

I have just heard back from the Garage that made the initial repair, and they have told me that they cannot do anything (though they are going to get back to me, I do not know when or why??)

 

Because the car was taken to a different garage, and this garage carried out the repair (although we did not realise that it was the original part, that was at fault), then we have broken our guarantee rules...

 

The only reason that we took the car to the garage, was because we feared for our own safety and the well being of the car, and did not think that it was anything to do with the original repair.

 

To make matters worse, the mechanic found a spanner wedged under the engine mount, that was left there when the part was installed, and he believes that this may have contributed to the fault. Also, the engine mount, upon inspection, was found to be loose.

 

Now we can not prove this, as no photographs were taken unfortunately.

 

I feel really annoyed, that the Official BMW Mini garage are wiping there hands clean of this matter! They haven't even asked for the parts to investigate! (although I have offered twice and they have declined..)

 

What can I do???

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Good Evening,

 

I am new to this forum, and I am hoping that someone will be able to help me.

 

In May this year, we took our Mini Cooper S to a Registered Dealer to replace an Engine Mount that had started to leak oil. This was replaced and we paid for parts and labour, this came with a 12 month guarantee on parts and labour.

 

Last week, whilst driving the Mini, there was a terrible grinding noise eminating from the front of the car, and it was getting progressively worse. Not knowing what it was, and becoming considerably worried, I stopped driving the car and asked my local garage to have a look at it and repair it if it was not too an expensive job. (I know the mechanic, and have used him many times, he is a family friend, so trusted him to do the right thing!).

 

Anyway, the car was returned to me today, and I was told that the problem was a sheared bolt on the front O/S engine mount, which had now become damaged because of this.

 

I was shocked, as I realised that this was the same engine mount that had recently been replaced.

 

Unfortunately, the mechanic had carried out the repair, because it was a not too an expensive job.

 

When I told him that this repair had already been carried out, in May, he said that we should contact the garage and attempt to recover the cost of the repair.

 

My Question is:

 

Because I never knew what the problem was, and that it has now been repaired, can I claim the cost of the repair from the garage that originally carried out the initial repair?

 

I have all of the original parts, I have the receipt from the garage that carried out the second repair, and the mechanic will also give me a statement to prove what he has done.

 

Thank you for your help in advance, it is appreciated.

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...