Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thanks dx did i check the wrong thing , i havent checked any credit file as i have no credit at all not in well over 7 years now all bills are in my husbands name, have joint building society account for our state pensions to go in thats it for me, do not want any credit either at our age we just pay the bills when we get them
    • I have been doing a lot of reading but the intricacies of legalities is not always obvious to someone like me  and it’s a lot to take in for someone new to this So how else is it served?  so by that it seems you are saying that they will need proof of postage or will a judge accept that on the balance of probabilities a large company will likely to have sent it?   
    • @jk2054 Thank you for this detailed response, and appreciate you are responding while busy.  In response to your points: In regards to the £25 and £4.82 paid by packlink, in my witness statement, it is clearly explained that this amount of £29.82 is not in dispute. I agree with you that I will focus on claiming under the contract you have with EVRi as you entered into a direct contract with them according to packlink T&Cs.  I also agree that I will focus on terms 3b and 3c of the Packlink T&Cs and apply rights as a consumer, and use the third party as a backup if required.  Does it mean a new witness statement will need drafting to send to the court / Evri?  As per my previous post #246, I am thinking of sending an email to Evri and the court, that I have already sent my WS to them by post/email and attach the email that was sent last weekend to them containing my WS. In the email, is it worthwhile also telling Evri that I will be making a point to the judge that: the Packlink T&Cs provided by Evri in their witness statement clearly explains in terms 3b/3c that when a transport agency (Evri) is chosen by a user (myself), a contract is formed by the user and transport agency. Therefore, Evri's view that there is no contract is flawed, as under the T&Cs, there is a contract formed when I chose for my parcel to be delivered by Evri via Packlink. Evri's own T&Cs also state when a parcel is sent with Evri, a contract is formed between the sender and Evri. Happy to get any more thoughts on the above and then I will send the email either tomorrow or by Monday.  @BankFodder I have provided the screenshots and information you requested in post #248. Please let me know if there is anything you want to add to the above, before i send the email out to Evri and the court. FYI - Court date is in 2 weeks on 7th June.
    • as long as all your old addresses are showing on your credit file. there can be no CCJ, backdoor or otherwise. dx  
    • hi word for word the message says please contact us now on 03333201829 or an enforcement agent will visit you and a minimum fee of £235 {set by legislation} will be added to your balance quote re ++++++ that was sent on 20th feb, i then checked on the register judgements and fines website to see if there were any ccjs but it was clear,i checked old address and my new adddress,  will probably check again to see if there is anything  thanks for your help   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mental Health Discrimination at Work

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

I will start this off by explaining that I have bipolar disorder, anxiety and OCD, all of which I receive medication and treatment for. I also have a history of self-harm.


I started working for a supermarket a year and a half ago, and in my application i stated that I believed to suffer from a disability, my condition being mental health issues. I was also upfront about this in my face-to-face interview. I started off working in the clothing department of the store and my manager was great with me, understanding of my condition and knew i saw a psychiatrist and attended group therapy. I have my ups and downs in work, but last December I was overwhelmed with stress and anxiety and cut my arm during my lunch break. One of my colleagues bumped into me after I done it and noticed the blood from my arm and I was sent to the hospital to get stitches. The 'People Manager' of the store recommended I take a few days off after the incident.


In March, me and two others were moved to other departments due to cut backs and poor sales. I was moved to the bakery department and have struggled mentally since then. The job itself isn't hard at all, it's the amount of work that stresses me. There are 5 in on the dayshift, but only me on the back shift. There used to be two on the back shift, but they cut it down to save money, so I am doing work for two people. I always feel harassed into doing over time and during the summer I was on my own (as usual) on a busy Saturday and really struggled. One of the managers saw me and was concerned about me and I confided in her that I was really stressed and because I self-harm, it was doubly worse working unsupervised in an environment with knives etc. The manager sent me home and I was asked to see an occupational therapist a week later.


The occupational therapist told me that it was unacceptable that I had brandished a knife and threatened to cut myself. I told him that that never happened. He said it didn't matter and if my behaviour wouldn't change I would be out on my arse without a leg to stand on, and would struggle getting a job in this climate and without a good reference. When I spoke the 'People Manager' (head of personnel) about this, she said the occupational therapist shouldn't have used that language, but that the points he made were true. She said she has a duty to ensure I am fit for purpose and can do the job they pay me to do. She said she has to protect staff and customers from the aftermath of my self-harming as no-one should have to see that. She told me she would be monitoring me very closely for the upcoming months.


This happened at the end of August and ever since then it had bugged me. I have always been upfront about my illness and unfortunately one co-worker and my old manager saw my arm after I had self-harmed last December. I feel terrible that they saw that, but my fellow workers don't even know about my self-harming, and I wear long sleeved blouses that cover up my scars. I am very hard-working and polite, but I have told my manager repeatedly that I struggle on my own and I never get any help. When I wanted to move to a different department my manager wouldn't let me as she says I'm one of her best workers. I am also annoyed at how they added me "brandishing a knife and threatening to cut myself" on that busy Saturday during the summer. Am I being discriminated against or are they right and I just can't see it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a bit of both.... certainly cutting yourself at work is unacceptable.



A "reasonable adjustment" for you may be to not work alone as you seem to do better with people around you. Did you discuss this with Occ Therapist?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did discuss this with him, but he said that's something to take up with my manager which I have done, but to no avail. After I cut myself at work, I was told to immediately tell a manager if I felt that stressed again and I did. I never threatened to do it, just told her I'm struggling to do the amount of work on my own, and struggling with myself trying not to self harm, which was making me more upset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point I am trying to make, which I should have done with my original post (my apologies for not doing so) is that if I has a physical disability, I would be treated differently. Everyone is meant to be till trained, but the make allowances for people with arthritis or similar conditions. It's rightly so that they make adjustments for those people, so why can't they help me when I ask them?

A woman who cancer in my department and was off for 9 months retuned to have her shifts reduced to suit her needs. She also works back shift and they get me in to help her. It's completely right that they provide this help for that woman, she truly deserves it, but why can't they help me?

I am not comparing myself to someone with an illness like cancer, but though it may be less severe, I have an illness too.I have uncontrollable mood swings, anxiety which causes me to take panic attacks and they still have me working on my own. I feel I am being punished for confiding in that manager that I was stressed to the point where I am having to fight with myself not to self harm. They told me to ask for help, but when i do I'm told I'll be out on my arse!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So things to note

1) they can let you go for an y non discriminatory reason in the first 2 years. Now we know it would be for a discriminatory reason but they can make up a performance issue if they really want to. So if you can keep your head down for another 6 months it'd be helpful. Depends how extreme your condition is just now.

2) I think you need a re-referral to occ health. They should be making recommendations, not leaving it up to you to argue your case!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for replying.


If I'm honest, I think it was an empty threat/ kick up the backside. I don't take issue with them having a problem self-harming at work. I won't go into unpleasant detail, but it's something I usually do and keep private, but couldn't on that occasion as I had cut myself so deep.

My issue was with the way the occupational therapist spoke to me and the fact they had made up a story about me brandishing a knife. I do also know that the manager who dealt with me that day was upset at having her words twisted and told the head of personnel that was not what happened and was appalled at how I had been treated. I was just worried I has made myself an enemy of the head of personnel by speaking up about how I had been treated. I was polite and calm when i told her my grievance though, so I suppose it would be different if I'd approached her like a raging bull.

I just wanted to know what was right and wrong in this situation incase she made my life hell like she has done/does with employees she has problems with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I think a bit of both.... certainly cutting yourself at work is unacceptable."


This is pretty unhelpful, and really not understanding of mental health issues. For example, would you say "having a heart attack/going into anaphalctic shock at work is unacceptable"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Beardy, if you think my post is inappropriate, the best thing to do is use the report symbol to get the forum team to have a look at it.


I generally try and be honest, as I think that gives people the soundest basis to make decisions on. I can't see any employer liking that behavior, and I do hope OP can get to see occupational health again for proper guidance and suggestions her manager can implement, that may prevent her feeling like this at work again.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites


This is pretty unhelpful, and really not understanding of mental health issues. For example, would you say "having a heart attack/going into anaphalctic shock at work is unacceptable"?


I believe it to be relevant, and the OP has not complained.


Rightly or wrongly, employers will see a difference between an employee who has a heart attack in the workplace and one who self-harms in the workplace. Cutting may be be compulsive behaviour, but it's not involuntary.


In the same way, an employer may recognise that alcoholism is a mental health issue while still insisting that an employee may not drink vodka on duty. Said employers would do well to be sympathetic where possible, but there are things they simply cannot permit.




The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...