Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problems with mortgage broker.


Mmjan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3764 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, il try and keep this simple.

Please do not be judgemental I need advice to resolve the issues that I am having.

 

I approached a mortgage broker in an estate agents wanting a mortgage for a property i want to let out,

broker persuaded me to apply for a residential one saying a buy to let will be a hassle

Survey done, mortgage offer in, I'm putting down £50,000 for a house valued at £117,000.

 

I then saw a second house and approached the same broker who now has managed to secure a buy to let mortgage for me

and apparently it hasn't been that much of a hassle.

Again I am putting down £50,000 for this 2nd house and its value is £116,500.

 

The problem is with the first property,

I am usually quite adamant but I don't know what came over me.

I do not under any circumstances want to proceed with a residential mortgage knowing that my intention is to let it out.

 

 

I have had some heated conversations with the broker,

I asked him to approach the lender concerned and see if they could switch to a buy to let.

 

 

I rang the lender direct and they informed that any changes need to come through the broker, the lender does in fact do buy to let mortgages.

 

 

The broker keeps pressurising me and saying that the lender will not find out etc etc

and that he will approach them in 6 months time and ask for consent to let.

 

 

I don't want to ask them later on,

 

 

I want to ask them now as they may refuse consent to let.

 

The broker keeps saying that I will need to go through the whole application again and pay survey fees etc, which I don't mind paying.

However having so many searches on my credit file may have affected my credit rating. My rating is 3 out of 5 on noodle.

 

I am thinking of making an appointment with the lender concerned and going to speak to them direct about this.

 

Ay advice appreciated as to how I can resolve this mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Hi

Did you resolve the issues with you buy 2 let ?

Because I can advise

rregards

 

Hi Dun, no I tried to make an appointment with Halifax to speak to one of their mortgage advisors but I can't get an appointment until after Christmas.

 

My mortgage broker, I can't get hold of him.

 

I will not proceed with a residential mortgage knowing I am to let it out.

 

I need to decide whether I can cope with the hassle of doing the application myself or my broker.

 

Then need to decide if I should stick with Halifax or approach another lender.

 

Upon checking other lenders have got some decent buy to let rates.

 

Your advice much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its quite simple forget the broker whom always looks for the best deal they can make money on and no need to pay to change mortgages just ask the lender I be letting the property and they will charge increase interest rate because you are now letting to cover mortgage payments. Halifax is quite approachable but only sell their own products because being tied

Another way just let the property and declare it on your tax return which is above board.Remember financial institution are there to make money and fight for business

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Its quite simple forget the broker whom always looks for the best deal they can make money on and no need to pay to change mortgages just ask the lender I be letting the property and they will charge increase interest rate because you are now letting to cover mortgage payments. Halifax is quite approachable but only sell their own products because being tied

Another way just let the property and declare it on your tax return which is above board.Remember financial institution are there to make money and fight for business

Hope this helps

 

Hi there thanks for your reply.

 

Just for clarification, for your second option do you mean I stay on a residential mortgage or sorry do you mean I should change to buy to let and then declare the income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...