Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tribunal 'partial victory' placed in WRAG.


Bazooka Boo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes Thank you Rae, I had the RBL there with me, but I am not kidding when we were literally taken in sat down, told I had won, then sent out, the poor sod had come all the way down from London, his day started at 0530!

Besides, it took me another five hours to actually realise what it meant, to be honest, I still don't really know what it all means now, but I am tired with it all now, I have a veterans outreach centre I can go to next week to get someone to explain it to me, in language I understand...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can appeal; but it would be to the upper tier and you'd probably need someone experienced with doing that. If your condition has worsened your original assessment, you can tell DWP that you wish to have your case looked at on the basis of a change in circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can appeal; but it would be to the upper tier and you'd probably need someone experienced with doing that. If your condition has worsened your original assessment, you can tell DWP that you wish to have your case looked at on the basis of a change in circumstances.

 

I am in the process of doing that - believe it could take some time (or so I was told).

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Bazooka Boo:

Yes, the hoops depend on the recommended interval before reassessment. Is the twelve months from Tatos, or from a specific date on your tribunal decision notice? The hoops also depend on whether your award's based on national insurance contributions or income related. There's no longer a limit to the number of work focused interviews, but recipients of a contributions flavoured award, or credits only, can't be mandated to the work programme.

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once about every 10 weeks was what I had.

No pressure was applied - they were very helpful all in all.

The problems start once you leave the JC and move over onto the work programme.

 

Had I have known then what I know now, about the work programme I would have appealed my WRAG placement.

 

What happened to you on the work programmed whilst on WRAG?

 

There isnt too many reports from people who have been on it whilst on ESA.

 

I had one WFI, and then got moved to the SG, after my single WFI I was told tho I was been moved to phone interviews so I think wasnt going to be put on the WP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is WFI please?

 

And there is absolutely no chance of me doing any phone interviews!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent cheers!

I have no idea when I will be summonsed for their Work Focused interrogation, but I'm looking forward to dealings with them,

hope they're a fan of you tube!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happened to you on the work programmed whilst on WRAG?

 

There isnt too many reports from people who have been on it whilst on ESA.

 

I had one WFI, and then got moved to the SG, after my single WFI I was told tho I was been moved to phone interviews so I think wasnt going to be put on the WP.

 

 

With my JC adviser nothing really happened.

Each time I saw her she asked me what if anything had happened in respect of my health,change of medication etc, which she entered into the computer.

Had I had any thoughts of doing volunteer work, was I able to do my craft work, all put into the comp, but she never ever forced me to do anything.

She printed off things for me to look at - asked me at the next meeting how I had got on with it.

But she always made it clear she was not there to force me against my will.

I think I was very lucky all in all with my adviser.

 

But I also did my bit, I was never late, never missed an appointment, always polite and respectful, because there was nothing to be disrespectful over.

 

When she finally signed me off from her and handed me over to the work programme people, I truly felt she was not happy in doing so.

She made a point about them not forcing me to anything that was detrimental to my well being (pity they do not see it like that).

She also said if at the end of the two years with them - you are still not working, then you will come back to us.

All in all just friendly professional meetings with a caring attitude (again something the WP seem to not understand).

 

She even told me she new my CPN nurse, and asked me to say 'hello' to her, for her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very confused.

So I have been put in the WRAG group, then am automatically pushed into another group after a set period of time, in order to do work??

 

This is what I am ultimately looking to be answered, as I have absolutely no idea what it all really means.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very confused.

So I have been put in the WRAG group, then am automatically pushed into another group after a set period of time, in order to do work??

 

This is what I am ultimately looking to be answered, as I have absolutely no idea what it all really means.

 

No. As long as you remain in the ESA WRAG you can't be forced to work or apply for jobs. If memory serves, a 12 month prognosis means you can't be forced to participate in the Work Programme, but I won't swear to that.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. As long as you remain in the ESA WRAG you can't be forced to work or apply for jobs. If memory serves, a 12 month prognosis means you can't be forced to participate in the Work Programme, but I won't swear to that.

 

The rules changed December 2012, the only ESA claimants that can opt out from the Work Programme are:

 

ESA (IR) WRAG with either 18-24 month prognosis, ESA © WRAG (these two groups are voluntary at the point of referral to the WP, but become mandatory if the claimant volunteers)

 

 

The next section of groups are wholly voluntary.

 

ESA (IR) or © support group

ESA WRAG (lone parent with a youngest child under five or carers)

ESA credits only

Pension Credit claimants (without a health condition)

IB/SDA claimants (ESF funded England only)

IS claimants (ESF funded England only)

 

A 12 month prognosis will result in a mandatory referral to the Work Programme unfortunately.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules changed December 2012, the only ESA claimants that can opt out from the Work Programme are:

 

ESA (IR) WRAG with either 18-24 month prognosis, ESA © WRAG (these two groups are voluntary at the point of referral to the WP, but become mandatory if the claimant volunteers)

 

 

The next section of groups are wholly voluntary.

 

ESA (IR) or © support group

ESA WRAG (lone parent with a youngest child under five or carers)

ESA credits only

Pension Credit claimants (without a health condition)

IB/SDA claimants (ESF funded England only)

IS claimants (ESF funded England only)

 

A 12 month prognosis will result in a mandatory referral to the Work Programme unfortunately.

 

Thanks for the correction. Nothing ever gets better, does it?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the correction. Nothing ever gets better, does it?

No it does not. I have posted today on another thread that I've received a 'good cause' letter from JCP because Seetec have raised a sanction doubt regarding me not attending a 'mandatory' initial WP appointment. Seetec know I have a 24 month prognosis and I have gone to great pains to outline this to them on several occasions along with a reminder that I did not volunteer for the WP.

JCP are frankly useless as well, both the ESA advisor and the advisor that deals with the WP for both JSA and ESA claimants have promised to sort this situation out twice now, without avail.

 

I'm now looking at Seetec sending regular appointment letters that I won't attend, only for them to raise a sanction doubt each time, I'm banging my head against a brick wall here.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it does not. I have posted today on another thread that I've received a 'good cause' letter from JCP because Seetec have raised a sanction doubt regarding me not attending a 'mandatory' initial WP appointment. Seetec know I have a 24 month prognosis and I have gone to great pains to outline this to them on several occasions along with a reminder that I did not volunteer for the WP.

JCP are frankly useless as well, both the ESA advisor and the advisor that deals with the WP for both JSA and ESA claimants have promised to sort this situation out twice now, without avail.

 

I'm now looking at Seetec sending regular appointment letters that I won't attend, only for them to raise a sanction doubt each time, I'm banging my head against a brick wall here.

 

I am not with Seetec and only have a 12 month placement in WRAG so I know I have to attend but all of these WP believe they make the rules.

 

I had a badly worded letter from them which I rang the DWP to get some clarification on.

The WP had made it read as if they were responsible for me still being allowed to claim ESA under the WRAG stipulations.

They had even highlighted that part of the letter - scare tactics maybe.

 

Bottom line (as I already knew) no they are not - they can propose sanctions - but not as they were trying to make out.

I have been with my WP 6 weeks and have a list of complaints already.

It worrying, and it is banging head against a brick wall.

If we continue to make waves, they do have the authority to make life really painful for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we continue to make waves, they do have the authority to make life really painful for us.

And vice versa, I'm not about to fall over faced with Seetec's shenanigans. They are being vindictive in my case because I'm escalating a serious complaint against the manager via my MP and not using their own complaints procedure which I know will go nowhere. The manager got one of his subordinates to phone me and ask if I would attend their offices for a face-to-face apology which I declined.

I've also sent off a subject access request to the DWP for all clerical and digital records pertaining to my ESA case file, I believe Seetec were aware of my voluntary status from the initial introductory interview because they have access to JCP's records.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is still an unknown as well if someone has a 18 month prognosis, are they treated the same as 12 month prognosis after 6 months or do they get the waiver for the entire 18 months? if the latter then those with 12 month prognosis would be right to feel hard done by.

 

I am on contribution based so that was probably a big factor I didnt get reffered.

 

Lilly it would be really great if you could say what your work programe has been like since you got moved to it, to help others what to prepare for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is still an unknown as well if someone has a 18 month prognosis, are they treated the same as 12 month prognosis after 6 months or do they get the waiver for the entire 18 months? if the latter then those with 12 month prognosis would be right to feel hard done by.

 

I am on contribution based so that was probably a big factor I didnt get reffered.

 

Lilly it would be really great if you could say what your work programe has been like since you got moved to it, to help others what to prepare for.

18-24 months get the waiver for the full prognosis time, however I don't expect that particular concession to last much longer. December seems to be the month of change for the DWP, so I expect a raft of new conditionality to be rolled out within a week or so.

The agenda is to get anyone not in support group signing on for JSA, (in the case of mandatory revision before appeal) and force the rest onto the Work Programme. Either way, it's a no win for ESA claimants.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18-24 months get the waiver for the full prognosis time, however I don't expect that particular concession to last much longer. December seems to be the month of change for the DWP, so I expect a raft of new conditionality to be rolled out within a week or so.

The agenda is to get anyone not in support group signing on for JSA, (in the case of mandatory revision before appeal) and force the rest onto the Work Programme. Either way, it's a no win for ESA claimants.

 

Do you think the scraping of WRAG will come into force soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think the scraping of WRAG will come into force soon.

IDS would dearly love to do it and if the government can get away with it they no doubt will. However it's just hot air at the moment and I cant see anything moving on this for a good while yet.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is still an unknown as well if someone has a 18 month prognosis, are they treated the same as 12 month prognosis after 6 months or do they get the waiver for the entire 18 months? if the latter then those with 12 month prognosis would be right to feel hard done by.

 

I am on contribution based so that was probably a big factor I didnt get reffered.

 

Lilly it would be really great if you could say what your work programe has been like since you got moved to it, to help others what to prepare for.

 

Basically all I can say about the work programme so far, is that they take NO notice of you being ill.

As far as they are concerned - you are not ill.

I have NO trust in my WP at all.

As I am less than 6 weeks into the programme, I see a lot of stress and added mental suffering over the next 2 years.

They have no idea how to treat people who suffer from MH problems.

I have already been told that some people on JSA need a kick up the backside

People on ESA have no one pushing them to find work, so they lack motivation.

Think that say's it all really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically all I can say about the work programme so far, is that they take NO notice of you being ill.

As far as they are concerned - you are not ill.

I have NO trust in my WP at all.

As I am less than 6 weeks into the programme, I see a lot of stress and added mental suffering over the next 2 years.

They have no idea how to treat people who suffer from MH problems.

I have already been told that some people on JSA need a kick up the backside

People on ESA have no one pushing them to find work, so they lack motivation.

Think that say's it all really.

 

Yep, that's the mantra. The WP providers are still blinkered by pound note signs at the moment, once the realisation that getting ESA claimants into work ain't gonna be a walk in the park, the novelty will wear off and I reckon most will get parked for the duration with the occasional dust down for a money spinning CV course or two, then it's back in the broom cupboard.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...