Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks Dx. Still finding my way around this forum thing. Cant tell you how grateful I am for all the help. Just submitted the 75 to Natwest. Fingers crossed.
    • ok nothing historic there then. dx  
    • Hi All,  I have tried to use my own words as much as possible, any better suggestions are welcome.  I have been sleepless and hence i can't really think of alternative words, will definitely give it another go if you have points that i may have left out? Worry
    • Thanks all for all your input. I have decided to follow this all the way. So far, I have not replied to Alliance Parking's original NTK letter. The time-period for the reduced amount has now finished, and the time to appeal (21 days from the date of letter) will finish on 25th Apr. No further comms received from Alliance Parking. Could you please guide me, for my readiness, on what happens next? Am I going to start receiving letters from Alliance Parking > Debt Collector letters > Letter of Claim? Who sends me the Letter of Claim - Alliance Parking / Debt Collectors / Solicitors / court? How many weeks / months from now is this likely to be? Once Alliance Parking passes the debt off to the Debt Collectors, is there a risk of anyone turning up at the door? Do I need to reply to any other letters from either the parking company, debt collectors, or solicitors? Many thanks in advance.
    • I've just noticed this so wanted to my apologies for my response to this yesterday I didn't realise his name was worry, I thought you meant worry as in be concerned not referring to his name.   My apologies.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fraud Investigation Closure Letter or Not?


LifeIsAMess
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3802 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Does anyone know if DWP FIS let you by letter (or other way) if they have closed their investigation?

 

Also if they do NOT intend to prosecute do they advise of this or not?

 

My interview was 9 months ago, won my tribunal appeal 3 months ago but have not heard anything regarding if case has been closed or is still on going.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing,the dwp take their time with everything,why would they rush,they know they can eventually get you whenever they want,your national insurance number is on file with them,if you did owe them something there is no statute of limitations on it running out,they just deduct from future benefits,even your pension if you live that long

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you won your tribunal appeal and it was to do with the decision regarding the investigation, then it should be closed as there will no longer be anything to investigate.

 

citizenkhan, have you not made contact to ascertain what is going between then and now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you won your tribunal appeal and it was to do with the decision regarding the investigation, then it should be closed as there will no longer be anything to investigate.

 

Hi tomtom, thank you, yes the tribunal win was regarding the decision and overpayment of the investigation, however, several people have told me that I can still be taken to court for the criminal matter even though the civil side of things has been dealt with...is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you won your tribunal appeal and it was to do with the decision regarding the investigation, then it should be closed as there will no longer be anything to investigate.

 

Hi tomtom, thank you, yes the tribunal win was regarding the decision and overpayment of the investigation, however, several people have told me that I can still be taken to court for the criminal matter even though the civil side of things has been dealt with...is this correct?

 

No it's not correct, as a succesful appeal will nil the overpayment and as such there will be no criminal offence to answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LifeisaMess, I'm sure you must have posted on here previously about winning your appeal - no idea how, but I obviously missed it. So very pleased and relieved for you. Hopefully, mine (and the related court case which looks like definitely going ahead due to long delays in the tribunal system) will be behind me sooner rather than later. I know what a big, black could you've been living under...so glad for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LifeisaMess, I'm sure you must have posted on here previously about winning your appeal - no idea how, but I obviously missed it. So very pleased and relieved for you. Hopefully, mine (and the related court case which looks like definitely going ahead due to long delays in the tribunal system) will be behind me sooner rather than later. I know what a big, black could you've been living under...so glad for you.

 

Hi dc, yes I just updated my original thread with the appeal outcome. I can't believe you are still waiting for yours! :shock: I really hope a date for it comes through before it goes to court. How long now since your IUC?

 

Unfortunately the cloud never goes away, not for me anyway. I'm finding it really difficult to move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you attended an IUC and no further action is being taken against you, you should at least be sent a 'release from caution' letter.

 

Hi, thanks, this is what I wanted to know, like is it standard procedure for them to send one or does it vary by area or just depend on the investigator?

 

Has anyone else been to an IUC and gotten a release from caution letter? or a letter stating no court action is going to be taken?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dc, yes I just updated my original thread with the appeal outcome. I can't believe you are still waiting for yours! :shock: I really hope a date for it comes through before it goes to court. How long now since your IUC?

 

Unfortunately the cloud never goes away, not for me anyway. I'm finding it really difficult to move on.

 

I'm sorry to read that. Obviously you won't want to go into detail here but I sincerely hope that whatever is holding you back changes soon for the better.

 

My IUC was July 2012. Within recent months I received notice that a court date was set for late December. Given that the DWP lost my appeal papers (and then continued for some time to deny they'd ever received them) from early January of this year, an actual date for an appeal hearing was delayed. I asked for an expedited hearing, didn't get one, finally had notice from the tribunal service that my appeal was to be heard three days before the court date. That was a huge relief... until I had a letter on Saturday from the tribunal service saying that my appeal had been deferred at the request of the DWP because they didn't have a presenting officer to attend on that day. Bitterly disappointed. I've just written to the TS to ask that the original date be restored, giving my reasons as to why. I've also written to my solicitor asking that we give serious consideration to asking the court for an adjournment. I strongly feel that there is sufficient case law to support doing so. It just drags on and on.. and on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to read that. Obviously you won't want to go into detail here but I sincerely hope that whatever is holding you back changes soon for the better.

 

My IUC was July 2012. Within recent months I received notice that a court date was set for late December. Given that the DWP lost my appeal papers (and then continued for some time to deny they'd ever received them) from early January of this year, an actual date for an appeal hearing was delayed. I asked for an expedited hearing, didn't get one, finally had notice from the tribunal service that my appeal was to be heard three days before the court date. That was a huge relief... until I had a letter on Saturday from the tribunal service saying that my appeal had been deferred at the request of the DWP because they didn't have a presenting officer to attend on that day. Bitterly disappointed. I've just written to the TS to ask that the original date be restored, giving my reasons as to why. I've also written to my solicitor asking that we give serious consideration to asking the court for an adjournment. I strongly feel that there is sufficient case law to support doing so. It just drags on and on.. and on.

 

That's awful and I do not believe they need a presenting officer to attend...delaying tactics maybe? There was nobody from DWP at mine. I see no reason why it shouldn't be adjourned especially when you asked for it to go to appeal before they started to prepare it for court.

 

Well done for keeping it together for so long, I know it's not easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delay tactics? I think so, though it is easy in this situation to become paranoid. Regardless, there is a lot of expert opinion in the field of welfare benefits rights workers and case law to suggest that in most circumstances an appeal should be heard by a tribunal prior to a court hearing. Can but try but running out of time somewhat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...