Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dismissed due to disability, is that reasonable?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

I have just been sacked from a large public sector department employing many thousands of people.

I have been working for my former employer for 20 years

I was injured at work 13 months ago.

I do qualify for DDA/equality act 10

July 2013 a reasonable adjustment was agreed by all concerned to keep me in employment, I could not return to my normal job, but I would be re graded/redeployed to an admin post elsewhere, within an hour of travelling for me.

They very quickly offered me two roles that were both only 6 month temp contract. one of these jobs was a good 2hr commute, I was advised it was early days by my HR and I did not have to accept these and more should follow.

I declined the two posts but said I would accept something more suitable, ie nearer and permanent.

I was not offered any other roles for the next 12 weeks.

I was then called in and told as nothing else had come available I was sacked.

I have since been made aware that their was other jobs available but they failed to let me know.

 

is this reasonable behaviour from my employer??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi swinerton,

 

sorry to hear about your situation. Early hours/days yet so I'm sure your all over the place right now. Firstly most large public sector organisations have HR processes in place. When you say you have been sacked I would assume that that is not the terminology used by your employer. Have they put anything in writing?

 

Without anything else to go on - it is a bit sketchy - it would seem that you may have been on a redeployment list? Why weren't you offered redundancy or early retirement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to drill down swinterton, but if we know have a clearer picture we can try to help more effectively.

 

In terms of sequencing events I assume it was:

 

  • bad injury at work (DDA rated)
  • HR offer a compensation package for you to go. (Do you have that in writing swinterson?)
  • You decline as you want to retain your employment.
  • HR place you on the redeployment register [is that the correct procedure - any contributors?] and offer you two six month roles each of which exceed the agreed travelling time by an hour or so.
  • You were not told about other roles during that period. (Did you have easy access to the redeployment register during this redeployment period swinterson?)
  • After 13 weeks on the redeployment register you were dismissed through the capability process. (How much warning did you have that this was coming swinterson - did HR explain that this might be the consequence of turning down a compensation package when that offer was made?)
  • Redundancy and/or early retirement were never considered as options.

You don't have to say swinterson - but was your employer a local authority? You don't have to say which one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes injury DDA rated.

I have capability hearing and consequently placed on redeployment register.

I suppose it is normal procedure for making adjustments for disabled workers.

I was within a week offered two jobs both 6 month temp contract earning half my of my pay. one was 2hrs drive and the other quite local.

I did not have access to the register.

compensation is a part of my term and conditions.

after 13 weeks new capability hearing and dismissed, not for turning the jobs down but because no other had come available.

my compensation will be paid regardless. yes I have it in writing.

no I was told after I had been dismissed and they apologised for not informing me, but dismissed me anyway.

but as I have said I really wanted to keep working, to keep me healthy in mind and body.

no it is not local government,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi swinterson, I don't know much about HR, but there are others on here that do and can help you.

 

You have been injured at work to the point where it brings you under the DDA and you can no longer do your job. Your employer has not been able to find suitable alternative employment (although there may have been roles which you could have considered but were never informed about by HR) and they have dismissed you through the capability process and there is still some talk about compensation.

 

What are you now seeking? (You may want to reflect on that for a few days)

 

Personally I would guess any compensation package would not only have to be based on the organisation's redundancy (or early retirement) package but maybe also on the loss of potential future earnings due to the isidenjuries you suffered at work? Hopefully other contributors can advise.

 

I know it might seem pretty horrible now - but things do get better swinterson - there are plenty of others on here that have gone down similar paths - they have all come out the other side OK!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Made aware how and were you qualified for them?

 

can't help without an answer to this I am afraid!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi emmzzi,

 

An internal website and then they apologised for not offering the role.

was I qualified?.... well I do not know, it was on a lesser pay band and it was admin work which I had not done much of before, but i think I would soon get the hang of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, and the role was permanent and within an hours travel?

 

I think you have two potential claims here. If your injury was at work, you have an industrial injury claim, providing it was not down to you being reckless! For this I suggest support from your union, or check your house insurance for legal cover, or failing that get a no win no fee solicitor. It really is best done with assistance.

 

The second claim is a potential claim for disability discrimination at an Employment tribunal. This can be VERY STRESSFUL so not to be undertaken lightly, and can drag on fro ages. Also it will cost you to apply for it. Again, union support would be most helpful. Further questions there are a) have you seen occ health and b) are you being dismissed with a lump sum payout from the pension scheme?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that advice emmzzi,

 

no, I have never been offered a permanent role just 6 month temp contract, but yes it was 15 min travel.

yes I did have in total 7/8 occupational health referrals it was them that said it was unlikely that I could return to my job and re grade/redeploy to admin work should be explored. dismissed with lump sum from civil service compensation scheme, not the pension.

I am exploring the personal injury route thru my union at this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In your first post you say this

 

 

"I declined the two posts but said I would accept something more suitable, ie nearer and permanent."

 

 

I am not sure then that they are at fault for not offering you something temporary? (It sounds like the post 15 mins away was temp?)

 

 

Lump sum sounds right to me based on the OH report

 

 

Do your union think you were dismissed fairly? )I think you may have been)

 

 

Your energy may be best spend with the injury claim.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes only offered two posts both were temp 6 month contract, I was also told at that time by HR that these were only the first two offers and I did not have to take them as others would follow.

still awaiting union response.

I just feel that they paid lip service to the reasonable adjustment for several weeks, then told me that nothing had come up (when it had) and dismissed me.

we have internal instructions and government orders that state dismissal should be a very last resort, and I do not think to put me on the deployment list for 13 weeks, not offer me the opportunities when they come up, and then sack me is a last resort. I feel they simply did not want someone like me(Disabled) working for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am missing something, what other opportunities came up? permanent roles?

I was only offered two temp jobs, then sacked.

I was then told by a colleague that had seen at least two other jobs that would have been suitable on an internal web page. I do Not have other details temp or perm.

I then challenged managment on this.

They investigated.....then accepted that I should have at least been offered these, but it was an oversight.

They apologised but said it still changes nothing.

I received a letter of dismissal two days later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, you would need firm evidence for an ET. Hearsay won't do it.

 

 

Personally I'd concentrate on getting well, and your injury claim. It's too easy to let bitterness eat you up!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, you would need firm evidence for an ET. Hearsay won't do it.

 

 

Personally I'd concentrate on getting well, and your injury claim. It's too easy to let bitterness eat you up!

They investigated and found evidence, I think that is firm evidence!

And I am not bitter, just standing up for myself and fighting for what I believe is right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you have emails to that effect in your hand? a copy of the job ad?

 

 

if you had interviewed for the job would you have met all the required criteria?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...