Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Someone that specialises on the subject might be a better way to put it. 
    • Vauxhall's parent company has previously said its fate depends on the government's commitment to the car industry. View the full article
    • Apologies I hadn't seen that uploads need to be in PDF.   I have received the attached letter from STA which I assume is a standard letter as I've never spoken to them on the phone. I'm not sure what they mean by 're-commence recovery action'? Do I just continue to ignore them?   I have been in contact with the Uni who insist I need to pay the fees as I left the course after the first three weeks. They have not provided any evidence/documents that I signed an agreement to pay the fees or that I acknowledged that fees would be due if the course was left early. They referred me to their website which undoubtedly has changed since I was there.    I appreciate I shouldn't reply to STA however I'm not sure how to proceed with this overall.   I've read the claim form page and I'm not clear if I can request a copy of a credit agreement from the Uni as I'm not sure if its standard for a University to have required a credit agreement to be signed?    I'm not really clear what happens next and at what point I need to act. I've read about lots of different cases (fee related and non fee related) but can't find information on a case that is similar to mine. Do I wait until the Uni begins a formal action? I am concerned as I don't want the amount to increase from the already significant amount they are demanding.     Many thanks for any help you can offer.  staletter.pdf
    • I have now received some interesting responses....   Firstly - Lowell have sent a without prejudice letter offering a settlement of £3750 for a single payment or £4000 payable in instalments of £50pcm   Second - Lowell also sent a previous letter with the copy of the agreement saying it was the one they filed to court in 2018.  However I have not yet had it acknowledged from the court that they received a certificate of service for this.    Third - The court wrote to me today from the proper officer stating a video hearing will be heard 14 May 2021.    Dealing with each one in tern, I see the court hasn't responded to my email asking them to strike out the claim on the basis that Lowell haven't adhered to the order and that I haven't received the original documents and have now set this hearing date.    I note Lowell are willing to take an offer which is of interest. However I am inclined on the costs issue and trying to 'get rid' of the matter as cost effective and expediently as possibly to make a counter offer (at what level I am not quite sure yet).    Is there a letter template to use to draft a settlement or something that I can use to start with?     In Lowell settlement letter they are claiming it is not statute barred and that a payment was made to them for £200.  I have tried to go through everything and all I can find with the help of Santander who were my bank at the time, is a payment of £200 paid to Lloyds, but this does not have a reference on it only a s/c and a/c number.    How best is it to proceed?   Court Order 22_02_2021.pdf Response to Order.pdf Offer Letter.pdf
    • yes I have conversed over email and sent them forms both in email and by royal mail, firstly with erudio, then they sent it to capquest, then it went back to erudio and now with shoosmiths for a few years now.   And yes they are well aware of my correct and current address, I have only ever moved once since the loan and that was before Erudio and it was all plain sailing with Saas/slc.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2216 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

I would be really grateful if someone could give me some advice in order to help my niece whom I will call Susan for the purpose of this plea of help.

 

Susan started work at a children's day nursery and completed her 3 month probation 1 month ago. The nursery works by ages in the rooms, Susan is with age group 3-4.

 

Things were great when she first started, but her team leader moved back into her 'director' role into the office and was replaced by someone else, it quickly became apparent to everyone that the new lady was not up to the job (even being sent home when OFSTED inspected) and therefore immense pressure was put on Susan to act as team leader, over the weeks she became more and more stressed about how things were going, particularly as the current team leader handed her 2 weeks notice in and it didn't look as if she was going to be replaced.

 

 

Susan has realised since being there that too much emphasis is put on finances and not enough about the children, there is a lot of health and safety issues understandable where children are concerned and I feel Susan was beginning to loose her confidence in her ability to care for the children following the rules and regulations to the letter.

TBC

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Over the past couple of weeks Susan has become increasingly upset, and on the verge of tears most of the time,

 

her boss did call her in the office and said she's been told Susan seemed different, and suggested she had problems at home (which she doesn't)

 

feeling there is a no support for her Susan felt she should probably hand her notice in and move into some other less stressful kind of work.

 

Here lies the problem! Upon checking her contract of employment which is signed, it seems she was to give 6 weeks notice not the two she thought.

 

Unfortunately knowing she would not be able to complete the 6 weeks, at the end of her working day on Friday, she left her notice of resignation on the desk in the office, stating with immediate effect.

 

Within 8 minutes of Susan leaving work, her boss had left a voicemail stating she was going to take legal action if Susan didn't complete her 6 weeks notice.

Edited by honeybee13
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that since she is in breach of contract by not working her notice then her employer would be able to take action against her but I believe they would only be able to claim any actual losses, e.g. having to pay supply staff until they employ someone else. They cannot however claim for things like the cost of advertising since they would still have had to do that if she had worked her notice.

 

I'm sure everyone could give some advice which would start 'with hindsight', but what's done is done so I won't go down that road.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several of the other staff have contacted Susan saying *** said she is taking you to court, which further upset Susan knowing she was the topic of conversation. The next day Susan received a letter from her boss stating she was happy for Susan to work her 6 weeks notice, and if she doesn't, she will take her to court.

 

 

On Monday Susan went to her Dr and she was signed off for 4 weeks, given anti depressants and has been referred for counselling. I dropped the medical certificate into my nieces work on Monday afternoon. Today Susan's boss has returned the medical certificate saying she doesn't need it as Susan's letter stated her resignation was with immediate effect and that she (her boss) had accepted it. She again goes on to say she will sue for the 6 weeks she will need to get agency staff in at a cost of £13 per hour etc.

 

I know this whole thing hasn't been conducted in the best way as far as Susan goes but at 19 she is still a bit hot headed, and didn't think of the consequence's. On the other hand her employer has not shown the slightest bit of care for her employee before Friday nor since! It seems that this lady wants to buy another nursery and is cutting back on everything in order to do so.

 

 

Susan is beside herself with fear, I 'am very cross with her employer for continually threatening Susan when she is already depressed! Could someone advise me of how to word a letter to Susan's employers to try and get her off Susan's back

Thank you, any help is really appreciated

Maddie

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks reallymadwoman, I agree it wasn't the best plan of action, and had I known she was so unhappy, I would have marched her to the Dr's before she resigned, a week or so off may have given her time to re-charge and think more clearly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SweetLorraine,

I'm not entirely sure to be honest, Ideally I would like Susan's employers to leave her alone at least until her medication has taken effect and she's a bit stronger.

6 weeks seems an awfully long notice period, seems a bit strange given the team leader was only required to do 2 weeks. I wondered if an employer has any obligations towards the wellbeing of an employee, had the situation been dealt with rather than blaming 'problems at home' this may never have happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, 6 weeks notice does sound like a long time - given that Susan had only been there a couple of months would she still be working in a probationary period?

 

Perhaps Susan could agree to work the 6 weeks notice, re-submit the 4 week sick note and see how she feels about going in for the last fortnight?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Susan seems to have been asked to perform a number of roles - some of which may be asking too much of her given her lack of experience and her pay grade. If she does return to see out her notice it might be worth sticking to the duties described in her contract of employment.

 

It could be argued that her sudden resignation is a manifestation of the stress she was under.

 

If Susan is signed off sick her employer cannot ride roughshod over her rights. If Susan accepts that she would have to work the last six weeks the employer can hardly accept that 'climbdown' and then ignore the sick note. Accepting to abide by the 6 week rule may not only negate any civil action but may also mean that Susan could still get a better job reference from the nursery.

 

It looks as though Susan has found a bit of a 'mare for a starting point in her career. Perhaps she shouldn't think about giving up working with kids just yet - just see this as a learning experience which will help her suss things/employers out quicker in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys

It is a real shame this has got her down so much, she was very happy there and obviously they were happy with her, having only recently successfully passing the probation period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What notice period was the employer obliged to give? may well find, if notice period is shorter then contract will be considered unduly restrictive and thus unenforceable.

Was Susan's acting as team leader specifically within her job description? A change in the contract by one side allows the other party to repudiate it if it is a big enough change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no discussion regarding her acting as team leader, and no it isn't in her job description. I feel the boss/owner felt Susan was the best she had in that particular room and used her to her advantage, which is perfectly acceptable, but once she was aware it was becoming too much, I think she should have supported her rather than try and blame problems at home! The boss/owner would come into the room and direct questions, ask for information, give orders, make requests etc (not in a nasty way, I just couldn't think how else to put it) at Susan, completely ignoring the real 'team leader'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contract says the same for both parties. Up to one month = Nil One month to probationary = 2 weeks After probation up to 7 years = 6 weeks. I'm guessing real team leader (who worked only 2 weeks notice) either didn't pass probationary or made the decision pretty quickly she didn't want to stay.

Would there be any loopholes we could use given the fact that, until the employer received the medical certificate stating 'stress at work' she was happy for Susan to return, and work out her notice period.

I am so grateful for the help you are giving

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi maddiemay,

 

just to be clear where we are

 

  • Susan has resigned.
  • Her employer has asked her to work her six weeks notice. Her employer is threatening to sue her for the cost of any agency replacement for the 6 week period if she does not work her notice. (I imagine her employer could only claim the difference between what she would have had to have paid Susan and the agency worker costs [if it is a higher hourly rate])
  • Susan is signed off sick for the next four weeks.

Is Susan willing to work the 6 weeks notice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely correct sweetlorraine,

Susan left a letter of resignation on Friday 8th at the end of her shift at 1pm. Resignation says, she feels it best for her to go with immediate effect, no reasons given. 1.08 pm, boss left voicemail threatening legal action if she doesn't work the 6 weeks notice.

Sat 9th, Susan receives a letter saying, boss/owner is happy for her to work her notice, but will sue if she doesn't.

Monday 11th, Susan is signed off for 4 weeks, med certificate delivered on the same day

Thurs 13th Susan receives a letter saying she is going to sue if Susan doesn't make an agreement to pay, and also enclosed the medical certificate, saying, why have you sent me this, you resigned with immediate effect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm away this weekend so have told Susan not to open any more letters, I will do it on Monday when I get back. I just wanted you to know as I wouldn't want you to think I'm not replying, when I so desperately need your help. I intend to gather as much information from you all, and on Monday re-send the medical certificate and a letter to Susan's employers, including, Susan was in a highly emotional state when she left the letter of resignation, cannot make any offer until the 6 weeks are up and she knows the exact losses incurred (and of course we will need a complete breakdown) and anything else anyone can come up with.

Thanks everyone

Maddie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, the employer seems to be sending out conflicting signals.

 

 

  • The employer has accepted Susan's resignation but wants her to work out her 6 weeks notice.

 

  • Once the employer has seen the sick note however, the employer seems to then accept that Susan's resignation can be effective immediately and is now demanding financial recompense.... or is the employer still willing to let Susan work her notice?

If the employer can now see that if Susan comes back she will cover most of the period with sick leave the employer may now be taking a harder line.

 

Can an employer accept an immediate resignation then demand financial compensation for a cost the employer has yet to incur? (One for the professionally qualified contributors).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally, she can only resign with immediate notice if the employer agrees.

 

Simply put the employer cannot have it both ways. If the employer accepts an immediate resignation the employment contract comes to an end and there is no possible claim. If the employer does not accept this she is still employed until the end of the notice period. Stating she feels it best to resign with immediate effect is not the same thing as refusing to come into work.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone for your input. From the first letter Susan received it seemed that she/the boss (and stated) was happy for the notice to be worked, but then changed her mind once she'd seem the medical certificate.

Regarding both parties having to agree to an immediate finish, from what I can gather, Susan did think that the boss would be in agreement, given their conversation on the Tuesday prior to the day of resignation.

The other thing that worries me is that the employer can drag her heels if she wants for 6 weeks, safe in the knowledge that the £13 an hour (this figure was quoted in the letters) agency cover will have to be covered by Susan.

Susan will obviously need to reply to the letters, she cant just ignore them, but what to write is beyond me!

Thanks again, I'm so grateful for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...