Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
    • We both sent our completed N181 form to the court and claimants solicitors. We haven't received anything from the solicitors yet but perhaps we will today. How are directions agreed ? Does the claimant file proposed directions with their Directions Questionnaire ? I will update once anything is received from the solicitors.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claire78 v HSBC Round 2! ** WON **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here we go again.

 

I won against HSBC a couple of weeks ago and asked DG Solicitors to refund addidtional charges totalling £223.75 at the same time.

 

They chose to ingore my request, which would have saved them time and money. LBA sent today.

 

I could do with another couple of hundred quid before Xmas.....

PLEASE READ THE FAQ's

Link to post
Share on other sites

i signed for my settlement before realising they have slapped another £125 charge on my for next moneth. im having no luck contacting them by fone so will end up sending another prelim at the end of the week so know how u feel!

 

would be fab to have it all for xmas :)

Kaz :)

 

 

HSBC

claiming £2749 (£3400 with court cost & 8%)

mcol acknowledge 25/09/06

DG requested breakdown 5/10/06

Breakdown sent to DG 12/10/06

 

Yes Car Credit/Direct Auto Finance

CCA request sent 18/10/06

 

Whilst my aim is to be helpful, its reasonable to assume I am not a professional and am (dare I say) not always right. Seek professional help if in doubt

:-D

 

:lol: If i have intentionally or accidently said something of relevance or use to you, please click the scales:lol:

 

"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain". - Robert Frost

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you been in contact with HSBC to ask them to remove?

 

They put another charge on my account for £25 a couple of days after I won my case, so I got in touch with them by secure message and just stated that as I had won this case against them, I would undoubtedly win the next, and would be easier for them (and cheaper!) to remove this charge - it miraculously disappeared!!!

Dani

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been offered £165.00 by HSBC (out of £223.75) apparently they do not consider that the £58.75 card recovery fee is a ‘charge’ which they should refund. Does that mean that they think that they SHOULD refund the others??????

They didn’t need to send the bloke out anyway, had they bothered to check their systems or phone records they would have realized that the card was swallowed by a machine in Mallorca, and I called and told them about it.

PLEASE READ THE FAQ's

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have had a letter offering £165.00 out of the £223.75.

 

The remaining £58.75 was for a 'card recovery fee'.

 

A gentleman (ahem) turned up at my house and politely requested that i hand over any cards/chequebooks so that he could destroy them for the bank. I told him (truthfully) that I had called the bank over a month ago to complain that my debit card had been swallowed by a machine in Majorca, so I no longer had one. I had not had a chequebook on the account for over a year.

 

Basically, can I still demand the charge back, even though they obviously incurred some cost employing an outside company?

PLEASE READ THE FAQ's

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this comes under the realm of penalty charges - it is a cost they incurred even though it is thoroughly annoying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Just read your thread with great interest! Ive just won my first case and am debating on the 2nd but think I will go for it now Ive read yours! They enetered a defence and sent out a settlement letter the same day with me so you may even be much closer!

[CENTER][SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][/CENTER] [CENTER]My claim against HSBC for £4,957!! :rolleyes: [/CENTER] [CENTER]6th November - letter sent requesting refund[/CENTER] [CENTER]20th November - MCOL filed[/CENTER] [CENTER]23rd November - MCOL acknowledged[/CENTER] [CENTER]24th November - Breakdown faxed to Debs at DG![/CENTER] [CENTER]20th November - defence entered[/CENTER] [CENTER][SIZE=5][COLOR=red][B][I]FULL OFFER RECEIVED TODAY!! 21/12/06[/I][/B][/COLOR][/SIZE] :D[/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

OK, they have offered £165.00, plus £30.00 court fee.They have said that the £58.75 card recovery fee is not a penalty charge and supplied me with documentation which supports this.

 

Accepting £195.00 YAY

PLEASE READ THE FAQ's

Link to post
Share on other sites

CONGRATULATIONS Claire

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...