Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pro bono legal advice & representation


silverlight
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3813 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having a chat with an old friend last night and I was talking to him about this website. During that conversation a question arose which had me completely lost as I believed that if you were of low means, legal aid was available.

However he informed me that that isn't entirely true. It seems that he is in an awful pickle of not being able to fund specialist legal advice and that legal aid is no longer available.

 

I find this hard to believe but he may be right, I don't know.

 

His problems are of a very complex nature regarding various benefits that he is and has claimed for in the past. There is no criminality involved, he simply does not understand the technical issues involved as well as having to prepare and submit two written submissions to the MOJ (Tribunal Service).

 

If he is right, how on earth does he obtain good quality free legal advice and representation?

 

He has tried all of the usual outlets, CAB, DIAL etc, but all have said that it is far too complicated for their volunteer staff to deal with - he needs a specialist solicitor. He has also contacted the Legal Aid Commission and was given a few names of solicitors but none of them will consider it Pro Bono.

 

He lives in the South East area of England.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whereabouts south east? To advise of a place we'd need more detail to location - these types of places generally cover a specific area/county.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Is there a Community Law centre where your friend is? I've seen them mentioned for pro bono advice, also local law colleges/universities.

 

My best, HB

 

Many thanks. I spent all of yesterday searching but alas, no such centre exists. However I did find, via the County Council that they have a 'Welfare Rights Officer' but unfortunately that service is only available for those persons that are under the care of their Social Workers.

 

I also contacted at your suggestion, the local university who in fact do run a 'law clinic' but they are swamped with work already.

 

It does appear that the impoverished of this country no longer have access to quality legal advice via a means tested application.

But thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whereabouts south east? To advise of a place we'd need more detail to location - these types of places generally cover a specific area/county.

 

Many thanks. The area in question is the 'Romney Marsh' in South East Kent. Quite a large area that stretches to East Sussex in the west to the towns of Ashford and Folkestone in the north and east respectively.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this site:

 

 

Many thanks.

Great link thanks, but there is no such centre in the South East, plenty in London and in the North of England.

 

I eventually found a site through that link called 'Advice Now' which suggests that because of the cuts to Legal Aid, most people will now have to go it alone with help maybe from friends and/or family.

 

I think I have now scraped the bottom of the barrel and have to accept that there is no longer any help in this area, that is unless you have the funds to pay for a solicitor.

 

To say the least I am ashamed that I am living in a country that is nearer to the 1950's than it is to the 21st century and thankful that my working life has come to an end.

 

Thankyou to everyone that has helped

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are experienced benefits advisers on this site and we're happy to help where we can. If you give us some details of the issues, maybe we can help your friend.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he have legal cover included in his house insurance? if so, might be worth giving them a call to see if they can provide a solicitor for him

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another member of the site team has found a couple of sites that could be helpful in some cases.

 

HB

 

Many thanks HoneyB.

 

The links are excellent but as I have already discovered, Legal Aid is not available for any welfare advice or legal representation/submission preparation below the level of the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court or the Upper Tribunal.

 

But thanks for your efforts.

 

I will telephone my friend this morning and ask him if it alright for me to go into his problems in more depth on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he have legal cover included in his house insurance? if so, might be worth giving them a call to see if they can provide a solicitor for him

 

Hello, yes that was an idea I had and we checked it out. Unfortunately the cover is very limited only to what I would call compensation claims, personal liability issues and contract law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The facts as I have been told them.

 

My friend has always been in receipt of DLA since the early90’s. His normal rates were always ‘High Mobility, Middle Care’. In 2005 he was invited to make a renewal of his claim which he did. A doctor appointed by the state came to see him and carried out a medical in his home. Three days after this home medical he was admitted into hospital. At the time it was not expected that he would survive and spent the next 5 weeks in the High Dependency/CriticalCare Units. Slowly he recovered enough to be transferred to a side ward where he remained for the next 4 months.

 

Throughout the following 6 years he was admitted back into hospital for a few days at a time for his health to be stabilised. The times that he was not in hospital he spent in bed at home being cared for by his wife and children.

 

It was not until early 2011 that he was in any way fit enough to deal with his financial affairs. He first of all decided to ask for a review of his DLA award. He contacted the DWP who told him that he didn’t have a current award and hadn’t had one since 2005. He obtained a copy of his DLA files from the DWP and at that point realised that the renewal in 2005 had been turned down. He and his wife were adamant that they had not been told of this even though that there was a copy letter in the files sent to him in mid-2005 advising him of this.

 

He made a ‘new’ claim for DLA in 2011 and was awarded ‘HighMobility, Middle Care’ from the 16th June 2011. He then submitted a considerable amount of medical evidence dating from 2004 to 2011 to the DWP with a request that the 2005 decision is looked at again. This they did and in November 2011 he received a letter from the DWP stating the decision dated 2005 was to be changed and that an award from 2005 was made for ‘High Mobility,Middle Care’ – indefinitely.

 

Unfortunately the DWP refused to pay him any of this backdated award. They explained that as no appeal had been lodged against the2005, that decision could not be overturned but could only be superseded on the basis of new evidence that was not previously submitted.

 

This is where my friend is up to. How does he get the DWP to pay this backdated award which they have agreed is due, but not payable? He is far too late to submit an appeal against the 2005 decision. What grounds does he have when making an application to the Tribunal when he can show that he was in hospital for most of 2005 and between 2005 and 2011 he was both physically and mentally unable to deal with his affairs?

 

I would add that his wife and family have never involved themselves in the financial matters of husband/father - they wouldn’t have known that there was a problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...