Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abroad but having issues with CCJs and Bailiffs, please help.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3824 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello first post and was hoping for some advice.

 

I left the UK a few years ago and left some CC debts and unsecured loans, I continued to pay my debts until I could not afford to pay them any longer, at which point I stopped paying. The usual letters and threats came but these were just ignored.

 

However a few companies have successfully filled CCJ’s as I still have a property in my name albeit in negative equity, I have until now just ignored these and was intending once they were out of time, to just have the whole lot set aside, as I was not a UK resident when the court issued the CCJ’s.

 

The issue I have and why I'm writing is that after doing a little research it appears that the next course of action will be for the bailiffs to attend my address and seize good, etc. I'm not in the country but I don't want my tenants hassled and wanted advice as to how I was best to proceed if/when the inevitable happens.

 

I obviously don't want to make any contact with these companies as I don't want to “reset the clock” so to speak.

 

My initial thought was to just have the tenant inform the bailiffs that they are not me and then just to point blank refuse any further details unless a court orders them to?

 

I could also try and have the CCJ’s set aside, but I believe that I would then have to supply the creditors and the courts with my current address and don't really want to do that either.

 

I am hoping that someone will have the answer as to the best way to proceed, in these particular circumstances, as I have never dealt with bailiffs before.

 

Thanks in advance

 

sunseaker

Link to post
Share on other sites

its VERY rare for bailiffs to be involved in the majority of 'civil' debts.

 

very rare indeed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wont take it the wrong way , but they cant do anything... look at all the threads that we have naming companies... :)

They cant do anything, trust me.

 

Its fine you dont have too, however as DX mentioned, bailiffs wont get involved unless it has to be enforced.

I bet you any money that its a 3rd party company, IE Marstons, etc,

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like they got a judgement by default and are now pushing their luck trying to get it enforced.

 

Do you have grounds for a set aside application? Could the debt have been SB?

 

Your main problem from what i can see is this :

 

However a few companies have successfully filled CCJ’s as I still have a property in my name albeit in negative equity, I have until now just ignored these and was intending once they were out of time, to just have the whole lot set asideicon, as I was not a UK resident when the court issued the CCJ’s

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you're gonna have to fess up to being abroad.

 

that'll get all the CCJ quashed & the CO's

 

you REALLY should have done something about this as soon a you got the claim forms.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't believe it's SB think that they have a few years to go yet, BUT I wasn't a UK resident when they applied for and got the CCJs and CHARGE.

 

Technically you should have been a resident of the UK for the CCJ's to be granted in regard to debts that come under the Consumer Credit Act. But if you did not inform the creditors you were no longer in the UK, it might not be that easy to get them set aside purely on that basis.

 

If I were in your shoes, I would contact UK Solicitors to ask them to write to all creditors advising them that you have been residing abroad since x date and that the property address xxxxx is let unfurnished to tenants. You may be able to get the Solicitors to apply for the CCJ's to be set aside on your behalf.

 

If I could not afford or could not get UK Solicitors to act, I would write to all UK creditors with proof of residing abroad since x date and advise them of the situation. Then let them write to you and take advice about how to deal with each debt. You could ask your tenants or letting agent to write to the bailiffs with a copy of the tenancy agreement showing that it is being occupied by tenants and you have nothing there. That should stop the tenants being hassled.

 

As you do not want to provide too much information on this thread, you may want to contact Stepchange debt regisered charity and they can provide free confidential advice.

 

http://www.stepchange.org

 

You are risking getting to the stage at some point of being made bankrupt, with the house being sold. Just read some of the threads, where bankruptcy processes have been followed by creditors, not realising the negative equity. You can only apply for bankruptcy yourself from abroad within 3 years. After 3 years, you have to come back to the UK and apply to a court in person.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

its VERY rare for bailiffs to be involved in the majority of 'civil' debts.

 

very rare indeed.

 

dx

 

 

The OP is talking about his county court judgements and therefore county court bailiffs will get involved if the judgement is not paid

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you thought about paying what you owe rather than just avoiding it?

 

Perhaps they cannot afford to do so. Most people will pay, if they can do so.

 

I suspect that the house has been let to tenants without the permission of the mortgage company. Normally to obtain consent to let or a buy to let mortgage you need to have a decent amount of equity in the property. If the OP has breached the terms of the mortgage, it could get quite messy. The mortgage company as the primary creditors of the property, need to be aware of any risks which they are being subjected to. If a charge has been made on the property, I would have thought that land registry would have notified the mortgage company.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is, surely once the courts become aware that the CCJS were issued incorrectly won't all the other things fall away too?

 

Plus once the bailiffs are aware that I'm not there, plus that there is nothing that they are able to seize, what could there next move be?

 

What would be the benefit of making me bankrupt be, the montage company has first claim on the house, once they are paid back, there would be nothing left for any creditors. So why would they go to the expense of trying to make me bankrupt for zero gain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to be a UK citizen to have a CCJ issued against you.

 

However if you do not have any assets here then there is nothing for the bailiff to seize. It would be prudent of your tenants to clarify this with an affidavit.

 

It is also unlikely that you'll be made bankrupt as the costs in doing so can be high with no real gain.

 

However, you still haven't said why you won't pay what is owed...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HCEO, I thought that a CCJ can only be issued to someone living I the UK, and to help your moral compass, in my original post I said that I paid what I owed until I could afford to pay it not more. :???:

 

Can I suggest that you contact Stepchange or National Debtline to discuss your situation, without the need to provide confidential information to an internet forum.

 

You need to do this asap, before matters escalate and it is harder to deal with them. To apply to set aside a CCJ, you must do so without any delay, as soon as you found out about them. In the set aside application, you would need to state when you found out about the CCJ and what your grounds are for setting aside. If you don't have someone acting for you in court, you might need to attend if there is a hearing about the set aside.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...