Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Notice of distress warrant


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3822 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

i have just received a letter in the post from collectica demanding i pay £354.10 by 14 days.

 

It was for a unpaid train fine.

 

I believe they are referring to an incident that happened one year ago

where i was travelling into london without a ticket as i was running late and boarded the train without one.

 

I didnt think this would be a problem because the station i was travelling is a main one with guys at the gates with ticket machines.

 

Plus i had over £60 cash on me, so i could pay for the ticket there.

 

A ticket inspector told me i couldnt do this and asked for my details so he could send me the £20 fine.

 

I refused to pay the fine because i obviously wasn't trying to skip the train,

having plenty of money on me and exiting a main station.

 

But i gave him my address details and he said i could be sent to court.

 

This was one year ago.

 

Today i was sent this letter.

 

I have not received any letters up until now.

 

I do not have the money to pay for this.

 

What are my options?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG if you did no kow about he court case then ask your local court to make what is known as a Statutory Declaration, this resets the clock then you go back to court the case is re heard and then you can put in a defence but however if it is found that you knew of the case there are serious consequences involved.

 

MM

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi richardsun,

 

I have moved this thread to a more appropriate Forum.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have a read of a few threads in this transport forum you are now in:

Public transport (Trains, tubes and buses)

you'll see that, sadly, you did break the bylaws of train travel.

 

you 'should' have sought a conductor on board before you arrived at your destination to get a ticket.

 

looking at what typically happens, lets say if this hadn't gone to court

and you'd responded to the letter [that you did not get]

it would probably end up at about the same sum.

 

now your real issue here might be if you now have a criminal conviction against you?

 

it might be an idea to phone the court and enquire what the judgement was

& if you have a criminal conviction too.

 

if its just they gave you a fine in court

-then personally i'd pay the sum owed to the court there and then

or ask for a redetermination form or a variation form as you cant afford this in one 'go'

 

if it transpires you do have a criminal conviction, then yes i'd be doing the

statutory declaration and get things reset.

 

think that right.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm going to assume that this company is acting on behalf of the Court to collect an unpaid court fine, judging by what you've said and the terminology used.

 

It's amazing the amount of posters who come here and say something like

"Obviously I wasn't trying to avoid paying my fare, as I had plenty of money on me at the time…".

 

That's all well and good, but if the ticket barriers were open and you weren't challenged?

C'mon, you're only human after all.

 

Regardless, you don't have to be avoiding your fare to be dealt with in this way,

in fact,

you were issued a Penalty Fare Notice,

which is intended for situations such as these,

where the staff believed it was a one off offence with no intent to avoid payment being evident.

 

A deterrent against fare evasion if you like.

 

If they believed you intended to avoid payment,

they would,

or at least should have cut out the idle man so to speak,

and report you straight to their prosecutions dept.

 

Anyway, all that said, that doesn't answer your question.

 

Not sure why you wouldn't have known about this before now, unless you have moved address?

If you didn't know about the case, you need to make a Statutory Declaration to the court to tell them this and the case will be re-heard.

 

Unfortunately though, you'll probably still be found guilty and ordered to pay a fine and costs amounting to about what is being demanded now.

 

If it was a Byelaw offence you are being charged with, then there's very little defence, as it's an offence of Strict Liability

(You either did travel without buying a ticket, or you didn't…

As long as nobody gave you permission and there were places at your origin to buy tickets, you have no defence I'm afraid.).

 

If charged under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889, the train company would need to be able to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that you intended to avoid payment.

 

If the latter is applicable, then you should obviously plead not guilty, assuming you were not guilty.

 

First things first though, the Statutory Declaration is the way to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply guys.

 

yes i realize i was too stupid for doing it and my comment

'Obviously I wasn't trying to avoid paying my fare, as I had plenty of money on me at the time…' is dumb too.

 

But i was travelling near peak time to a major station (where in the past i have paid for tickets when i got there(and seen plenty of other people do so))

so i didnt think it would be a problem.

 

I havent moved address but I did have another matter that i thought went away about 2 years ago regarding a similar situation.

 

Long story short, there was some sort of problem with my oyster card, i got fined, and appealed it.

I didnt receive anything back from them so i presumed the matter was closed.

This was 2 years ago when i was working in London.

 

So what your saying about them cutting the middle man out seems to make sense here given that technically speaking it wasnt my first offence

so i guess they thought i was avoiding the fine again.

 

Firstly, how do i go about finding out what the judgement was?

Secondly, how do i go about this statutory declaration?

 

Also, why did i not receive any letters before this? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the named court on both.

 

will deal with your enquiry and the sd if you wish just ask then

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, how do i go about finding out what the judgement was?

Secondly, how do i go about this statutory declaration?

 

Also, why did i not receive any letters before this? thanks

 

 

First: The notice that you have received from bailiffs will tell you what it is for and which Court the judgment was made at.

 

If you have any doubt about the amount of that judgment and if you cannot see a number on the paperwork to call, go to the HMCTS website and look up the relevant Court.

 

I have no doubt that the Court office will have a record showing that they sent you a notice of judgment stating how much you had to pay in fine, costs & victim surcharge

 

To get this knocked back to start again you will need to go to your local Magistrates Court, take the paperwork with you and ask to make a Statutory Declaration

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...