Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

csa issue


stu997
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3779 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

A little bit of advice if possible please.

My ex is still claiming child benefit even though my daughter is 19, not in further education and has a job. Her current hours are 44 per week.

I have informed the CSA of this and they have said as child benefit is still being paid, I have to pay them.

I have reported the ex for fraud to the Child benefit people who are now investigating.

The CSA are continuing to ring me and tell me I need to pay up.

If I do there is no way at all I will get any of the money back off my ex.

What should I do?

Before anyone says I should pay to the upkeep of my daughter I havent got a problem with that. The money paid already to the csa has gone in the ex's pocket and none to my daughter. I want to help my daughter out directly of course!

Please help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not had chance to tell them yet. My solicitor has advised me not to pay as she knows it will be futile trying to get a penny back off the ex.

I dont know whether i can grt the csa to suspend payments pending the outcome of investigation or not.

They wont care at all about me getting the money back or not as long as they get it in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to send the CSA proof that there is an investigation going on. The outcome as far as I can see will be one of the following:

 

1) Nothing will change and you should keep paying to avoid being stung for arrears

2) The CSA will suspend payments until the outcome of the investigation

 

As for your ex, if she is overpaid then she will be chased for that overpayment just as you would be if you got into arrears. I was apparently overpaid last year and had the overpayment amount deducted from my CSA payments each month until it was paid back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So,

I wrote a letter to the CSA and have not heard a thing.

I then contacted HMRC, who have confirmed again that Child Benefit should have stopped the Monday after my Daughter started working over 24 hours a week. I asked if this was the case as the hours my daughter's working, are only up till christmas. She will then revert back to her normal less than 24 hours a week unless she gets overtime. They told me that Child Benefit should have stopped, soon as she worked over 24 hours.

I cannot find out anything in regard to their investigation so I have to sit and wait in hope it all gets sorted, and in the meantime just keep paying up,

Is there something like a Complaints Commision for Child Benefit/ CSA I can write to

Or is there anything else i can do other than sit and wait till they bother to do something?

I have thought about reporting fraud to the police, as she is defrauding money off of me. Any ideas whether this would be a successful move?

Would HMRC do something if my solicitor was to write to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt that the police would be interested - if someone is committing CB fraud or making false statements to the CSA, then the fraud investigators are the people who work for the CSA/HMRC. The police would not normally deal with such things directly.

 

If you really feel something is wrong, I think I'd have to advise starting by contacting your MP in this situation. After all, that's what we pay them for.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...