Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Summons Received via Capquest/Dryden solicitors for Halifax CC debt...help!


Ingrid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3663 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is what happens when you dont come back for advice Ingrid...now if you had of posted in Nov 13 stating that they were 14 days late we could have struck it out.You have allowed 5 months to pass and allowed them time to get up to speed.

 

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ingrid You unfortunately seem to have taken a rather flippant approach to this debt and now it has come back to bite. However, all may not be lost.

If the agreement was pre-2007 the original, not a copy, is most likely needed for enforcement to succeed and it should be "compliant". And are you sure it is the agreement itself they have sent, or just an application form?

If you scan and post up what you received asap, peeps here may be able to assess its compliance for enforceability.

For your part, you can ask whether they have the original or are relying on only a copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the initial acknowledgement from the Court to my defence. I think I got confused over the first paragraph which suggests that the Court would inform me of what will happen. I checked mconline and, again, there's only an acknowledgement.

I didn't realise the onus was on me to pursue it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant read any of the above Ingrid all uploads must be PDF format.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Work's machine will definitely work. I do have a pdf button on my home machine but nothing happens when I press it.

It does, unfortunately, look like the agreement. Believe me Oleg, I have been having sleepless nights over this and no-one is giving themselves a harder time than me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've all been there, Ingrid, but believe me, it just ain't worth it. With respect, you probably made matters worse by not taking things seriously earlier, but hey ho, the past is passed and we try again.

Pls get some good sleep. Don't count DCAs or scanners, stick to sheep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ostrich syndrome Oleg. Once I'd missed a couple of payments early on on this debt, with the amount of other cc payments and severe lack of income at that time, I was on a hiding to nothing. The smaller debts I felt I could manage. But this one's not going to go away. I don't understand the Court system and have been kicking myself hard since I learnt that I should have contacted the Court myself. I truly believed that they would contact me had Drydens not responded within the 28 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The sad reality is that much of the Court system is opaque and Common Man / Woman is brushed aside and left bewildered. It is truly shocking that when proceedings are issued they don't supply more brief "What happens next" guidance notes.

Debt purchasers are aware of our ignorance and profit on our misery. Shamelessly immoral.

Happy scanning today. I may not be around later but I'm sure others can review your docs, especially checking enforceability - or lack of [we hope!].

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ingrid

 

Well the agreement is questionable ..... it does not contain all the prescribed terms also your signature is not within the the prescribed terms of the agreement nor is there a link to connect the T&Cs with the agreement.

 

They have still to disclose a Notice of Assignment also.

 

So its your call.... if you think you can argue the merits of my points above in front of a court you ignore their letter if not you can approach them to try to settle this by way of a Tomlin Order and affordable repayment plan...this will will avoid a CCJ and put you back to pre litigation.

 

You had 14 days in which to decide...if they proceed to Summary Judgment they may well attain success unless you can throw any other argument into the ring.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Andy

I deleted my signature, which is alongside the date on the second page of the agreement (if that's what you are referring to)

What is a Notice of Assignment - I shall check to see if that is within the paperwork they sent me.

Also, what is a Tomlin Order?

Also, should they proceed to Summary Judgement what happens?

Please accept my apologies for the questions. I feel I have let you down as you have been so helpful, and I just totally didn't follow it through, not for just one reason, but that really is no excuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see therefore it is enforcable...a notice of assignment is when the claimant purchased the debt from the original creditor.

A Tomlin Order is a consent to stay the claim subject to you agreeing the schedule of the terms and agreeing a payment plan.Its probably the next best outcome that you could hope to achieve now.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit: cross posted. Wrote this not knowing Andy had picked up. Sorry

 

 

Hi again Ingrid

 

I can't stick around now so this just a brief visit. I'm sure Andy will be back before too long.

 

Any time you meet a term like Tomlin try the library or search box before enquiring here: it will often answer your question.

 

Don't let thoughts of court deter you if you feel your case has merit and you would want to fight. Half the trick is to construct a solid well argued written defence.

 

I'm writing from phone and can't see your attachments so I can't at present add to Andy's comments on the agreement you've been sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband has just posed this question:

 

"As I understand it Drydens had 14 days to come up with the signed CCA, which they didn't do. Almost 5 months later they write saying that they have the signed CCA and are asking for offers of payment. They have not gone to the Court at this point, asking for the stay to be lifted as yet.

Can we not write to the Court now and ask for the claim to be struck out before Drydens apply for the stay to be lifted, ie is there a time limit on asking for it to be struck out.

Surely if they were confident of a win they would have gone to the Court to ask for the stay to be lifted rather than come straight to my wife to ask for payment."

 

I understand what he means, inasmuch as they had 14 days to provide the proof, they didn't. They are the people who deal with this every day but didn't follow procedures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you could but it would be pointless as they are now prepared......stable doors horse bolted spring to mind.Yes you are correct they have only intimated their intentions at this stage but that is purely to save costs and court time should you wish to settle and is expected by the court.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought so, hubby just thought it might have been worth a go given that they weren't compliant. So it's also not worth asking if they have a copy of the original agreement then? I suppose it's just dragging out the inevitable. Hubby is still telling me I should write to the Court asking for is to be struck out, but I suspect they will contact Drydens who can argue that they won't allow it. Would that be right?

 

I'll apologise now Andy, for not taking your advice - you have helped me with the best of intentions, and I feel I have let you down too. I really wished I'd understood more about the striking off, but I didn't.

 

Anyway, back to the next step! Do you think they'd accept a f&f settlement, and what sort of amount do you think they'd accept (I have already mentioned my m-i-l has offered in order to help me) Same with a monthly payment too, as I don't want to offer more than I can realistically afford.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are they not compliant? Of course they will object to your application to strike out...they have now you... allowed them to....so a waste of £80.

 

You really need to approach them now and start the ball rolling on negotiation...suggest a payment plan that is realistic and affordable if they are not interested in F&FS.

If you can get a Tomlin Order in place it will avoid a CCJ and maybe costs subject to your negotiation skills.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a debt of £6k what would be a realistic offer of settlement? Do I only get one shot, they throw it back at me and ask the Court to remove the stay?

Basically, I'd have to borrow from a family member and funds would be limited (I have no savings of my own) How negotiable at these people?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends if you are considering a F&FS or a monthly payment plan...I personally would go with the second option and offer £30/45 per month.(if affordable)

They all vary Ingrid but they all have one thing in common...greed.So some would jump at say 60% as a F&FS as its cash up front were as monthly is payment on the drip and they did not buy your delinquent debt to be paid on the drip.

 

The important thing is to negotiate a good deal that is affordable and avoids a judgment (preferably without costs)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How negotiable they are depends on their assessment of your financial situation, so it's hard to judge where to pitch any offer you may make.

.

Could you please keep us informed as to how this all pans out, even if you don't need further advice? People as you know read threads to learn of others' experiences and it's always a shame when they end with no ending.

.

I'm sorry that you look like having to pay Capquest. I loathe them for some of their tactics. It's such a pity that you gave them chance to manoeuvre against you.

.

Best of luck with the negotiations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, thank you! So I shall be putting together an offer letter this weekend, sending it out Monday. Do I just make an offer, or do I have to detail my income/monthly expenditure to back the offer up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...