Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SD for school fees from redwoods - help? - ** RESOLVED **


mr1967
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been referred to this site and told there are som great people who can help me?

 

In short, my income has been hit by the credit crunch since 2009 and since we have run into all kinds of difficulties.

 

 

Our house was repossessed in the summer wirh an outright repossesion order.

We were able to clear the arrears and have been up to date since

so the mortgage company has agreed in writing not to enforce as ling as payments remain up to date.

 

This morning we received a statutory demand under section 268(1)a relating to £25k we owe.

This is for school fees from when we had money and adverse circumstances and has been issued by the school through Redwoods.

The school has been very patient with us and my understanding was that Redwoods would look to arrange a payment plan with us.

 

 

I would like to get some answers to the following:

 

1. Does this mean they have filed for bankruptcy?

This is an official document but not from the court.

There is also no court date given, although the local court is mentioned.

 

2. We have been given 18 days to respond from the date of service, which is 14th October.

This only gives us 6 days to respond, so can we contest why it took so long for us to receive the letter?

 

3. Given that an outright repossesion order is in place,

would Redwoods be able to bankrupt us and enforce sale of the property?

Surely the mortgage company have priority on this?

 

Any helpful information would be gratefully received. Thanks, D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

A SD is the first step to bankruptcy. You say the school is being patient, so you need to find out why the SD is issued. If the school sold the debt on, then there is something VERY wrong with the debt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG .A statutory demand is the first step in the BR process, unless it is satisfied or set aside by a court the creditor can issue a petition to bankrupt you.

I take you mean 14 NOV to respond?

 

I'm sure others will be along to advise when available.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG .A statutory demand is the first step in the BR process, unless it is satisfied or set aside by a court the creditor can issue a petition to bankrupt you.

I take you mean 14 NOV to respond?

 

I'm sure others will be along to advise when available.

 

No, it was issued 14th October, we received it today and we have 18 days from 14th October, which is next week!

 

Does the repossession affect their ability to bankrupt us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A SD is the first step to bankruptcy. You say the school is being patient, so you need to find out why the SD is issued. If the school sold the debt on, then there is something VERY wrong with the debt.

The creditor is listed as the school so I assume they haven't sold it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the school sold the debt on, then there is something VERY wrong with the debt.

 

This is simply subjective puff. A creditor can pass a debt to a DCA in whatever circumstances they like. And Schools often do enlist DCAs from my experience, but the usually just get the DCA to do the chasing (whilst they remain the creditor) - as the above posts affirms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i meant seq was that due to the amount owing, youd have to check the debt very carefully.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is simply subjective puff. A creditor can pass a debt to a DCA in whatever circumstances they like. And Schools often do enlist DCAs from my experience, but the usually just get the DCA to do the chasing (whilst they remain the creditor) - as the above posts affirms.

So what should i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the mortgage company have rights over this creditor regarding the property?

 

No. If the bankruptcy goes ahead you're very likely to lose the house.

 

You'll need to either negotiate affordable payments that they accept or consider offering a voluntary charge on the property. The beauty of the latter is that you can seek a contractual agreement to have furtehr interest and charges frozen and an agreement not to ever seek an order to sell the property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly who is the DCA?

 

Also sequenci is right... Youll lose the house as it is an asset you own regardless of if mortgaged.

However also like Sequenci said its put you in a unique situation...

 

How much can you afford realistically to pay towards the 25k per month?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. If the bankruptcy goes ahead you're very likely to lose the house.

 

You'll need to either negotiate affordable payments that they accept or consider offering a voluntary charge on the property. The beauty of the latter is that you can seek a contractual agreement to have furtehr interest and charges frozen and an agreement not to ever seek an order to sell the property.

 

I'm very surprised that a repossesion order that is in force can be superceded but that really is bad news!

 

What about the fact that we only have 6 days now to respond because of delay in receiving the demand tonight.

 

Surely that isn't right?

 

I will look at a charging order with the lender, but what else can we do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very surprised that a repossesion order that is in force can be superceded but that really is bad news! What about the fact that we only have 6 days now to respond because of delay in receiving the demand tonight. Surely that isn't right? I will look at a charging order with the lender, but what else can we do?

 

We suggested a voluntary charge with the school before and they were open to it, but the repossession case took our focus off of this. I will phone the mortgage company on Monday - is there anything else we can do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly who is the DCA?

 

Also sequenci is right... Youll lose the house as it is an asset you own regardless of if mortgaged.

However also like Sequenci said its put you in a unique situation...

 

How much can you afford realistically to pay towards the 25k per month?

 

At the moment nothing, but the irony is that I am starting a new job as a mortgage broker in 2 weeks. The reason for the meltdown was because of the market and this is the first job in 4 years which realistically gives us a very good chance of earning good money in 2-3 months. At that time £500 per month could be feasible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment nothing, but the irony is that I am starting a new job as a mortgage broker in 2 weeks. The reason for the meltdown was because of the market and this is the first job in 4 years which realistically gives us a very good chance of earning good money in 2-3 months. At that time £500 per month could be feasible.

 

You have 18 days from the date the SD was received to apply for the set aside.

 

You need to avoid bankruptcy, as I think you may struggle to keep the job as a Mortgage Advisor if you are bankrupted. If you are employed within financial services, your personal financial conduct can lead to your employment being ended. Working in Insurance, I have come across staff having problems when they just have a CCJ against them.

 

For this reason, you have to take this situation very seriously and I would suggest that you obtain formal legal advice from a Solicitor that deals with debt issues.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 18 days from the date the SD was received to apply for the set aside.

 

You need to avoid bankruptcy, as I think you may struggle to keep the job as a Mortgage Advisor if you are bankrupted. If you are employed within financial services, your personal financial conduct can lead to your employment being ended. Working in Insurance, I have come across staff having problems when they just have a CCJ against them.

 

For this reason, you have to take this situation very seriously and I would suggest that you obtain formal legal advice from a Solicitor that deals with debt issues.

 

I agree with this right here,,, just having a CCJ can cause huge issues, while being bankrupt can throw you to the wolves...

Right,... Id say £500 is way to much to kick off £300 a month for a debt of that size is viable

 

If you are able to avoid bankruptcy then you could raise the amount you are paying / will be paying to help clear it quicker...

I would assume the SD offers you the opportunity to come to payment arrangements with the School / Solicitors etc

 

While we can assist here Sequenci is right...

Because the debt isnt something like a loan or credit card debt etc... its harder to really help as with those a DMP is perfect if its too much

 

But £25k for school fees, i would say legal advice would be great idea for you.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 18 days from the date the SD was received to apply for the set aside.

 

You need to avoid bankruptcy, as I think you may struggle to keep the job as a Mortgage Advisor if you are bankrupted. If you are employed within financial services, your personal financial conduct can lead to your employment being ended. Working in Insurance, I have come across staff having problems when they just have a CCJ against them.

 

For this reason, you have to take this situation very seriously and I would suggest that you obtain formal legal advice from a Solicitor that deals with debt issues.

 

Also I thought that was the case from the date youve received it to have it set aside.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 18 days from the date the SD was received to apply for the set aside.

 

You need to avoid bankruptcy, as I think you may struggle to keep the job as a Mortgage Advisor if you are bankrupted. If you are employed within financial services, your personal financial conduct can lead to your employment being ended. Working in Insurance, I have come across staff having problems when they just have a CCJ against them.

 

For this reason, you have to take this situation very seriously and I would suggest that you obtain formal legal advice from a Solicitor that deals with debt issues.

 

My future employer knows my current history and as they are directly authorised, they have bankrupts they have employed in the past, but I do understand your point.

 

I had assumed the school would apply for a charging order or CCJ, not bankruptcy to end all hopes. They know we have 4 kids and have tried to resolve this. Should I talk to Redwoods or the school direct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speak to the school direct and cut out redwoods....

Although they may be specialist in legal action, they still have no rights if they haven't bought the debt

 

I have the feeling they aren't a Debt sale company but more a Debt administrator, so the original Creditor will be the School and will still be that even though Redwoods have sent a SD

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there are grounds to even consider a set aside here, if the money is owing then it's more important to concentrate on ways to prevent a creditor's petition. I know a voluntary charge isn't everyones' cup of tea - but if it protects the house then it's the lesser of two evils, if you see what I mean? School fees are unlikely to be challengeable from a technical perspective in the same way as credit cards and loans etc. unless, of course, you entered in to a personal loan with a finance firm to cover the fees (I've seen this in the past).

 

I could be worth seeking legal advice, though, and as the others have mentioned ensure that they're up on consumer debt issues. If there is a law centre near you they're very good - and free:

 

http://www.lawcentres.org.uk/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, not looking too good at the moment.

 

 

Spoke to Redwoods to put forward a proposal of £150 per month to be reviewed after 3 months

when I should hopefully have more income coming in.

 

 

They said the school was looking for more like £2,000 per month, but that they would put my offer forward.

As it is half term we won't hear back until next Monday.

Redwoods confirmed the 21 days starts from when SD was received, not dated, so that gives us a bit longer.

 

I spoke to my mortgage company to see if they would do a voluntary charge but each case needs to be submitted and assessed individually,

so I don't know if that will be viable or not.

I also spoke to an IVA company, but this needs a fixed, provable income with a slight surplus.

 

Any other ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't deal with Redwoods... Deal with the school!

 

Redwoods will say anything! You cannot be expected to pay 2k a month, that's just unreasonable.

 

Remember although this isn't a credit debt, Redwoods are still regulated heavily and if £150 a month with review after 3 months isn't good enough then the judge will lean to yoir side...

 

That's because you are making an effort to pay this :-)

 

Keep going and don't let them win.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...