Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Domestic and General unauthorised DD - taken over £450 from me! Help!


MissNomes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm hoping that someone can help me here.

 

I have just been sorting through my Direct Debits and have realised that I have been paying a DD monthly to Dom and Gen for 4 years

and I actually have no idea what for.

 

I realise that I must have agreed to some kind of warranty cover with them initially,

but I also know that I have no warranties on any of my appliances that are currently active so I have no need for this cover.

 

I am utterly confused and crestfallen because I am absolutely meticulous about keeping records of all correspondence on these things,

and have folders full of this type of info

but I have no letter at all from Dom and Gen that suggest that the cover is ongoing

or that an automatic renewal of the cover will be happening.

 

In addition to this, the cover started at £6.34 per month in March 2009 and has increased in amount every year since then, they are now taking £9.30 from me!

 

I have now cancelled the DD with my bank, but I really can't understand how it is OK for this to have happened.

 

I am usually so careful with these things,

but I tend to rely on correspondence that I get about these things to trigger my action,

and I haven't received any.

 

I read elsewhere on this site that companies MUST inform you of any change in the amount that your direct debit is,

and this has definitely NOT happened, as it would have alerted me to the fact that the DD was active for no reason that I was aware of.

 

I am really upset and feel badly taken advantage of.

 

I know I should have noticed the DD was there, but I have a large number of DDs set up for various reasons

and I must have just stopped questioning it because it's a relatively small amount and has been taken for so long.

 

I'm really kicking myself, but surely there should have been some contact or correspondence from them?

 

I'm going to write a letter to my bank and to D&G now, but any advice or support would be appreciated greatly.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing would be to contact D&G and ask them for the information relating to this insurance. I have my washing machine covered with them and the amount taken has never increased, but i will now keep an eye on that. I dont remember if i set it up over the phone but im am 100% sure they did send paper work out relating to the insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

phone your bank

 

get it all refunded under the DD guarantee

 

if someone is taking money from your account

 

they MUST write to you and inform you

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no limit an the DD guarantee other than p'haps sec32

 

thank you annie71

 

i'll await the sidekick now

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks folks. I've contacted D&G and I'll phone my bank asap too. There has definitely been no correspondence each month, nor was there contact each year that the value went up. I'll let you know how it goes!

Nx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi, Ive just become aware that a similar situation has developed with a policy that i took out on a camera i bought at jessops, with 2 year cover. I never recieved the renewal notice and by chance saw the regualr amount they had been taking out for 3 years since it experied. I have phoned them, and they state their system says they sent out the letter each year, and as i didnt reply kept the policy live. I didnt recieve the letter. On friday their customer services team said they would refund the last year, and then inquire about escalting the complaint. Today they called and said they can only give me a letter of apology, and no refund and keep sayingh the same thing 'our system says we sent the letter', and i kept saying i havent recieved them to be able to make an informed choice of whether i want to continue, which i didnt, i had it insured by CIS insurance instead. I feel this is outrageous...if i had not of noticed i could have been paying for the years and years to come, no other insurance company does this. Is this legal, and why is it not written in big letters when you take out the policy. I shoudl have been informed at the point of selling.

 

I used to work at the financial services authority and this feel wrong to me . Can anyone provide help or advice ?

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tajindersingh

 

 

Hi, Ive just become aware that a similar situation has developed with a policy that i took out on a camera i bought at jessops, with 2 year cover. I never recieved the renewal notice and by chance saw the regualr amount they had been taking out for 3 years since it experied. I have phoned them, and they state their system says they sent out the letter each year, and as i didnt reply kept the policy live. I didnt recieve the letter. On friday their customer services team said they would refund the last year, and then inquire about escalting the complaint. Today they called and said they can only give me a letter of apology, and no refund and keep sayingh the same thing 'our system says we sent the letter', and i kept saying i havent recieved them to be able to make an informed choice of whether i want to continue, which i didnt, i had it insured by CIS insurance instead. I feel this is outrageous...if i had not of noticed i could have been paying for the years and years to come, no other insurance company does this. Is this legal, and why is it not written in big letters when you take out the policy. I shoudl have been informed at the point of selling.

 

I used to work at the financial services authority and this feel wrong to me . Can anyone provide help or advice ?

 

T

 

 

Although this is a similar thread to the one originally posted you really should start your own thread as the advice on two within one thread could cause confusion...

 

 

Welcome to CAG...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

start a new thread

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...