Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Eviction notice now served.


Capt Slog
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello anyone. I have posted on another thread under message header NRAM & Wallers as I hadn't seen this thread. Don't know if it is possible for admin bods to move and merge threads please.

Anyway latest news now is that we have been sent an eviction notice, N54, with date of just under 4 weeks from today. Any ideas of how to overcome this. Having read other threads I have already printed out the N244 and advice sheet. I know we can't do anything courtwise until Monday but at least we will have the weekend to get the rude names for NRAm off our chest. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responses. My initial post is on Mortgages and secured loans forum. When we first had the suspended repossession order we were paying a new sum plus an amount towards the arrears. According to the other half, it is in their name and not a joint mortgage, things were OK until August. Due to a finger fault on their part they underpaid by £50. We did not realise this until we got a letter from Wallers saying that has we had not maintained the court order they were going for repossession. Urgent phone calls to NRAM ended with them saying that we had broken the order but they could see that the history was good and that even the following payment was OK. Acting on their advice we waited to see how this under payment could be made up. It seems this is their response. We are in a financial difficulties and we are following much of the advice given out on this site. i.e. getting CCAs from our creditors, or not, which has enabled us budget in a more controlled manner. Now this has come along. Without talking to NRAM I really do not know where to go but the other half seems reluctant and doesn't seem to want to talk about it even to me. Thanks for advice given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may not need to talk to NRAM. If there's a SPO in place you just need to go ahead and apply on the n244 to seek another suspended order, so long as you can clear the arrears within the rest of the mortgage term you should be good to go (if you're not already aware of it read about Cheltenham & Gloucester v Norgan on that fact sheet I posted up). The court might want to know why the arrangement breached BUT they should be keen to allow you to stay so long as you can meet the arrangements.

 

As far as your 'non-priority' creditors are concerned offer a pound a month to those (if the CCA route hasn't worked for them, of course).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks sequenci. According to the other half the breach occurred because when they entered the amount on the phone keypad they pressed the zero instead of the five. This meant that the payment was £50 pound short that month. Next thing we knew was a letter from Wallers saying NRAM were going for repossession. The usual attempts at phone calls (timed out after how long ringing) and when we did get through the bloke on the other side said even he could see it was a genuine mistake. All payments since the error have been for the full amount, set out by the court when they received the suspended repossession order. We will attempt to fill in N244 this afternoon and take it to the court tomorrow. Thanks again for the help and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Decided to contact the people who the link above related to and spoke in detail with them, waited for their info to arrive and read through it first. Form has been filled in and we are taking it tomorrow morning. The bod on the helpline did mention to put in about C&G v Norgan but the OH can't remember if it is a loan or the mortgage that is in arrears that we are paying off. Either way we have nothing to lose by stating it I suppose. Can't believe all this hassle over a £48.27 shortfall caused by a simple finger fault. We round the figure up to the nearest £50 so does that mean that we have broken the court agreement right from the beginning? Thanks again for the advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Success!!!!!!!!!!!

First it was the same judge who had given the original suspended possession order so didn't feel too good. The judge then asked why they were seeking the P.O. Their rep went on to say there was a history of 4 missed payments so we were a bad risk. The first time the judge spoke to us he said he wasn't interested in the £50 shortfall in August. He noted that the arrears, which their case was based on, had been greatly reduced to almost half what they had been 3 years ago.The question was asked to their lawyer " Isn't usually when the arrears increase that you seek eviction?"

We then had a chance to show that there had not been any missed payments, but it was down to NRAMs method of taking the money and allocating it, i.e. a two day delay from receiving to allocation. The judge basically said that they were incompetent and he couldn't believe the draconian methods employed by them in pursuit of arrears which had been getting less. He also commented on how their figures didn't match the original PO hearing and for us to check if NRAM have capitalised the arrears, which would make for a new set of figures to be arrived at and possibly the removal of the original P.O.

I ALMOST felt sorry for their rep who didn't have any other notes apart from some docs scanned onto his iPad. Plus he hadn't filled in some paper work before the hearing as he was too busy catching up with another lawyer about life, the universe and everything. Following that I ended up only having to wait a couple of minutes for a bus that runs hourly = Result.

Thanks for all your help, advice and support

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...