Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VT'd car through welcome, they claimed damage, lowells claim form !!**TOMLIN**


swt61
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3028 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I am sending my car back under the V.T rules to welcome Finance

 

today I had a guy come to do an inspection from the RAC on behalf of the finance company his findings were:-

 

Stone chips to Front Bumper

stone chips to Bonnet

 

Scratch to nsr wing( This scratch was on the car when I originally purchased the car)

 

I bought the car 2 yaers ago with 96,000 Miles on the clock it has now done 113,000 MIles and the car is in better condition now that when I bought it.

 

I have Full Audi service history wirth the car & surely a car with this mileage on it is expected to have this type of stone chip damage as i accepted it at 96,000 Miles with stone chip damage.

 

The RAC man asked me to sign for the damage which i refused to do so as I would be agreeing to paying the £500 to rectify the damage he quoted.

 

They are having a laugh surely,

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Simon,

 

I probably can't post the link on here, but look up the BVRLA Fair Wear & Tear guide on t'internet. This is the voluntary code published by The British Vehicle Rental & Leasing Association and allows everyone to know what to expect when returning a leased vehicle.

 

Although I doubt Welcome subscribe to this code, it does set out the degree of expectation in respect of what 'reasonable condition' should amount to.

 

For example, light scratches of no more than 25mm in length and not down to bare metal should be regarded as acceptable.

 

If they are expecting you to pay for conditions outside of this then IMO they are being unreasonable/unfair, and you may well have grounds to challenge it.

 

Hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Simon,

 

I probably can't post the link on here, but look up the BVRLA Fair Wear & Tear guide on t'internet. This is the voluntary code published by The British Vehicle Rental & Leasing Association and allows everyone to know what to expect when returning a leased vehicle.

 

Although I doubt Welcome subscribe to this code, it does set out the degree of expectation in respect of what 'reasonable condition' should amount to.

 

For example, light scratches of no more than 25mm in length and not down to bare metal should be regarded as acceptable.

 

If they are expecting you to pay for conditions outside of this then IMO they are being unreasonable/unfair, and you may well have grounds to challenge it.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Thanks Ron,

 

I have just had a quick look the bad scratch on my rear wing was on the car when I bought it & so were quite a few stone chips then it states stone chips are acceptable but it does not say how many

The car has been on the motorway all of its life & every garage I have spoken to has said that any vehicle with this kind of mileagwe will obviously have stone chip damage.

 

I will fight this all the way,

 

Simon

Edited by swt61
Link to post
Share on other sites

They are trying to shaft me big time here I just took some high res images of the supposed stone chips unbelievable I can hardly see them.

 

I could possibly shaft them back as when I requested a copy of my credit agreement from them they sent me mine and someone elses agreement with all their personal details on it:eek:

 

I did call them weeks ago to tell them this and the guy went very silent on the phone & then said oh thanks for bringing it to our attention please post it back to us & we will refund your postage cost, I said yeah right oh I will lol:p

 

I still have this copy which is not mine.

 

Shaft them back deeper & hatrder I think comes to mind lol:D

 

Any suggestions anyone ?

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took the car to a local Bodyshop today to ask their advice they looked at my car and said that there was nothing wrong with it & they felt that the RAC were taking the p**s. They are putting there findings in writing for me nothing is on the car that is not normal wear and tear,

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took the car to a local Bodyshop today to ask their advice they looked at my car and said that there was nothing wrong with it & they felt that the RAC were taking the p**s. They are putting there findings in writing for me nothing is on the car that is not normal wear and tear,

 

Simon

Sounds like you have got balance of opinion on your side.

 

You now need to write back to them and advise them that you do not agree with the findings of the RAC report (stating your reasons). You should supply a copy of your own report and also mention the industry standard for vehicle conditoins (as I mentioned before).

 

Remind them of the mileage the vehicle has covered, and that the vehicle's condition can take this into account.

 

Tell them what you are prepared to pay, assuming that there is still a sum outstanding in relation to your VT obligation, and then advise them that will be it.

 

If they have got any sense they will accept this position and realise that they on a sticky wicket. They have no grounds to refuse your request to terminate, and you can them leave the vehicle at their nearest branch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, I received a copuy of my CCA from Welcome Finance but also under seperate envelope I got someone elses CCA it was addressed to me I called Welcome to explain what had happened & they went very quiete on the phone & said thanks for bringing it to our attention please post it back & we will refund you the postage. Yeah Damn Right i will ( NOT) I have an issue currently with Welcome as I am V.T ing my car I owe them £453.00 to end the agreement plus they want to try and shaft me for stone chips on the car that has done 113k :p

 

If a copy breaches ther DATA protection act how much could it cost them financially?

 

I may have the upper hand here,

 

Thanks,

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simon....send it to the Information Commissioners Office..and also send it to the person named on the agreement stating that it was sent to you....

 

 

o.k will do

 

thanks:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi Everyone,

 

Well as you can see from the dates that this now has been going on for a Year nearly

 

The car went back eventually spoke to welcome about not paying for the damage

and they eventually agreed so I started paying them £30 a month off the Deb.

 

Then out of the Blue about 4 months ago a really snotty girl rang me to say that she wanted the debt ckleared

including the amount for the damages to the car as far as she was concerned it had not been written off

 

I told her I was not paying it so i stopped the payments.

 

I did tell her that when I asked for a copy of my cca they sent me someone elses in error

 

she went very silent and asked could I post it back

 

I said no way

 

she then stated that I was breaking the law by keeping it & she could call around and collect it I still said no way I will keep it safe for the Court.

 

I requested that she send me mine and a full statement of account which has never arrived.

 

The next thing I get is a letter then a phone call from Lewis Debt recovery I told them the situation in no uncertain terms on the phone & they said oh please take it back up with Welcome.

 

I have now today received a Court threat letter from Howard Cohen solicitors asking for the full amount what can i do ?

 

Thanks,

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi, in 2008 I used my right to terminate my hire purchase agreement with welcome finance as I had paid half to total amount payable, I received a letter stating that they would send the rac around to inspect the car. The rac guy arrived and guess what he decided to list damages lol.

 

Stone chips to front of bonnet £120

Front Bumper chips £120

scratch to rear wing £120

oil top up £10

Labour £ 279.20

total inc vat of £746.58.

 

I refused to sign for these damages as the car had 113,516miles and these were age related marks, I bought the car with over 90k miles on it & they never insisited before they loaned me an inspection. I immediately took the car to a body shop who confirmed in writing these were more tan acceptable for this mileage and the scratch was there originallythere when I bought it.

 

I battled with them for ages even after they had collected the car that these charges were not acceptable, but it kept going on and on for ages, I requested a copy of my CCA and they sent me someone else's credit agreement in full lol, I contacted and they panicked and said please send it back! I never did as I was sure one day they may try to go to court, eventually they stopped contacting me last letter was Feb 2009. I have never received an annual statement since Nov 2008 showing any sums owed.

 

Now they have sold the so called debt on which now has crept up to £1565.26

 

Lowell have issued me a CCj form now for this debt. I rang Lowell/BW legal yesterday and asked them what they knew about this so called debt the lady said you owe money on a finance agreement but when I explained the background of it she said I will have to speak to my client now and get back to you asap. I called welcome finance and asked them why I had not received any letters or statements from them if I still owed them money the lady at welcome said we don't have to send you any but I cannot discuss further as your debt has been sold on

 

I have screen shots of my credit file showing the welcome finance loan and it was never marked as defaulted but it clearly shows that in 2012 this account has been satisfactorly closed.

 

What can I do ? I cannot sleep worrying that they will get away with this.

I can send someone screen dumps of my credit file if you wish to see to advise,

 

Thanks,

 

Simon

Edited by swt61
Link to post
Share on other sites

So Lowells have issued a claim against an assigned debt that you have been disputing with Welcome.

 

Did they advise the account had been assigned and did you make them aware there was a dispute with Welcome ?

 

How come this debt has doubled ? Were there interest and charges being added.

 

Can you let me know the following.

 

Date of issue of the claim - top right hand corner of the form

 

and..

 

Why they say they have issued the claim ..

 

:)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

the date of the issue is 14th Oct 2013

 

they claim form states :-

the claimants claim is for the amount of £1565.26

being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a credit agreement

regulated by the CCA 1974 between the defendant

and welcome financial services under account number *******

and assigned to the claimant on the 30/08/2012 notice was given to the defendant.

 

The defendant failed to maintain a contractual payment under the terms of the agreement

and a default notice has been served and not complied with.

 

The claim also includes statutory interest at a rate of 8.0% per annum from the date of the assignment of the agreement

to the date of issue 14/10/2013 being an amount of 119.19.

 

My credit file shows no default registered for the account

and I have not received one from welcome either.

 

In Dec 2009 lewis group tried to chase for the same thing

and after telling them it was not part of my finance agreement o

nly welcome trying it on for so called damages ther response was this :-

 

"

Dear Mr ****************

 

With regards to your recent email.

 

We have noted the account with your comments.

 

However, we feel that your email should be dealt with by Welcome Finance.

 

We have today returned this account to Welcome Finance, please contact them with further queries.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Lewis Debt Recovery"

 

Si

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have merged your old thread here for the history on this.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you ever send welcome an sar?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll need to PDF those attachments for us to see them properly

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had an interesting chat with BW Legal,

I just called her back as yesterday she said that she would go back to her client she said it could take sometime.

 

I said well I don't have time do I? as you have filed for a CCJ!

 

she said to go ahead and file a defence anyway which I will,

 

I then asked her

can you send me a copy of my CCA or any information that you hold for me regarding this so called debt.

 

The reply was we never had any documents for this they will still be with Welcome,

 

If we need them we will ask for them.

 

I said well surely if they sold the debt to you then you should hold my CCA etc

she said no I have nothing here for you.

 

What's the views on this ? :-)

 

regards,

 

Si

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh the judge will be pleased!!

 

issuing a speculative court claim whilst holding no documents nice!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I then asked her

can you send me a copy of my CCA or any information that you hold for me regarding this so called debt.

The reply was we never had any documents for this they will still be with Welcome,

If we need them we will ask for them.

Hmm, rather disingenuous, if they have issued the claim, then they need the paperwork to back it up !!

Ok,

Issue date 14th October + 5 for service = 19 October + 14 days to acknowledge = 2nd November + 14 days to submit defence = 16 November.

 

 

 

 

IMHO, your defence should be along the line of - this is not a debt owed via the original agreement. Having VT'd the vehicle, Welcome have attempted to obtain money by saying there was damage to the vehicle when it fact the wear and tear is acceptable according to BVRLA Fair Wear & Tear guide on t'internet. [This is the voluntary code published by The British Vehicle Rental & Leasing Association and allows everyone to know what to expect when returning a leased vehicle.]

 

When you asked for the copy of your agreement back in 2008/2009 (and they sent you someone else's) did you make that request via a proper CCA request that included the £1.00 statutory fee ?

 

You can mention that Welcome not only failed to comply with your s78 request, but sent you someone else's agreement (with their personal details on it).

 

You really must stay off the telephone. I doubt very much they will do anything about retrieving your Agreement until you make a proper request. I have linked you to the CPR 31.14 request that you need to send to the Solicitors.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387484-LEGAL-CPR-31.14-Request-Request-for-information-when-a-Claim-has-been-issued.

 

It needs reading carefully and amended where required. You need to send it Recorded delivery.

 

You can only ask for the following documents as these are mentioned in their claim.

 

1: the agreement

2: the default notice

3: the notice of assignment

4: statement of account showing how the balance claimed has accrued.

 

Do you have a copy of the RAC report and the photographs of the stone chip damage ? ?

  • Confused 1

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh the judge will be pleased!!

 

issuing a speculative court claim whilst holding no documents nice!

 

Am I correct in recalling somewhere it stated that if a debt has been sold on

or assigned to another dca they MUST have full documents regarding my account before taking legal action.

 

if they do not hold anything they are not allowed to then contact the original lender for these documents

as they should have been given at the time of assigning the debt to them ??

 

Thanks,

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...