Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is it an appeal??


bedofweeds
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3836 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm a bit stumped on this one. Maybe somebody that works for the DWP can give me a definitive answer.

 

Facts:

 

GL24 issued with a covering letter dated 3rd November 2012 (date stamped by the DWP as being received on the 30th November 2012).

 

I was appealing against two decisions, one dated 2009 (decision notice sent to wrong address and never received it) and another decision notice dated 6th December 2011.

 

I lost the former at a Tribunal as it was out of date and that the decision notice was sent to the 'last known address'- I'm OK with that.

The latter the DWP refused to accept that it was a 'proper' appeal.

 

In July 2013, the DWP suggested that I should lodge another GL24 against the December 2011 decision notice. This I did and it too has been thrown out as being out of time.

 

This all now hinges on the covering letter and GL24 sent to the DWP on the 3rd November 2012 - is it a proper appeal notice.

 

The GL24 states "name of benefit - ******, date at the top of the letter about the decision - No idea, have not seen the notice, as it was never received by me".

 

The covering letter attached to the GL24 states "This appeal form is also to cover the decision made on the 6th December 2011"

 

As you can see the GL24 clearly referred to the 2009 decision, but that I added by way of a paragraph in my letter that it should also relate to the December 2011 decision.

 

The DWP are refusing to accept that it is an appeal as it is not on shown on the GL24. The DWP are well aware what would happen if they allowed the November letter as an appeal - it would open the flood gates - a considerable amount of money is riding on this £15,000 +. I was told unofficially by a DM that they will 'fight tooth and nail' to close me down along with the money.

 

In the end it's not about the money but more a point of principle. I view it as you can't lose something if you have never had it. If the DWP are made to accept it as a valid appeal which will bring about the payment, I intend to give it all to charity - seriously. I have no need for it as it will take our savings to well over £25,000 and play havoc with the Pension Credit review next June. Yes I know all about deprivation and will worry about that when the time comes - I want the DWP to make the payment direct to a charity of my choice.

 

Any thoughts or ideas please?

Edited by bedofweeds
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sent them something in writing stating you wanted to appeal a stated decision, then that counts as made.

 

If you have the evidence that you made the appeal (for instance if you've SAR'd the DWP and this attached piece of paper is in their records) then make the appeal direct to the Tribunal's service, showing that you had previously made the appeal in good time and was ignored.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sent them something in writing stating you wanted to appeal a stated decision, then that counts as made.

 

If you have the evidence that you made the appeal (for instance if you've SAR'd the DWP and this attached piece of paper is in their records) then make the appeal direct to the Tribunal's service, showing that you had previously made the appeal in good time and was ignored.

 

Thanks. Yes what I quoted was the last paragraph of a two page letter sent to the DWP on the 3rd November 2012.That letter was part of the Tribunal submission and was in the bundle that they sent me so yes, they did receive the letter. The DWP are insisting that whilst I made reference to the appeal in the letter, it was not made on the 'appropriate appeal form' and as I had issued a GL24 subsequently, I have accepted that the application in December 2012 was never made formal until after the 13 month appeal period had expired.Their evidence for this is that on the GL24 issued to them in July 2013, I didn't actually state that it was an appeal against the December 2011 decision but "an appeal to lodge an appeal against the December 2011 decision as it is now beyond the 13month period". In other words I concede that no formal appeal was made against the December 2011, as why else would someone try to lodge another one at a much later date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After rereading your original post, I'm a little confused. You wouldn't go to a Tribunal to be told an appeal was out of time - it might be referred to the Tribunal service for a decision, but it wouldn't, in my experience, be made at a Tribunal hearing.

 

Regardless, it is ultimately up to the Tribunal Service as to whether an appeal was properly made - so ask for it to be referred to them for a decision - simple.

  • Haha 1

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

After rereading your original post, I'm a little confused. You wouldn't go to a Tribunal to be told an appeal was out of time - it might be referred to the Tribunal service for a decision, but it wouldn't, in my experience, be made at a Tribunal hearing.

 

Regardless, it is ultimately up to the Tribunal Service as to whether an appeal was properly made - so ask for it to be referred to them for a decision - simple.

 

The first appeal (application to admit a late appeal against the 2009 decision) went to a Tribunal and they decided that the appeal would fail on two parts. That the decision notice was sent to the wrong address but the DWP had complied with what was required of them - posted to the last known address and in any event the appeal was out of time.

 

The second appeal (against the 2011 decision notice) has been ruled out of time (GL24 issued 2013) by the DWP so it ended there quite rightly. But I did appeal albeit in a letter and not on a GL24 in 2012 (within the 13 month period) but the DWP are ignoring it saying that it wasn't actually made in the prescribed manner on the correct form which I also accept.

 

My question surrounds that 2nd appeal made in letter form - are the DWP within their rights to ignore it or should I have 'pushed' the matter in late 2012/early 2013 instead of accepting what they said and putting in a GL24 out of time. I feel that I have shot myself in the foot here by listening to the DWP too much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye. Sometimes it's like finding hensteeth. ...

 

I'm getting fed up. And none of us are getting any younger.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...