Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

landlord Threat and harassment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received this email from my landlord " I will issue a writ at the studio where your

where you have not given notice.

 

when I get judgement I will make application for bankruptcy and then see if you think it’s amusing"

 

The landlord terminated my assured tenancy agreement on the 12 th August 2013 which gave me 2 months to move out, which I did on the 1 October 2013. His claim is that I didn't give him notice that I was moving out. The guy is crazy that is for sure.

 

He is also holding my deposit which he did not lodge with any of the organisations that you have to.I owe him nothing.

 

His plan is painfully clear, he threatens to issue a writ against me in full knowledge that I no longer live at the address, in fact I moved back to Holland on the 6th October and is where I live, my only reason for being and in the UK and renting a property was that it was I had a 6 months contract in the UK.

 

My concern is that I want to know if he goes ahead with his threat, there is no way that I will know, and the process will go on without my knowledge and he will proceed with a claim against me. It could be said that as I live in Holland I shouldn't care about it, but I still travel to and from the UK on business.

 

My question is can he do this, and is their a public database where claims are filed that I can access online.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would give him your new address. Also inform him that service on an address where you are known to no longer reside is not good service under the Civil Procedure Rules, and you will claim costs for a set aside if he proceeds. He would then have no excuse for serving proceedings on the old address.

 

I think bankruptcy is an empty threat. He would have to pay a deposit of £750 to proceed, as well as the court costs before he gets to that stage. However it still must be resisted since bankruptcy in the UK would also be a valid bankruptcy in Holland under the EU cross-border insolvency regulations (although legally any bankruptcy application should be brought in Holland not the UK).

 

Do you have written evidence that your AST was terminated on 12 August 2013?

 

If he was required to protect your deposit and did not do so, then bring a claim against him in small claims track for return of the deposit. I believe the penalty can be up to 3x the deposit. I doubt he will find that amusing and it would be worth a budget flight back to the UK for the hearing (and you could have a go at claiming the costs of that flight).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Steampowered for responding so quickly to my question.

 

In answer to your question re the termination of the Assured Tenancy Agreement, the answer is yes I have an email from him stating the fact.My address in Holland he also has as it was on the agreement.

 

Events have taken a new route today, as I responded to his threatening letter re the writ and bankruptcy, by pointing our to him the fact he would be wasting his time and money with legal action.I told him that I had documented proof of the termination email from and it seems to have stopped him in his tracks, as his response made no reference to it and he just continued to threaten me with how he was going to ruin me should I return to the UK etc etc.

 

As you said I doubt very much if he will do anything, it's just BS and bravado.

 

The other information you provided me with was extremely useful and appreciated, I still cannot understand a legal system that does not give you the ability to see if in my case not living in the UK, legal action can be taken and there is no way of finding out about it online.It seems wide open for abuse, someone claims against you, you live abroad, you have no idea about it, it goes through the courts and then a judgement is given and all the time you are oblivious of the fact. In my case, what would happen if I decided to return to live in the UK, I have lived in Holland for 40 years, and I needed credit, the judgement would be on record and that's when I would find out about it. Actually that is unlikely for me as I have no residence or domicile in the UK, but for others returning after 5 years say working abroad it could cause them problems and then they would haver to go through the hassle of getting the judgement set aside.

 

As for the bankruptcy threat, your right legally he would have to go after it in Holland which in itself would be long and laboriously costly process. In the Uk as I have discovered, a statutory demand has to be served in person in the UK.

 

Thanks again and I think this will disappear.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other information you provided me with was extremely useful and appreciated, I still cannot understand a legal system that does not give you the ability to see if in my case not living in the UK, legal action can be taken and there is no way of finding out about it online.It seems wide open for abuse, someone claims against you, you live abroad, you have no idea about it, it goes through the courts and then a judgement is given and all the time you are oblivious of the fact. In my case, what would happen if I decided to return to live in the UK, I have lived in Holland for 40 years, and I needed credit, the judgement would be on record and that's when I would find out about it. Actually that is unlikely for me as I have no residence or domicile in the UK, but for others returning after 5 years say working abroad it could cause them problems and then they would haver to go through the hassle of getting the judgement set aside.

 

Indeed. This problem is not just to do with people who move abroad. People in the UK face exactly the same issue if proceedings are issued against an old address or the wrong address. You would also face the same issue if someone sued you in Holland while you are living in the UK. The remedy would be to apply for the judgment to be set aside, accompanied by a costs order if the person who issued proceedings knew it was the wrong address. No way of avoiding hassle when you are in the court system I'm afraid.

 

Good luck with getting the deposit back ... and if he won't repay it then go ahead and sue him (though remember you'd have to come back to the UK for the hearing).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...