Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wescot help chasing old Mint [RBS] Credit Card Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3772 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

the owner will be shown on your CRA file

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Why would they write to you and ask for a signature?

 

Well if you send a digitally signed S78 request . That is what RBS do. There is no need for a signature , the law backs that up and once served the S78 request clock starts ticking. Until they comply they can not enforce by which time it should be SB

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

tough ignore wetcloths

they don't own the debt

and can do NOTHING to you.

 

they are NOT BAILIFFS

and have NO LEGAL POWERS.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tough ignore wetcloths

they don't own the debt

and can do NOTHING to you.

 

they are NOT BAILIFFS

and have NO LEGAL POWERS.

 

dx

 

So, in essence, Wetcloths (I love that) have no legal standing if my credit file shows RBS as the owners? I don't want to do nothing between now and April and acquire a nice juicy CCJ. RBS are not pursuing me directly. Does this mean that Wetcloths have paid a fee to RBS or would RBS normally use such Charlatans for debt collection?

 

Confused.com!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens is that Wets get a payment for any money collected. Of course the last thing you need is a CCJ. The first step is to get that CCA request sent off to RBS. I took them over 3 months to reply to mine, then you may have something to stop them enforcing. From the day they receive your CCA request they can not enforce until they comply...just don't ignore any letters

 

Do you by any chance have the default notice they sent you or any other correspondence from way back when

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens is that Wets get a payment for any money collected. Of course the last thing you need is a CCJ. The first step is to get that CCA request sent off to RBS. I took them over 3 months to reply to mine, then you may have something to stop them enforcing. From the day they receive your CCA request they can not enforce until they comply...just don't ignore any letters

 

Do you by any chance have the default notice they sent you or any other correspondence from way back when

 

Yes I have the default notice (I would need to check the file again but from memory, I got more than one).....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just been to the post office to send the CCA request to RBS today but something is niggling me. Before I do send it, can I just have a general opinion on the following:

 

Wets are the ones chasing me for the debt 'on behalf of their client'. In this case, shouldn't they be the ones to contact RBS to get the relevant information they need to pursue for said debt? I don't want to poke the bear by contacting RBS if I don't need to but then I don't want to sit and ignore something if I shouldn't either?

 

What would other people do?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the OFT say is that if the DCA is just collecting they should be open and fair, either tell you without delay who to send it to , or send it themselves. Seems to me they are just being a pain in the backside. However they did tell you to send it to RBS so you are doing the right thing.

 

Did you sign it or digitally sign it?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just been to the post office to send the CCA request to RBS today but something is niggling me. Before I do send it, can I just have a general opinion on the following:

 

Wets are the ones chasing me for the debt 'on behalf of their client'. In this case, shouldn't they be the ones to contact RBS to get the relevant information they need to pursue for said debt? I don't want to poke the bear by contacting RBS if I don't need to but then I don't want to sit and ignore something if I shouldn't either?

 

What would other people do?

 

Thanks

 

Side line Wescot try to get them out of the circle.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As has been advised before....ignore Wescot, they can do nothing to you.

 

Send the CCA to RBS.

 

But RBS are not pursuing me? Am I not lighting a beacon and waving it at them by even requesting this information? Surely if I'm just going to ignore Wescott, I would be better not even requesting the info? I imagine Westcott will come back to me again at some point between now and the SB date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In an earlier post you said you "don't want to do nothing between now and the SB date" i.e. April next year.

 

So that presupposes you want to do something.

 

That something should be to send a CCA request to RBS.

 

Ignore Westcot - they can do nothing to you.

 

It is really up to you now.....do you want to do something or wait it out until April?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I get what you're saying.

 

I guess part of me was wondering whether Westcott wouldn't do anything

because I was asking awkward questions

 

but RBS might push them if I gave them a nudge by requesting CCA.

 

Does that make sense?

 

I don't want to do nothing and end up the a CCJ through laziness.

 

It's far too close to the SB date for me to allow that to happen.

 

Will post the CCA request tomorrow and see what fruits that brings.

 

Thanks for all the replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS have their own debt collection arm anyway. The reason they farm it out is purely commercial. Even if you wescott had accepted your CCA request they would have had to pass it on to RBS as they do not have the documents you are requesting.

 

 

I understand that it is hard to follow the advice given when you are unfamiliar with what you are trying to achieve. I would say, trust the people on here that have done it before and learnt from there own mistakes. I am not saying I am an expert by any means but I sent 20 CCA requests in March last year and it has gotten a lot easier as time goes on. You only have a few months to keep them at arms length

Edited by fletch70

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats no problem. I do not profess to be an expert but can pass on my experience. Everyone has to deal with their debt in the best way that suits them and their circumstances. In many ways I am lucky in that I have no job or assets so nothing they can take off me however I do like to be secure in the legal process, after all I may get some money tomorrow and the last thing I would want is for those bar stewards to get it

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi everyone

 

Have received a letter back from Mint today but they have returned it "as we require your signature before we can proceed. Please sign your request for information and return to the address shown on the right hand side of this letter"

 

What do I do now? Do I have to send them a signature? Why do they need one?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't have to sign it and this is what RBS do all the time. It is just a stalling tactic.

 

You can if you wish sign it and use an anti tamper strip or sign it and put XXXXXXX through the signature or you can play hard ball.

I sent them this and they did comply

 

Dear Sirs

​Account No: XXXXXXXX*

Thank you for your letter dated XX/XX/XXXX, the contents of which have been noted. In your letter you make reference to requiring my signed authorisation before you will comply with my CCA Request.*

I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that the Consumer Credit Act 1974 does not require that I supply you a copy of my signature. If it is for Data Protection purposes then I can supply you with documentation to substantiate my identity to you. However, I note that to date you have been sending statements and correspondence containing sensitive information to my address. If you have doubts that you are corresponding with the wrong person, why has it taken you so long to raise this?*

As you are aware, disclosing data without adequate checks of identity is contrary to the 7th principle of Data Protection, listed in schedule 1 of the Data protection Act 1998:​

Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.​

There is no provision that removes the requirements of the Act to provide this information on time, even if you are unsure of my identity, therefore this account looks likely to become unenforceable until such time you actually respond to my lawful request for a copy of the agreement. I look forward to receiving the documentation requested, within the next 14 days.​

Yours faithfully,

Sign using a computer font

 

 

I actually have a complaint in as everytime I send a letter saying the account is in dispute I get the generic, we can not process your S78 request without a signature.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is absolutely no reason not to sign a CCA request, it is not a requirement but the RBS group require it for their purposes it cannot do any harm to provide it.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...