Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How much savings are you allowed before being penalised ?


mikv
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3844 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm currently filling out my housing benefit and have under £23,500 ( which I read somewhere was the cut off ) but reasonably close because I've not been out spending cash on things due to being housebound.

 

3000 of that is in Isa and the rest - or 15,000 -is in my current / saving accounts at the same bank.

 

Will this be penalised in an way. if I'm between say 18,000 and 23.5000 , and if so what are my options ?

 

thanks again ,

 

mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's usually a max of £16,000

 

so what happens if I transfer some ( I'm assuming they can find out ), or am I better just leaving it and arguing my case ?

 

mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £16,000 limit for means tested benefits isn't negotiable, so there's really no way to argue your case. The limit may be different if you are over pension age.

 

Please don't be tempted to attempt to hide the money somehow - that could be seen as fraud.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm currently filling out my housing benefit and have under £23,500 ( which I read somewhere was the cut off ) but reasonably close because I've not been out spending cash on things due to being housebound.

 

3000 of that is in Isa and the rest - or 15,000 -is in my current / saving accounts at the same bank.

 

Will this be penalised in an way. if I'm between say 18,000 and 23.5000 , and if so what are my options ?

 

thanks again ,

 

mike

By Law.

 

You have to declare ALL your savings/income's to HB dept and show them copies of your bank accounts,etc

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've been housebound and told them about it ( DWP ) and they awarded me what they saw fit which mounts to just over £2640 a year for mobility / transport.

 

But obviously if I am housebound thats not going to be used , unless I improve and get out , so how exactly do you do decide when to award that someone or not if their in such precarious position to start with , and their health situation can change from day to day ?

 

I dont see why someone should be penalised for something that was awarded to them if its was someone else's decision like the DWP, or why they should be penalised for not being able to use because of situations outwith their control like their health . ( its not like that person is choosing to remain housebound after all )

 

Is there a rule that states someone should have the mobility component stopped if they have been housebound for xxx years ?

 

mike

Edited by mikv
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've been housebound and told them about it ( DWP ) and they awarded me what they saw fit which mounts to just over £2640 a year for mobility / transport.

 

But obviously if I am housebound thats not going to be used , unless I improve and get out , so how exactly do you do decide when to award that someone or not if their in such precarious position to start with , and their health situation can change from day to day ?

 

I dont see why someone should be penalised for something that was awarded to them if its was someone else's decision like the DWP, or why they should be penalised for not being able to use because of situations outwith their control like their health . ( its not like that person is choosing to remain housebound after all )

 

Is there a rule that states someone should have the mobility component stopped if they have been housebound for xxx years ?

 

mike

Yes,it's called Change of circumstances !

 

If your mobility get worse/better,you needs more help at home or less you need to declare this to DLA office in Blackpool .

 

https://www.gov.uk/disability-benefits-helpline

 

DLA is not affect by savings/income....

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure the 23,500 figure is related to paying for care from social services.

 

That is something else too , I have unoffical carer of sorts in my folks who empty the bin , and do some cleaning once a week , cut my toe nails ( as i cant bend ), its not over 35 hrs ( more 4 -5 ) as required but its still invaluable as I like my privacy and they can pick up some things for me otherwise not unavailable i.e. treats like Chinese .

 

I do pay them for this , in addition to food they deliver for me , but its usually not that much ( the care ) as they never tend to ask any way.

 

Is there any way I can officially pay them for this through the DWP and what classifies as care if you have someone helping out with payments / finance and other things ?

 

mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,it's called Change of circumstances !

 

If your mobility get worse/better,you needs more help at home or less you need to declare it to DLA office in Blackpool https://www.gov.uk/disability-benefits-helpline

 

DLA is not affect by savings/income....

 

Well if they already knew I was housebound and I still am there is nothing to declare , and even if I did improve on what time scale is that measured ? i.e. what if i became re injured again in a week or even a day ?

( As is quite possible with my issues.)

 

mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they already knew I was housebound and I still am there is nothing to declare , and even if I did improve on what time scale is that measured ? i.e. what if i became re injured again in a week or even a day ?

( As is quite possible with my issues.)

 

mike

 

Is All of this to do with your previous thread !

 

ATOS denying home visit based on my GPs lack of evidence
http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?402596-ATOS-denying-home-visit-based-on-my-GPs-lack-of-evidence

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its connected, as I have declare savings to DWP , local council etc

 

mike

 

Yes , Im afraid so..

 

mike

Mike

 

So people can help and advise you on

CAG !

 

What benefits are you receiving to date and why are you now trying to claim Housing benefit !

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike

 

So people can help and advise you on

CAG !

 

What benefits are you receiving to date and why are you now trying to claim Housing benefit !

 

I'm not , but the the last time I claimed 4 yrs ago I was not housebound - so the benefits I would of otherwise being using - and not been able to currently use since then have accumulated outwith my typical savings .

 

mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not , but the the last time I claimed 4 yrs ago I was not housebound - so the benefits I would of otherwise being using - and not been able to currently use have accumulated outwith my typical savings.

 

mike

 

But in your first post you stated that you were filling out your HB. Are you currently claiming any benefits at all? If so, what are they?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But in your first post you stated that you were filling out your HB. Are you currently claiming any benefits at all? If so, what are they?

 

I'm not , but the the last time I claimed 4 yrs ago I was not housebound - so the benefits I would of otherwise being using - and not been able to currently use since then have accumulated outwith my typical savings .

 

mike

Again,Can I ask about All benefits you are receiving to date

 

Are you still receiving Incapacity benefit !

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?402596-ATOS-denying-home-visit-based-on-my-GPs-lack-of-evidence&p=4343705&viewfull=1#post4343705

 

I have not worked since 98 for my folks business and have a history of deterioration before i became housebound which the GP should be aware of too, afterall Ive on incapacity and DLA later since then , so its not like this is all sudden , my early symptoms of eds / hms go back to when I was 16 and in fact even before then when they were first identified at age 4 ( something I found out myself by requesting my history ) as I was never told / nor given follow up assessments at the time.

 

Communication is a problem for me if i cant talk without problems , much less type easily - if at all - what do they expect me to do ?

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:mikv:

 

£23,250 is the upper savings limit for help with care fees for residential accommodation. Nothing to do with housing benefit, for which the upper savings limit is £16,000. Should you want to spend some of your savings on medical treatment, and then claim an income related benefit, decision makers decide on a case by case basis whether the spend is reasonable in the circumstances. Although you're unlikely to get a definitive answer, your local authority may offer some guidance as to what they'd consider reasonable.

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:mikv:

 

£23,250 is the upper savings limit for help with care fees for residential accommodation. Nothing to do with housing benefit, for which the upper savings limit is £16,000. Should you want to spend some of your savings on medical treatment, and then claim an income related benefit, decision makers decide on a case by case basis whether the spend is reasonable in the circumstances. Although you're unlikely to get a definitive answer, your local authority may offer some guidance as to what they'd consider reasonable.

 

Margaret.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?402596-ATOS-denying-home-visit-based-on-my-GPs-lack-of-evidence&p=4347308&viewfull=1#post4347308

 

BTW is there any way to prove I've not been to my bank or made a cash withdrawl without showing " THEM " my statements ?
Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Please don't be tempted to attempt to hide the money somehow - that could be seen as fraud.

If the OP spends his money with sole purpose of obtaining benefits, it's not fraud, the spent capital will be treated as notional capital. He can't hide the money now, it's all in traceable savings.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the OP spends his money with sole purpose of obtaining benefits, it's not fraud, the spent capital will be treated as notional capital. He can't hide the money now, it's all in traceable savings.

 

Agreed, but your second point was the one I was trying to make. OP asked if he could "transfer" the money. Spending it would not be fraud, as you say, but transferring it to other accounts or people most certainly would be.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/236960/hbgm-bw1-assessment-of-capital.pdf

 

 

Notional capital

 

 

W1.680 A person may be treated as possessing a capital asset even though they do not actually have

that capital asset. Such assets are called notional capital. Examples of these are

HB Reg 49; CTB Reg 39

• a trust fund, see Trust funds earlier in this chapter

the deliberate disposal of capital for the purpose of claiming or getting an increase in the

amount of benefit. In these cases authorities can treat the claimant as still having the capital,

see Deprivation of capital later in this chapter

• in certain cases, payments of capital to third parties, see BW2 Payments to, or in respect of,

a third party later in this part

 

.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/213/part/6/crossheading/capital/made

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...