Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds TSB loan and Aktiv Kapital (Disputed balance enquiry)


moneyworries
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3847 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

proves there is something WRONG with the debt then

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha maybe...this is going to make me sound realky stupid now but if AK have to send a copy of any/all information they have which relates to me, should this not include things like loan paperwork etc? I did CCA them as well but haven't heard back

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no compulsion to include a copy of the CCA within an sar.

 

if they've failed the 21+2 days CCA timeline

 

time to send the failure to comply letter

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think someone has been confusing things here.

A CCA request (£1 fee) is for credit agreement plus statement nothing else

A SAR (Fee £10) is for all the PERSONAL information a company holds on you, but there is no obligation for the agreement to be supplied with this.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent both just to be sure as I thought that this was the case. I just find it to be a bit of a paradox given that credit agreements would count as personal information in just about every other context. Idle musing that's all :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It happened because the Regulated Consumer Credit Agreement is a document that a copy of which MUST be given to you at the inception of the agreement.

 

The provisions for obtaining a further copy of a CCA are laid down in CCA 1974 specifically, but are not mentioned in DPA 1998.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone

To date, I have heard nothing from Lloyds re the SAR request. AK have acknowledged my CCA request with what seems to be a standard letter saying that they will endeavour to respond within the prescribed timescales but that they need to obtain documents from the original creditor. They have explained that my account is on hold....

Link to post
Share on other sites

they still only have 12+2 WORKING days

 

once that has passed

 

stop any payments

and send the failure to comply letter

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not with an enforceable cca they haven't

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt is sold in bulk portfolio lots, with little data other, than that you will see on a CRA file, the debtors name/address/contact details/ the name of the original creditor/ and the amount owing.

 

There is no paperwork provided.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello again

AK have replied to my CCA request.

 

They've provided a stack of screenprints which show payments made from December 2004-Nov 2009.

 

The original reason I raised this thread was because I believed that the balance AK were demanding was incorrect

 

I 'm not sure what to do now as the last payment on the system was 2009

I don't know what balance my repayments were at when Lloyds sold the debt which doesn't solve the original point.

 

Llotds still haven't responded to my SAR.

 

AK's letter is not aggressive but requests a payment prposal within 14 days.

 

Any advice is as always appreciated :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago did you send the SAR time scale is 40 calendar days from the date the creditor receives the request.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I've started a new thread to avoid confusion! There is a link to the old one below.

 

I posted previously about a Lloyds TSB debt which has been sold to Aktiv Kapital.

 

 

When I received AK's Notice of Assignment I sent a CCA and SAR request to them as well as an SAR request to Lloyds TSB.

My reason for doing so was that prior to Lloyds selling the debt to AK,

I was in the process of requesting a reclaim for substantial bank charges from LTSB dating back throughout the loan.

 

 

Lloyds had already agreed a PPI refund (PPI was probably responsible for some of the bank charges!)

but had stayed all decisions re penalty charges until the result of the recent court case

as a result of which I re-opened my request for a refund of charges.

In the meantime however, they have sold on the debt.

 

Lloyds have not yet responded to my SAR but still have 3 days remaining.

 

AK responded to my SAR simply with a screenprint of my details as a new "customer" and a scanned copy of the original NOA

 

AK's response to my CCA request was a letter to explain that they were requesting details from LTSB

which was then followed by a payment history for the loan in the form of a series of statements dated from 2004-2009.

They have explained that they believe their obligations in proving the existence of the loan satisfied

and now want a repayment proposal within 7 days.

 

I have been using Payplan as part of a DMP so I am clearly not trying to deny that my loan exists,

but I believe that LTSB should not have sold this debt on whilst it was in dispute

and therefore the balance which AK believe to be owed is (in theory) incorrect as it contains various penalty charges etc.

 

I genuinely believe that LTSB would have had to refund my charges if my enquiries had not been interrupted by the sale of the deb

t hence my reason for disputing the balance of the loan with AK.

They of course remain steadfast as they have an NOA with the balance figure.

 

Payplan have been no help and neither have CAB. Should I be paying Aktiv Kapital anything? Here's a link to my previous thread if it's needed. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?396170-Dodgy-Notice-of-Assignment&p=4353761#post4353761

 

All advice is as always gratefully received :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This raises the question of whether a fixed debt amount or an account has been sold

 

I think that to sell a fixed amount of debt, the bank has to create some sort of financial instrument to sell

 

That only leaves them having sold an account. You should ask AK if they are now responsible for the PPI reclaim and refund of charges incorrectly applied as well as liability for any future legal action that you might take

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...