Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hitler v parking prankster


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3825 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Why is the Kirkbyinfurnesslad still posting on here, a website that he publicly discredited over on mse.

 

There has been some bad mouthing over on that site between him, me, and esmerobbo.....Why ? because they slag me off for thrashing roxburghe and wanting to give good advice to newbies....

A good thread on there is PCN NW Ltd taking me to court........You may wish to draw your own conclusions from the ladd who claims to have been at over 35 court cases up and down the country as a litigant's friend with wins and losses (Must be a samaritan) but cannot produce any evidence whatsoever except to say "Ill give you the case number, go buy the transcript"

 

:ban:

Link to post
Share on other sites

have seen said person on said forum being very rude particularly to newbies.also seen them being accused of spying(as seen on here too) also seen them slag off this site .they seem to think highly of them over on the other site jump to his defence should anyone complain about the attitude or question their integrity. bit of a clique going on there from what I can see. I may be wildly off the mark but it is just my humble opinion but one that it seems is shared by others :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

have seen said person on said forum being very rude particularly to newbies.also seen them being accused of spying(as seen on here too) also seen them slag off this site .they seem to think highly of them over on the other site jump to his defence should anyone complain about the attitude or question their integrity. bit of a clique going on there from what I can see. I may be wildly off the mark but it is just my humble opinion but one that it seems is shared by others :)

 

And which one do you work for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And which one do you work for?

Ha ha ye very funny i posted on here for help with equality act not professing to give advice or anything :) i was just saying i visited the other site and recognised the name from posts i have seen. I wouldnt have a clue where to start with advice re any 'ticket' or anything connected.quite laughable actually thought of me working for anyone connected with the 'industry'.i will leave the advice to those that know what they're on about. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is the Kirkbyinfurnesslad still posting on here, a website that he publicly discredited over on mse.

 

There has been some bad mouthing over on that site between him, me, and esmerobbo....

 

:ban:

 

If you call questioning your obsession with roxburghe/Sobell/GBP bad mouthing you then so be it!

 

I suggest you do a bit of research as to what side I am on before you accuse me of being a Roxburghe spy again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you call questioning your obsession with roxburghe/Sobell/GBP bad mouthing you then so be it!

 

I suggest you do a bit of research as to what side I am on before you accuse me of being a Roxburghe spy again.

 

I have done and so far neither you or your side kick can produce any evidence of the claims you both make.....It is laughable,

and all you can do is to somehow make out what I advise as being incorrect........And as for Roxburghe, it is not a fixation, it is called "justice" especially in the face of thousands of new claims and trolls posting all sorts

 

Quite frankly we are not impressed by the same clique all jumping on my back whenever I type a word (And you all know who you are !!!!!)

 

Let me refresh your memory on a bit of advise given by your buddy Quote "You must pay PE £60 otherwise it will go to court".....

 

And in the face of County Court papers, the best advise you and your side kicks can give is to email the BPA and complain (While the 14 day response time elapses)

 

Not very helpful really is it...........even better when the persons popla appeal was upheld.....

 

Then he states he will give me a case number and I can go buy his transcript.....Mr Ben there !!!!!!!!

 

Anyone who has ever bought a transcript will know you need the name of both the Claimant & Defendant, The Court & Court Address, Name of Judge, Date & time of hearing......

 

I wonder where he is today !!!!!!!! :lol::lol:

Edited by Scouse Magic
Link to post
Share on other sites

I give up, if you are going to spout garbage make sure its correct garbage.

 

Please dont quote what I have said if you cant back it up. Show me where I said anything you have stated I said.

 

What claims have I made?

 

Also who is "my buddy"? Apart from my wife I don't have a buddy, however if you mean defending someone who is being wrongly accused becoming my buddy then maybe I have!

 

So your advice to new posters regarding these charges is what exactly?

 

Ignore them?

 

Like these 1143 people did and received claims in a 3 month period?

 

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/parking_cases_brought_by_parking

 

Those days are past you have to be proactive now.

 

I have been here since 2007 arguing the case against PPC's can you show me one post I have made to support them?

 

Oh and the BAN emoticon can you tell me who has been banned from certain forums in the past. Let me see its not me is it?

Edited by esmerobbo
Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no purpose to this thread, so it is being closed.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3825 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...