Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CSA - an unusual question?


IanB1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3833 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

After 14 years paying a privately agreed amount for my daughter, my ex is now wanting double the amount and threatening to go to the CSA if I don't pay up.

The unusual bit is that I didn't see my daughter for the first 13 years of her life and have recently found out that she didn't have custody of our daughter for 6 of those years (the ex was/is an alcoholic and drug user when she lost custody). Because I didn't know this, I paid her all those years.

I wouldn't mind paying a bit more if I thought the money would be spent on my daughter but I don't believe it would be and I really cant afford what the CSA calculator says I should pay.

Could I use the fact that she had 6 years worth of maintenance off me as leverage to stop her bleeding me dry?

Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

welcome ian

why didn't you see her?

lost custody to who?

either way, how can it be sure if money is actually spent on the child?

best bet imo would be see a family solicitor if poss custody/visitation issues can't be resolved?

but, hang on for any further input:)

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ford,

It was a very messy break up before my daughter was born and she moved 200 miles away and wouldn't tell me exactly where. The only contact I had was the occasional call if she changed her bank details or wanted more money.

I see my daughter a bit now (not a lot because of the distance) but talk on phone/text.

She lost custody to her ex who was/is my daughters "dad" who is a very nice bloke and looked after her while her mum was doing all sorts of things that meant she couldn't look after our daughter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

did you not go for custody?

anyway, am not really familiar with csa issues etc but see there is the so called 'family based arrangement' as an alternative to csa. also, found this site which may help in the meantime? http://www.cmoptions.org/ check out the site fully.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

What a bugger !!!!!!

 

You've checked the calculater, and don't like what you see

So all you can do is make an offer, to her

bear in mind, she's probably seen the calculater aswell.

 

As for the previous payments, when she didn't have custody

If you have no written agreement, a visit to a brief, is in order

to ascertain if she's taken money from you, under false pretences

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...