Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • One of the things that we will need to discover through a statutory subject access request is how they verified the identity of this mystery person. Presumably that person couldn't actually give any ID so does that mean that the inspectors simply took her word for it? It will be useful to know the answers to these questions because all of these companies have duties to process your personal data accurately. If they failed to do that then they could be liable to you for the distress caused as well as any other damage. I'm just trying to envisage a scenario where a ticket inspector stops a young woman who then says that she's been travelling without a ticket. The inspector asks her her name and address and she gives the false name and address. The inspector then asks her to verify this by identification. The woman then says that she is not carrying anything with her. What happens at that point? How does it work? Does the inspector then have to take your word for it and warn her that she will be contacted with a possible sanction? If that's as far as it goes, then it seems a bit ridiculous to me that you stop somebody for travelling without a ticket – evident dishonesty. Then they give the controller their name and address which can't be verified and so the controller has to accept that and on that basis a procedure is started against the named person on the basis that the contact details which were given at the time must be true – even though that person has already demonstrated their dishonesty by travelling without a ticket. Or, are we going to find – if there is a statutory disclosure, that this person is travelling around with some documentation which identifies her as you, your husband or one of your two daughters? Which of course would be very much more serious. This is why we want a list of the rail companies – as much information as possible so that we can start forcing them to disclose information about how this all occurred. I will also be interested in sending an SAR to action fraud to see what they have done with your allegation which you made some time ago and about which you never heard anything further.
    • Evening all,   Right, just spoke to my SIL at length.....................   In response to Andy's question regarding T's & C's, that answer remains the same. The staff MORE cards and general public's cards both had the same T's & C's.   As for when he started the unofficial swiping practice, his best guesstimate is around September 2015.   Another development during our conversation, I asked him if he ever asked customers for their permission to swipe his card to claim their unclaimed points. He said he never actually asked but some regulars would forget their cards sometimes and tell him to take the points. Also, Stonegate would sometimes have promotions like half price food and drinks etc. However to claim the offer you had to have a MORE card. Again, if regulars had forgotten their MORE card he would use his for them to get the offers. I know this doesn't help his cause but in case its relevant I thought I'd offer it up.   I have impressed upon him the urgency of this now so if any more info is required just ask and I will get it.   Cheers
    • The company is called Robinson Way, it was a Barclaycard credit card.   I  moved about 12 months after Barclaycard stopped replying to my letters (re the charges, 2013) - so I did not tell them about my moving, but at the time of the original debt I was living back with my folks; so this most recent letter was sent to there, and my folks forwarded it to me - and likewise, if they had sent me anything in the interim it would have been forwarded to me.
    • I do agree with you.How sad I am right now . I wish I could go back. Mg7  
    • No way I will be doing this again. The way I’m feeling now. stealing doesn’t pay what I’m going through right now , it’s really hard. I wish I could have learned the first time. thank you for your help.   mg7  
  • Our picks

Halfords and AA [problem]


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1228 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have everything with the aa, roadside relay onward travel and breakdown.

 

Car is serviced regularly too.

 

The car is adapted to carry a ventilated child, thus the reason for the over the top cover.

 

We had to call them on Saturday as we traveled to pick our son up from the hospital, we also had another disabled child in the car. Response time 24 minutes. - Bike AA rider. Nice guy took 3 trips to the shop for parts to fix, Sadly not resolved. 1.5 hours now sat on main dual carriageway with no pavement.

 

Relay arranged and AA gave choice, pay up front with a VAT registered garage or use there repairer they would pay upto £500 per claim and i have to pay £35 excess.

 

There repairer was Halfords Auto Centre. Sorted car for 3 days and they took my car without me to garage.

 

Call back later from garage stating the car may have a blown number one cylinder after thaey ran diagnostics

 

Asked to repair with AA Cover. Intially AA forgot who i was and could not find my car....... mmmmmmmm

 

They they did, car repaired 6 days later.

 

Collected car and was given a bill to pay of 495.00.

 

This was in addition to the payment they claimed from AA.

 

Looked at invoice from Halfords and found the following:

 

Credit AA £465 (£500 - Excess £35.00)

 

The charge from Halfords Insurance Excess £35.00 + VAT (£42.00)

charged twice then as AA had also take the £35 excess from there payment........

 

I then look a little closer at the charges.

 

Diagnostic Charge £49.99 + VAT

 

Online you can submit a quote request giving your registration and garage you want to go too. I did my car that was repaired and named the garage conducting the repair

 

The cost would have been £39.99 Incl.

 

so that's another (VAT and Extra Charge)

 

Fluid top up - Antifreeze £35 - They would charge me £20 if i book it in (Dont forget the VAT)

 

In total I feel they have increased the charges between 15 - 30 %

 

Knowing the car is needed to carry the disabled child, i feel they have done me over knowing i need the car urgently as it is adapted to carry my son ventilator.

 

Complaint with AA - Nothing to do with them,

 

Can i speak to a manager - No was first answer, then i insist, but sadly they not answering there telephone.

 

Halfords had shut ............ Grrrrrrrrrr.:sad:

 

Is this a contract breach. HELP

SBFIDO

 

Accredited Member of the CIEH

 

No more will I be bullied or harassed.

 

When informed that the call is recorded for training and monitoring I always say I don't want it used for training. :razz:

 

I always ask for the ICO registration information - they often dont have it, shame i never discuss my personal data unless I know they comply with the DPA.

 

Finally I always record calls and state at the start of there call. Although I don't have too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the reply have sent the information to you.

 

Have already spoke to AA customer services seems although they towed car to the recommended repairers and now they deducted the excess it nothing to do with you......

 

Sadly - I feel as you sorted the garage, paid the garage it has lots to do with the AA. Why are AA members charged more than it would be if i took it in and why have we been double charged excess.

 

Feel there is some serious issues here. Is it because its a car adapted for a disabled person?

SBFIDO

 

Accredited Member of the CIEH

 

No more will I be bullied or harassed.

 

When informed that the call is recorded for training and monitoring I always say I don't want it used for training. :razz:

 

I always ask for the ICO registration information - they often dont have it, shame i never discuss my personal data unless I know they comply with the DPA.

 

Finally I always record calls and state at the start of there call. Although I don't have too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Update:

 

Halfords / AA now have admitted overcharging on this invoice. A refund on the three items I found has been offered.

 

As they do not seem to have checked the other 12 items on the invoice I am now checking these the overage over charge is around 20-40%

 

To add to the insult, my renewal from the AA has also landed, double the premium from last year.

 

The car was adapted for a disabled child and was urgently required back, it would appear that the preferential rates offered by Halfords for AA customers would in fact cost you a lot more.

 

Halfords have not even had the courtesy to offer an apology for the garage staff arguing with me.

 

The car is also not running well with fuel consumption up considerably. but will be back in two weeks for warranty check.

SBFIDO

 

Accredited Member of the CIEH

 

No more will I be bullied or harassed.

 

When informed that the call is recorded for training and monitoring I always say I don't want it used for training. :razz:

 

I always ask for the ICO registration information - they often dont have it, shame i never discuss my personal data unless I know they comply with the DPA.

 

Finally I always record calls and state at the start of there call. Although I don't have too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Halfords have today contacted in relation to the overcharging and mistakes on the invoice. A full refund of these and goodwill gesture has been accepted. This should have been resolved at the centre, however that is something that Halfords will address.

 

The AA have jumped my premium up and this has arrived. Not so good after the service received and unless they match last years premium will find they loose another member to the RAC. (some £100 cheaper too).

 

Enjoy all.

SBFIDO

 

Accredited Member of the CIEH

 

No more will I be bullied or harassed.

 

When informed that the call is recorded for training and monitoring I always say I don't want it used for training. :razz:

 

I always ask for the ICO registration information - they often dont have it, shame i never discuss my personal data unless I know they comply with the DPA.

 

Finally I always record calls and state at the start of there call. Although I don't have too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

You have had your car repaired using the AA Breakdown Repair Cover. You have options with this, however you must use a V.A.T registered garage. The AA's preferred ( but not exclusive ) repairer is Halford's. This is due to the nationwide warranty offered, and the fact that they will deal with all the admin with the AA so that when you go to collect your car, you only hand over £35 ( assuming the total invoice doesn't exceed £500 ). Some garages will want you to pay them in full before you take the car away. In this case you have to pay, then claim your money back from the AA. This may not be convenient if you don't have the money to pay. Also, if you live in a different part of the country and the repair fails when you get home, you have to get the car back to the repairing garage and the AA may not recover it again. I'm glad you got you money refunded, now speak to AA Member Relations and see if you can get your subscription reduced for next year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 years later...

sbfido

Occassionally check my accounts, many suppliers offer discounts to new customers, but not old. AA seem to have been consistently one of these. Really cheap for a year, then fees aren't mentioned too much. Always shop arround, if such practice is common we should all keep flipping. Fact is most of us are just too lazy to check. Four years with the AA, queried my subscription, instantly offered 50% reduction. Thought about it for a minute, checked RAC, so gave them 30 day cancellation notice. So if you are still with the AA.... There again do the RAC do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread is 4 years old. OP has not posted on the forum since October 2013.

  • Haha 1

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thread is 4 years old. OP has not posted on the forum since October 2013.

 

The AA actually stepped up and sorted the issue out including recovery and repairs needed.

 

Still watch my thread!

SBFIDO

 

Accredited Member of the CIEH

 

No more will I be bullied or harassed.

 

When informed that the call is recorded for training and monitoring I always say I don't want it used for training. :razz:

 

I always ask for the ICO registration information - they often dont have it, shame i never discuss my personal data unless I know they comply with the DPA.

 

Finally I always record calls and state at the start of there call. Although I don't have too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have to remember these organisation are profit oriantated these days, belonging to corporations not as we use to have members associations/clubs, gone are the real good old days of service within fee and no commisions by companies who have an agreement to repair etc etc with possible back handers, hence increase prices for insurance claims and repairs>????

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

even over 50s organisations etc are Insurance companies owned like SAGA etc etc, the theory went out of the window years ago as acting as agents not corporations, get car insurance quotes and there is no difference in prices much anyway.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...