Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faced with benefit fraud prosecutio


aldiboronti
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3868 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here's the situation.

 

I'm a 65 year old male living with my 56 year old partner.

 

We have a 17 year old daughter.

 

I've just had a letter to attend an interview under caution.

 

My partner inherited about £40,000 from her father in July.

We both lead practically separate lives now and although I live in the same house a

nd claim for us I don't have much to do with anybody,

keeping myself to myself and rarely going out.

(I have diabetes, heart problems and depression).

 

I didn't see much of the money although she did buy me a new laptop.

 

the money was frittered away in the space of about two months, mostly on debt and huge mortgage arrears.

There's nothing left now.

 

The thing is I stupidly didn't declare it and as the claim is in my name I should have done.

 

I kept meaning to but I'm terrible for putting things off.

 

I realized that the DWP must have known about the inheritance.

No attempt was made to hide the money.

I don't have a bank account but it sat openly in my partner's account while it lasted.

 

Now I have to attend this interview and I'm pretty scared.

 

How likely am I to face jail time?

 

It's the government statements on cracking down hard on fraud that terrify me.

I can't believe I've been so stupid.

I know a forum can't solve my problems but it helps a little just to talk about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you clarify which benefit you receive? Is it State Pension Credit?

 

It will be another case from the Pension Credit capital match scan I mentioned in another thread recently.

 

They will have copies of all the relevant bank statements & the combined overpayment should be at least £2000 because FIS only deal with cases that are potentially prosecutable nowadays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the situation.

 

I'm a 65 year old male living with my 56 year old partner.

 

We have a 17 year old daughter.

 

I've just had a letter to attend an interview under caution.

 

My partner inherited about £40,000 from her father in July.

We both lead practically separate lives now and although I live in the same house a

nd claim for us I don't have much to do with anybody,

keeping myself to myself and rarely going out.

(I have diabetes, heart problems and depression).

 

I didn't see much of the money although she did buy me a new laptop.

 

the money was frittered away in the space of about two months, mostly on debt and huge mortgage arrears.

There's nothing left now.

The thing is I stupidly didn't declare it and as the claim is in my name I should have done.

 

I kept meaning to but I'm terrible for putting things off.

 

I realized that the DWP must have known about the inheritance.

No attempt was made to hide the money.

I don't have a bank account but it sat openly in my partner's account while it lasted.

 

Now I have to attend this interview and I'm pretty scared.

 

How likely am I to face jail time?

 

It's the government statements on cracking down hard on fraud that terrify me.

I can't believe I've been so stupid.

I know a forum can't solve my problems but it helps a little just to talk about it.

The benefits concerned would be Pension Credit, although Council Tax and Child Tax Credits would be involved too I expect.

 

Surly you should know Exactly what benefits you and your partner where claiming,living in the same house together !

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, my first thought is that you're not likely to face jail time. I'm presuming the overpayment in question is not vast, and that your claim was not fraudulent from the outset (in other words, your partner received the money after you first claimed benefits).

 

Second thought is that it would be a good idea to seek some advice from a solicitor experienced in benefit matters. Even if you intend to admit the offence and show remorse, legal help is still useful.

 

From the point of view of SPC, you can calculate the overpayment like this: the first £10,000 of the money is ignored. After that, £1 per week is deducted from your entitlement for every £500 in savings. So for each week that the £40,000 was in the bank, you would work out:

 

  • First £10,000 ignored, leaving £30,000
  • £30,000 divided by £500 is £60.
  • So your benefit should have been reduced by £60 per week for all the time your partner had the money

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the replies. I have contacted a solicitor and she will see me on Tuesday and accompany me to the interview next Friday. Yes, everything was quite above board with the claim until my partner received the inheritance and I neglected to report it. I tend to neglect everything these days. I've checked the period concerned and it's a bit longer than I thought, about 4 months in all. Calculating by your guide above it looks to be about £1000 Pension Credit overpayment. Adding to that (as I'm sure they will) would be the Council Tax relief overpayment, the Child Tax Credits overpayment and Child Benefit. On the same reckoning that's probably an additional few hundred pounds. Maybe, overestimating for safety, a total of £2000 for the 4 months.

 

BTW will the DWP go after my partner too or will they rest content with my scalp?

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW will the DWP go after my partner too or will they rest content with my scalp?

 

Depends what you say to be frank - if you accept that you were aware of the inheritance and that you knew that it would have affected your joint claim then probably not. It is your claim and therefore your responsibility to notify any changes in circumstances.

 

If you try to say that you didn't know anything about the inheritance that your partner received then they will have no option but to speak to her - there are specific offences of knowingly allowing a person to claim incorrectly

Link to post
Share on other sites

a few points.

 

If council tax relief is passported by pension credit (if it is at your council), then if you still had even a little bit of pension credit after the deduction due to capital, then your council tax relief wouldn't be affected.

 

Paying mortgage arrears is a reasonable thing to do with savings, if you can show they were arrears, then from the date of payment of the arrears you shouldn't be counted as still being in possession of that part of the capital. But be aware that 'deprivation of capital' rules may have an effect on your ongoing benefit entitlement - this is where you can be treated as still having the money if the DWP think that it was 'got rid of' for the money in order to be able to continue claiming benefit. You can appeal a deprivation of capital decision, and ask that the 'diminishing capital rule' be applied (where the amount you would have had to spend to make up the gap in your pension credit is deducted from the capital).

 

If you don't mind me asking, how much was the mortgage arrears? Did you spend the money on anything 'essential', if so what did you spend it on and how much?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

About £7000 was spent on mortgage arrears and £4000 on other debts (utilities, etc). Ironically we learned recently that although DWP has, with our permission, been stopping £22 weekly from our benefit for over 18 months for gas arrears the gas company hasn't seen a penny of it! I don't know what's going on there.

 

As for the rest of the money my partner spent it very quickly. It might as well have been thrown away. A few examples: £3500 on a holiday for my partner, my daughter and two friends. Money and holiday lost because my partner didn't get her passport in time. Another attempt, this time £2000 on a week in the Caribbean. Money and holiday lost because my daughter didn't get back in time to get the taxi to the airport. (A third attempt for the two of them did work out, £2000 for that one.) My partner bought me a laptop, a new pair of boots and an easy chair. That's not a dig, it's all I wanted. Because of my illness I have little interest in anything now.

 

I'll be glad if I bear the brunt alone. My daughter (who has many issues) needs her mum far more than she needs me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, priority debts (mortgage and utilities) are a reasonable expense, so if they were paid as soon as you got the money, that amount should not be taken into account from then.

 

So that would get you down to approx. £40 a week that should have been deducted (if they accept the debts as essential to be paid) - do you receive more than that in pension credit? If so there should be no issues with your council tax reduction

 

regarding the interview under caution, be honest, be apologetic, explain your mental health issues that cause you difficulty dealing with things. If it's too difficult to explain, have a written statement prepared that can be read into evidence. There should be no effect on your partner, it's your claim, your responsibility as far as the DWP see it.

 

Given your circumstances and the amount involved, I doubt there would be a prosecution, maybe just a caution and/or a financial penalty.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...