Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

shop direct {very] REfuse to help me!!


bluespiderman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3853 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All.

We've had an on-going debt issue for about 6 months now due to a drop in income for my wife and I.

 

My wife has sorted out reduced payments with Barclaycard and Creation for 2 credit card accounts,

both have kindly accepted temporary reduced payments of £10 and £30 and all but frozen the interest.

 

The issue we have is with a third account which is storecard type account (Shop Direct) charging 39% interest.

 

We have from the start offered a £50 reduced payment but they just seem to ignore our requests.

 

Isent 2 letters (recorded) in March and April both asking for help with the usual threat

that if they don't help we will reduce the payment to £1.

 

I've also asked for all correspondence by letter to maintain an audit trail.

Nothing comes back, except endless bills adding almost £200 per month on now

as the debt was originally around £2k and has not grown well past £3k.

 

I thought I'd have a third and final attempt in August so

 

i sent another letter complaining about their lack of responses and threatening to report them to the FOS if they didn't respond,

i also included copies of all of the other letters sent and delivery receipts,

and even copies of the 2 temp agreements from the other 2 lenders,

and also a copy of the income/expenditure report we'd used for the other lenders.

 

I did get a reply back dated 27th August,

this time from NCO Europe Ltd stating that the matter was being investigated

and that we would receive a full and detailed response once the investigation is complete.

We've still not heard anything ...

 

I had also put the following in the last letter

 

"I also request that any penalty charges imposed since 28th February 2013,

when I first wrote to you asking for help, are removed immediately, along with any interest charges."

 

I know that the penalty charges are unlawful and i can strike these off the debt,

but am i within my rights to demand that the interest be removed as they failed to assist us for the last 6 months?

 

I'm worried that the debt will just grow and grow even if they accept the £50 payments.

 

Is the interest likely to be enforced ?

 

I've read a fair bit about the legal processes and I've seen that if it becomes a CCJ the interest

will be effectively frozen (there is nothing in the CA stating that interest will be added after judgment)

but is there any way to force the interest to be frozen whilst we try to pay the debt off ?

 

can i actually report them to the FOS or some similar authority who would assist me in freezing the interest

to allow a realistic way to pay the debt off ?

can we force a CCJ somehow ?

 

I'm waiting eagerly for the "results of their investigations"

but i fear that it's just another stalling tactic whilst they pile more interest onto the debt

whilst ignoring our requests for help...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good old shop direct. Get a formal complaint in and also complain to the oft. They are in breach of their credit licence.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

I think i have effectively already sent the formal complaint (wording below).

 

I forgot to mention we'd actually got a letter back from RMA Resolve

which suggested that an agreed reduced payment plan was already in place!

they'd never agreed to anything all i had done was dropped the payments to £1

 

So i should now report them to OFT ??? (rather than FOS as i's stated ... oops)

 

This was the full letter i sent:-

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

COMPLAINT

Client: Shop Direct Group (Very)

Account Number: xxxxxxx

Thank you for your letter dated 13th August 2013 which suggests that

“previously agreed reduced monthly terms” are in place on this account,

and that you would like to review these in accordance with the lending code.

 

I can confirm that contrary to all of the guidelines and codes issued by the relevant bodies and authorities

that govern you and the way you conduct yourselves, you (or Shop Direct Group/Very)

have failed to assist me in any way during a period of financial difficulty.

 

I am therefore confused as to why you would refer to a previous agreement relating to “reduced monthly terms”.

 

In fact, I have not received replies to any of my previous letters asking for your help

and attempting to agree on realistic reduced monthly terms.

 

As you are acting on this matter you should be in receipt of all correspondence relating to the account from your client.

 

However, this does not seem to be the case.

 

I would draw your attention to the enclosed copies of letters and proofs of receipt.

 

I first wrote a letter on 28th February 2013 stating that I was in financial difficulty

and not able to meet my normal monthly repayments. I offered to make a reduced monthly payment of £50 per month,

and requested that as a reciprocal goodwill gesture any penalty charges would be levied

and interest frozen on the account.

 

I wrote a second letter on 21st March 2013 stating again that I was in financial difficulties.

 

Again, I offered to make a reduced monthly payment of £50 per month which is all I can afford.

 

I specifically requested that Very write back to me within 14 days in order to maintain an accurate

written record of communications.

 

I did not receive a response to either of these letters.

 

As both of my letters were ignored and no assistance was given, and as detailed in both letters,

I had no alternative but to reduce my offer to £1 per calendar month for the rest of the life of the account,

as there is no realistic way for me to reduce the balance owing on the account.

 

I can confirm that in accordance with the lending code, both of my other main creditors,

Barclaycard and Creation, have been willing to accept payment plans of £30 and £10 respectively with interest rates virtually frozen.

 

I have enclosed copies of the agreements with these companies, and also a copy of my current

income and expenditure details.

 

I respectfully request that you re-consider my offer to make a reduced monthly payment of £50 per month,

and that as a reciprocal goodwill gesture you refrain from levying any penalty charges & freeze any interest on my account.

 

This will give me realistic way to reduce the balance owing on the account.

 

I also request that any penalty charges imposed since 28th February 2013,

when I first wrote to you asking for help, are removed immediately, along with any interest charges.

 

If you are not able to assist me, or chose not to reply to this letter,

I shall have no alternative but to continue to pay £1 per calendar month for the rest of the life of the account,

as your actions would do nothing to help me and there is no realistic way for me to reduce the balance owing on the account.

 

I have been advised to communicate with you in writing only,

in order that an accurate record of proceedings is maintained.

 

I am making every effort to resolve this situation with you.

 

If you fail to assist me again, or ignore this letter and chose not to respond in writing,

I will have no choice but to report the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service without further delay.

 

I look forward to receiving your written response within 14 days.

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets see what they respond with. Normally they say something about "you agreed to our terms, therefore you are legally liable". However they dont say that the majority of their t&c's are unfair and unenforceable in court or in the OFT eyes.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took HSBC to the FOS and complained about them adding interest to the account.

Was told that charging interest for 6 months prior to issuing a default was acceptable.

 

Hope you can get some of yours back but I wouldn't be too hopeful.

 

That's interesting

- we first had a default on Feb 16th or at least a letter titled

"Notice of Default Sums under the Consumer Credit Act 1974".

 

So this means that the FOS point of view is that if your in financial difficulty it's acceptable

for the company to continue to charge interest for 6 months after this point (i assume you meant after and not before?).

 

If that's correct than any interest from around 16th August should be unenforceable

if i were to have sufficient evidence to show that Shop Direct failed to assist ?

 

If that's correct that would be a huge relief as we do want to pay the debt back,

admittedly it will take some time, but whilst Shop Direct continue to add 40% annual interest

we haven't got a hope, at least if they froze the interest

(or if FOS or OFT forced them to) then we'd have light at the end of the tunnel.

 

I've still not had anything back from NCO Europe and it's now nearly a month since they wrote back stating

that they were investigating,

 

I'm tempted to go ahead with complaints to FOS and OFT now as Shop Direct

seem to be failing in many areas regardless of what (or even if) NCO Europe ever come back with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's my understanding that when a default is issued, interest and charges stop being added to the account.

HSBC acted "fairly" because they stopped adding interest and charges within 6 months of my last payment.

 

Will try and dig out the paperwork and scan exactly what was said.

Edited by Wooks001
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they keep adding on interest while youa r ein financial difficulty and they are ignoring your completely, then it is grounds for a formal complaint. If the FOS are being stubborn ( they seem to be skim reading a lot of claims at the lower stages to reduce the backlog they have), then go to the OFT/FCA.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also always send the Letter of Complaint to the CEO of the Debt Collection / Creditor, hold them accountable for your treatment.

 

The OFT will log your complaint, but won't intervene on individual cases. I like to send the Debt collector / creditor a copy of the letter the OFT send me.

 

Debt Collection Guidance - Office of Fair Trading

Link to post
Share on other sites

that was not a DN but a DSN.

default sums notice, just a letter saying they are going to charge you

 

what are NCO doing with this debt?

 

have SD [very ] sold it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that was not a DN but a DSN.

default sums notice, just a letter saying they are going to charge you

 

what are NCO doing with this debt?

 

have SD [very ] sold it?

 

dx

 

I'm not entirely sure! i sent the letter of complaint to RMA Resolve as SD had written to us to say that RMA were acting, but nothing has been said about NCO until they replied to the letter to RMA so they seem to have sold it on (again?) without confirming to us

Link to post
Share on other sites

check your cra file then

 

see below

 

if remember rightly PMA are NCO anyhow

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...