Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @BearLake1   I have a similar PCN from the same place. I've just received 'Letter Before Claim' today. I wonder if you are able to share your reply to CVS? Did you send your reply by email or mail?   Thanks!
    • Will this work?   I disupte this debt because, Firstly i only ever used my phone via wifi, there was never a notification regarding usage and data. The rules regarding roaming usage has changed,  the default was illegal and was disputed. This matter is between O2 and myself.   The debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation.
    • Hi all   Wow, do I have a situation to contend with now! I shall include as many important facts as needed.   I have received a solicitors letter today, by instruction of MY PARENTS claiming they are beneficially entitled to a property I purchased in 1999.   This property belonged to my Grandad who sadly passed away in 1993. He had hand written a will, not witnessed by anyone, leaving the property to my Mother and not his Son. Of course my Mothers Brother wasn’t happy with this and contested it which ended up in court. This dragged on for a long time, it could have been years? Until it was decided the house be sold and money divided equally. From memory I think the legal feels were around £30k ish.   At this time my parents didn’t have jobs and I was able to obtain a mortgage in 1999 and after going on the market purchased the house for £50k as it needed a lot of work. At the time I was very close to my parents and it felt a good thing to keep the house in the family circle as such (like cars sometimes) but was obviously in my name as the owner. I paid the mortgage and utilities on it and it sat empty for ten years whilst deciding what to do, more my Mother not wanting anyone to touch it and change memories.   The council kept writing to me until eventually said it would be a forced sale if nothing done with it. I then obtained additional borrowing to fund the complete renovation and then rented it out with the idea if it reducing the mortgage. Around the same time and during the crash I manged to buy another house needing work, by using equity on first as a deposit and a mortgage on the new house.   My parents would always refer to the 1999 as my house although this felt awkward. A few years along the way (2010/1/2) my Dad purchased their council house at a reduced rate.   I moved out of my parents home in 2014 and into the second house once it was all modernised, which since the relationship with parents has just deteriorated a lot. Arguing about lots and them saying I need to ‘sign the house back over to them’ on more than one occasion.   To fast forward, the tenants moved out of the property recently and my parents found because as creepy as it sounds, I think they used to drive by or watch them. The signing back over has been demanded recently to which I said was ridiculous etc…   Today I get this letter with 29 paragraphs and crux of which being to transfer to property, with vacant possession and mortgage free, to them and in addition any surplus rent from the previous ten years!   The letter is full of lies my parents have told the solicitor such as:   I lived with them rent free in lieu of paying the mortgage They paid all the utility bills and council tax They paid for and carried out most of the work back on the house in between purchase and 2008 when renovated My Father dealt with the letting agents recently and I ‘merely’ signed the tenancy agreement   There was a time, as my parents have always been high maintenance, I had written something for my Mum to say although I own the house, morally it belongs to her as probably thought it would help the relationship. A copy of this has been included, although I think looks slightly different to what I had printed and also says…about asking their permission to sell it and they could move in if they ever wanted, I really do not recall saying that! This piece of paper I refer to has no date or signature.   My goodness, this has completely knocked me for six. Its like history repeating itself!   I have checked with Eon, Council tax etc… so far and all have been in my name and paid for by me.   The letter also says ‘the facts of this case are familiar to you and you ought not to require any further enquiry’ which almost is like the solicitor knows this is all hearsay/BS and no proof? Also that I should respond to the claim within 28 days. The letter was also not recorded in case it makes a difference.   Another paragraph says advises my parents 'have a strong claim that I am holding the property on trust for them absolutely by way of constrictive trust and/or proprietary estoppel' I have no idea what this means!   One thing I should point out, I used to be very much in my parents bubble, asking them for advice, wanting their approval, very much lacking confidence in awareness of my own abilities. It is since I have started thinking for myself they don't have the hold on me their behavior  have become worse.   What are your thoughts please? I really have no idea what to think!   Many thanks in advance as always   E!
    • So I got a phone call on Saturday on my private mobile phone. This call was from Moriarty law ...I had sent my PAP docs back with no e mail address or phone number ...they said they had used a tracing company to find my details ....I have since called them and put in a complaint that they have breached GDPR regs ..they have now suspended any action pending a full investigation. The agent who called me was not very bright to say the least ..he wanted me to make an offer of payment even though as I told him it was only an allegation that I owed the money as ADCB had not sent the original paperwork back..... he then told me that they could take me to court even if I had not got a copy of my signed credit agreement ....I basically told him to jog on ...I'll let you all know the outcome of Moriartys GDPR breach investigation .
    • or should I sent a copy of Ericsbrother's template  ?    Please help!     Unfortunately for you, I was not born yesterday so I will not be paying the demand as there is no liability in this matter because the signage is prohibitive and not an offer of a contract so none has been breached and anyway the POFA limits any charge to the specified sum so your demand for £160.00 is nonsense. As VCS (Vehicle Control Services Ltd) has been spanked at court on this very same thing several times before I suggest that you discontinue this foolishness. Should VCS decide to continue then I shall be asking for a full costs recovery order for unreasonable behaviour and then seek damages for the breach of the DPA/ GDPR as per VCS V Philip, Liverpool CC Dec 2016. Even Will and John, the parking world’s worst solicitors seem to have got fed up with Simple Simon’s stupidity and greed and presumably that it why you are wasting your ink on his behalf.
  • Our picks

rds60h

National Service Bill

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1480 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Ok, do it. Now we have six million service personnel, what are they all going to do? we will have the shiniest tanks, ships and warplanes in the whole world.

 

That is all they can be, cleaners as we have no aircraft nor ships for them to serve on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps if time was taken to read the Bill then some of the remarks made would not have been made. The Bill states that service is for 1 year, not the periods of time that would "give up a good part of their youth" there is no mention in the Bill of "Military Service" the nearest the Bill comes to mention anything like Military Service is in Section 2 Part 5 that states an option to "work connected with the National Health Service, the emergency services or the Armed Forces".

A lot of arguements against are based on people's idea's of 1950's National Service, which is why a few have stated about "have those suggesting it ever done or would want to do National Service" There is no comparison !!

There are also cries of "a waste of money" is it not also a "waste of money" and indeed of the potential of those youths to pay them Benefits to do nothing ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So forced enlistment for 1 year purely to bodge the numbers of the workforce and also removing the freedom on young people under penalty of imprisonment or fines.

 

And you dont see anything wrong with that?


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rds60h is desperately trying to justify the so called "BILL" which looks like it has been pasted together by someone in junior school as it has not been thought through and implications plus circumstances taken into consideration. It is a piece of paper that someone has headed "Bill" in an effort to make it look official. It won't even be presented to the house of commons as it will be laughed out the house!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These days the UK cannot afford a disaffected conscripted military, type of ill thought out proposal has been cropping up since compulsory national service was scrapped.

 

The military cannot/must not be used or be seen to be used as some kind of punishment/retraining establishment for petty offenders and trouble makers or a as an easy option for the Government to lower the unemployment figures.

 

Although the Military has an enviable reputation for corrective training returning the vast majority of service people sent to the MCTC in Colchester to a full active career with their unit, this cannot be done on a 'national' scale.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Although the Military has an enviable reputation for corrective training returning the vast majority of service people sent to the MCTC in Colchester to a full active career with their unit, this cannot be done on a 'national' scale.

 

Not enough galvanised dustbins to polish :)

Edited by Conniff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More "Military" remarks being made by those who have obviously not read the Bill (and it is a Bill because it has been presented to Parliament and it has had its first reading).

There also seems to be a trail of thought of "disgusting enforced labour" firstly as the Bill states there will be learning and coaching as well as work. Secondly, does it follow that those who are opposed to this "disgusting forced labour" are happy for those youngsters on benefits to sit about and fester and lose all self respect and accept life on the dole as the norm ? I don't think that is true, but what is their suggestion to improve that situation....................surely some action must be better than inaction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'military remarks' are from experience, todays military cannot be used for a 'social experiment' getting young adults off JSA or whatever.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
More "Military" remarks being made by those who have obviously not read the Bill (and it is a Bill because it has been presented to Parliament and it has had its first reading).

There also seems to be a trail of thought of "disgusting enforced labour" firstly as the Bill states there will be learning and coaching as well as work. Secondly, does it follow that those who are opposed to this "disgusting forced labour" are happy for those youngsters on benefits to sit about and fester and lose all self respect and accept life on the dole as the norm ? I don't think that is true, but what is their suggestion to improve that situation....................surely some action must be better than inaction.

 

You seem to like contradicting yourself and ignoring everyone elses discussions and arguments against it.

 

National Service was removed for a reason. The conservatives want to bring it back simply to fudge the employment statistics and to lower the juvenile incarceration numbers. It really is as simple as that.

 

As already said, the military cannot support a national service scheme. The personell doesnt exist, nor does the money. Think about it, you have millions of people of NS age who would be forced to sign up. Ho is going to pay them? Train them? Where would they live? What would they do?


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on rds60h, this is joke right?

 

Everyone between 18 and 26.

 

Lets have a look at this Stupid, not thought through bill:

 

First off where are they going to be housed?

Who is going to be their instructors?

 

There is 7.5 million people in the UK between the ages of 18 and 26, so lets do some costings shall we.

 

Lets say 7 million.

 

(They are to be paid the national 'adult' minimum wage £6.31)

 

 

£6.31 * 7 million = £44,170,000 per hour * 40 hours = £1,766,800,000 per week + all the ancilliary staff and equipment that goes with it so it's safe to double that.

 

Where is the government going to get that sort of money?

 

There is nothing about the military in those figures.

 

Now we come to the court costs of those that refuse and so 'commit an offence' and then there all these new 'criminals' on the street not able to get work as no employer wants to employ a criminal.

 

Now comes the jokes

 

 

(1) Participants in national service shall be paid the national adult minimum wage

during their year of service with accommodation and travel funded by the

Secretary of State.

 

(2) Regulations shall provide that a person who has successfully completed their

year of national service shall be presented with a national service certificate

which shall entitle them to a lifetime income tax rate personal allowance 10 per

cent above the personal allowance that would otherwise apply.

Edited by Conniff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fully agreed there conniff. it is definitely ill thought out and is very obviously a ploy to fudge the employment numbers. The sad thing is, that people, like rds60h are in full support of this bill. it's as if they are such a devout conservative supporter, they think they will commit a mortal sin if they disagree with anything the party throws out.

 

Then theres the part where he states it will get the troublemakers off the streets. First, there are laws in ths country and a justice system to sort that out. Plus you really think throwing a troublemaker into the military and handing him access to all manner of equipment will make him good? If anything it will feed his attitude.

 

This country and its residents is NOTHING like it was back in the 60's and previous. The government and the elders of society really need to sit up and realise that.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fully agreed there conniff. it is definitely ill thought out and is very obviously a ploy to fudge the employment numbers. The sad thing is, that people, like rds60h are in full support of this bill. it's as if they are such a devout conservative supporter, they think they will commit a mortal sin if they disagree with anything the party throws out.

 

Then theres the part where he states it will get the troublemakers off the streets. First, there are laws in ths country and a justice system to sort that out. Plus you really think throwing a troublemaker into the military and handing him access to all manner of equipment will make him good? If anything it will feed his attitude.

 

This country and its residents is NOTHING like it was back in the 60's and previous. The government and the elders of society really need to sit up and realise that.

If the Executive wish to implement any law, they will do it.... the Executive, controlling the Payroll Vote within the House of Commons and House of Lords, and will do whatever they are told. A recent example was the Retrospective Legislation dealing with aftermath of the Cait Reilly Judgement. If someone on the Payroll Vote does not do as they are told, such as a PPS, then they will soon be replaced.

 

Unfortunately, the coercive power of patronage, enabling MP's to become part of the Payroll Vote, where they may be promised an accelerator on the Greasy Pole, introduces a considerable motivator - and the General Government and Elders in Society may be powerless to influence the decisions made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will get repealed once they realise youngsters today are not going to give up their freedom, simply so the likes of cameron and clegg can look good in europe.

 

Politicians need to realise, that the days of blind obedience are over.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What no one is taking into consideration is the cost to implement it and monitor it never mind the running costs. Youngsters will duck and dive to avoid NS which means that you will need MPs to scour the land for them. What is to stop them working elsewhere in the EU between ages 16 - 26? The MP who thought this up must be the laughing stock of commons as most people think quite correctly that he is an idiot! Some lame brain even started an e-petition for this and has been posting invites on loads of forums. I split my sides laughing when I read their begging post!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fully agreed there conniff. it is definitely ill thought out and is very obviously a ploy to fudge the employment numbers. The sad thing is, that people, like rds60h are in full support of this bill. it's as if they are such a devout conservative supporter, they think they will commit a mortal sin if they disagree with anything the party throws out.

 

Then theres the part where he states it will get the troublemakers off the streets. First, there are laws in ths country and a justice system to sort that out. Plus you really think throwing a troublemaker into the military and handing him access to all manner of equipment will make him good? If anything it will feed his attitude.

 

This country and its residents is NOTHING like it was back in the 60's and previous. The government and the elders of society really need to sit up and realise that.

 

Just to burst your idiotic illusions, I am not a Tory nor have I ever voted Tory in my Life !!

I have in the past been a Union activist and I vehemently opposed almost everything Maggie Thatcher stood for and firmly blame the Iron Lady for many of the ills of todays society.

By your remarks, as I already stated about others, you have not fully read the Bill so how can you blindly agree with someone who disagrees if you do not have knowledge of the facts of a subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Come on rds60h, this is joke right?

 

Everyone between 18 and 26.

 

Lets have a look at this Stupid, not thought through bill:

 

First off where are they going to be housed?

Who is going to be their instructors?

 

There is 7.5 million people in the UK between the ages of 18 and 26, so lets do some costings shall we.

 

Lets say 7 million.

 

(They are to be paid the national 'adult' minimum wage £6.31)

 

 

£6.31 * 7 million = £44,170,000 per hour * 40 hours = £1,766,800,000 per week + all the ancilliary staff and equipment that goes with it so it's safe to double that.

 

Where is the government going to get that sort of money?

 

There is nothing about the military in those figures.

 

Now we come to the court costs of those that refuse and so 'commit an offence' and then there all these new 'criminals' on the street not able to get work as no employer wants to employ a criminal.

 

Now comes the jokes

 

 

(1) Participants in national service shall be paid the national adult minimum wage

during their year of service with accommodation and travel funded by the

Secretary of State.

 

(2) Regulations shall provide that a person who has successfully completed their

year of national service shall be presented with a national service certificate

which shall entitle them to a lifetime income tax rate personal allowance 10 per

cent above the personal allowance that would otherwise apply.

 

Where is the government going to get that sort of money?

 

What about the same place they managed to get the £995 Billion..........YES £995 Billion !! to support the Banks and which the continue to fund ?

Or how about reducing the £11.3 Billion we annually give in Aid...........much of which is to countries that do not require Aid and is actually used to grease palms for foreign trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This may be of use providing the armed forces are exempted from involvement!


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where is the government going to get that sort of money?

 

What about the same place they managed to get the £995 Billion..........YES £995 Billion !! to support the Banks and which the continue to fund ?

Or how about reducing the £11.3 Billion we annually give in Aid...........much of which is to countries that do not require Aid and is actually used to grease palms for foreign trade.

 

We can forget the billions to the Banks, that was just a temporary bailout and they took shares as collateral and will be selling those shares at a time where they will make a profit on them.

 

Overseas aid I fully agree with you. Africa hasn't changed in the past million years despite billions and billions being pumped into them by us, more that the rest of the world put together, and as for India, that is the worse of a real bad lot. We are giving them millions and they are sending spaceships to mars. Giving aid to a country that is probably richer than we are really is something we should demand our Government stops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This government just does what the bush administration dif. You don't have the money? Simple answer - Create it out of thin air. Then blame other governments for causing the country to fall into debt. Repeat it often enough and people will begin to believe it.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Africa hasn't changed in the past million years despite billions and billions being pumped into them by us

 

Thats due to Africa's government and out government being in bed with them due to arms trade etc etc. Remove specific african governments and you can turn the country around in a decade or so. Keep the current officials in power, and we get more money from them from arm sales, and their country goes to hell.


Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ eclecticzebra

 

This thread is 2 years old and you wouldn't be able to sign the petition if you wanted to as it is Archived and the Deadline was 16th Sept 2014

 

Why are you posting in old threads?


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...