Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mkdp/hsbc - first direct account [merged card/OD - managed loan]


Shawn0109
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3526 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To be fair there,

in all honesty I sent a CCA first and it was over 13-14 months later they came back the DCA

and said oh wait it's a bank account not a credit account,

 

now I then went to HSBC/First Direct and sent them an SAR now tell me..

 

... They can get statements for an old credit card from 2002 that was fully paid off and closed....

 

.. But they can't get statements for an alleged Bank Account that allegedly defaulted in 2004.....

 

........ Strange isn't it.........

 

.... But yeah the payments that I made for SAR and CCA requests I have evidence for as I have kept all them letters from that time period

 

so I am still going with the Statue Barred route, as payment for either a CCA or an SAR can not reflect or be placed on to a disputed account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yep!!

oh and stay off the phone?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this that hsbc debt that IND got a CCJ on years ago?

 

it was SBd then!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Been a long time since I last was on here, my previous thread has been closed don't know why?????:|

 

Anyways here is my issue that is currently stressing me out as this company is not taking "No" for an answer and are now being very aggressive.....

 

This alleged debt has been with a number of different collection agencies

every time I send them the same old £1.00 postal order to get a copy of the alleged Credit Agreement

every time with them saying "Oh we don't have it, go and get it from the original creditor".

 

Now this lot started back in beginning of 2012

again I sent a £1.00 postal order and every month they came back saying "Oh we are still waiting for HSBClink3.gif to provide us with it".

Then all of a sudden when I advised them that they are in default of my request by over a year

they then say "Oh it's not a Credit Agreement but a Bank Account".

 

Erm ok I don't believe you because I do remember I had some form of credit because with the last lot of collection agencies in 2010

the balance is for the same amount with a different HSBC/First Direct Account Number...... Very interesting.

 

when I made the £1.00 postal order payment to the previous collection agency for a copy of the alleged agreement

they told me they "Didn't have it" so what did they do?

Make it look like I made a payment to the account instead,

good job I kept all the letters from that long ago to prove what the £1.00 was for.

 

MKDP are saying it's a "Bank Account" now and not a "Credit Agreement" which I know for a fact what it is,

but I am standing my ground here and have not admitted anything to them,

 

I sent an SARlink3.gif request posted signed for on delivery with a £10 postal order got a reply back yesterday what have they sent?

 

Screen shots of payments made to the alleged account,

no statements from the original creditor,

no explanation as to how the debt came about

as on the screen shots they sent over show a balance of £0.00 "LOL"

and no Deed Of Assignment

 

I have sent them an email over saying they have not complied with my request

and will now await to see what other B.S they come up with.

 

Finally in the letter you will not believe what I caught them out on and I pointed this out in the email,

the balance they say I owe was originally £1381.86 it is now £1371.86

I think what they have done again to prevent it going Stat Barred is place the £10.00 postal order I sent for the SARlink3.gif request on to the account

to make it look like I have made a payment,

 

they are in fact breaking the law and what also looks like committing fraud I would say.

 

I am trying not to stress over this but would you guys think it would be best for me to make my SAR request directly to HSBC and advise MKDP that I have done so?

 

As far as I am concerned this debt is in dispute and if it goes to court I will sue them for the amount of stress

they have placed on me over the last 18 months. Any help guys would be totally awesome.

 

Thanks All.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got this from HSBC/First Direct today

 

the account that the DCA are chasing has claimed the debt is for a current account,

 

now HSBC/First Direct have said in regards to that account they do not have any statements for as it was closed back in 2004

 

the only thing they sent me was 4 statements from the old credit card account that was fully paid and closed back in 2002

 

also I have attempted to use the statue barred letter

 

but MKDP are having none of it as I used the SARlink3.gif before back in 2010 with another DCA

who again couldn't get the information requested from the original creditor

 

so MKDP have said oh you made a payment to the alleged account in that time period, I know for a fact that I did not.

 

So in light of this new information from the original creditor

can I not just now go to this clown of a DCA and tell them to finally go away.....

 

.. As if there are no statements relating to the alleged account and the original creditor has also not advised on any outstanding balance

this really should be case closed should it not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha they have told me that it's not Statue Barred and that the last payment was back in 2010..

... Now that payment was to another DCAlink3.gif to obtain either a CCA or SARlink3.gif and not a payment on the account, all of which I have the evidence for.

 

In relation to what the original creditor has posted back to me in the SARlink3.gif request

I put forward to them, they can not produce any statements of account as it was closed back in 2004

but they could produce statements for a credit card that was fully paid back in 2002 and closed,

in relation to a segment of the email this Lauren Taylor sent over:

 

I must advise that Statements of Account are unavailable due to the age of the account as they are only obliged to hold this information for a period of six years. This does not affect your liability on this account.

 

HSBClink3.gif closed your account in 2004 as this was when the account defaulted and HSBC cannot sell on an open account. Therefore, at this time we do not regard the account as in dispute. We will resume our attempts to contact you to discuss a suitable repayment method regarding this account.

 

If a DCA was chasing you for a debt and they could not produce statements of account would you pay them?

 

I know I wouldn't and yes also the original creditor can sell the debt on whenever they like......

 

this has been going on for over 2 years now and I am now ready to take legal action against them if I have to.

 

Even when over 2 years ago now I sent a CCA Requestlink3.gif and each and every 4 week

 

I got a letter back stating they are liaising with the Original Creditor and will let me know when they have the information to hand..

 

..... Then all of a sudden this year they say "Oh wait a second it's not a credit account but a bank account!!!" what a load of c**p this is.........

 

I have had enough of this lot, again in my way of thinking....

 

.. If the DCA and the Original Creditor can not produce statements of account or any other additional information then this should be case closed in my eyes,

 

as this woman Lauren Taylor from MKDP LLP AKA COMPELLO OPERATIONS is really starting to get to me,

 

my father is currently undergoing Chemotherapy for Cancer and the last thing on my mind right now is a stupid alleged debt to a company that can not prove it....

 

... All they can prove is payments on to account and not how the debt originated.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Soin relation to my post 2 mins ago should I sent them another Statue Barred letter?

 

Yes, send them the follow up letter which I have linked below.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387434-Follow-up-Letter-where-Statute-Barred-Debt-is-still-being-pursued.

 

Just because the company chooses to apply the statutory legal fee for a SAR or CCA request, it cannot be claimed that YOU made a payment to the account. You didn't.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I so wish you had waited and not started another thread.

 

I am going to merge this with the original one and reopen.

 

It was an error, pure and simple.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No that was a totally different matter this is to do with First Direct........ So like I say I don't know where to go with this from here........ :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

OK guys again things have been quiet but

 

have had a letter from Lauren Taylor from MKDP stating that they now again wnat me to make a payment arrangment,

 

funny thing is I have had a letter from First Direct stating that this was nothing to do with a Current Account as MKDP advised

but was to do with a Credit card Account that

 

they sent me a copy of a statement for stating that there was a credit of 1370.00 paid on there back in November/December 2002 and the ballance showing as Nil.....

 

..... I have sent them MKDP an email yesterday and followed it up again today after getting another letter from them for a "Final Warning"

 

I have also attached to the email a copy of the letter from First Direct along with the statement they sent......

 

....... So what should I be doing in rgegards to this now,

 

as First Direct can not obtain a credit agreement or anything else for that matter,

 

it states that the balance is nil,

 

I have not acknowledged any debt to the lot at MKDP.

 

So what do i do now,

 

besides go back to the Financial Ombudsman?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you now know its a credit card

 

they MUST [MKDP] hold the CCA to deman anything from you.

 

put up KKDP or shut up/

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you sent MKDP a CCA request again.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny thing is

 

I have sent an SAR request to First Direct

 

they came back with credit card statements funny enough

but could'nt come up with bank account statements as they dont have them on file anymore, and

 

all the time I hvae been telling MKDP via email

 

all of which I have kept this Lauren Taylor keeps saying its a Bank Account so pay up.......

 

Well I got enough evidence to take this to court now if I have to and

I even copied one of her emails to me telling me so,

 

now I think the tables have turned

 

what do you think a Judge would say?

 

They have been chasing me for this for over 3 years,

 

I remeber when I sent them the CCA request

I still have letters for and

 

every 34 weeks I would get a lett saying they were still waiting for the original creditor to find it,

 

it went quiet for a year after that then they said

"Oh wait it's a bank account and not regulated under the Consumer Credit Act"

 

Well the letter from First Direct has proved otherwise..... So what should I do now.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes with an attached copy of the letter from the OC

stating it IS an account covered by CCA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I will do this again on Saturday,

 

funny enough I have found some more old letters from other DCA's dating back to 2005 2006 and 2007

 

all of which were sent CCA request and

 

they kept going back to me saying oh get in touch with the original creditor for this,

 

I do have a lot of evidence to go by if this lot at MKDP take it further,

 

I'll do that first thing on Monday and

 

will be sending further info on this to the Financial Ombudsman as I also approched them and

 

they have logged a complaint againt the dca and the original creditor

 

I think I have covered all the basis so far,

 

I'm just waiting for this Lauren Taylor to reply to my email about it,

 

looks like she is burying her head in the sand in light of this now. :|

 

yes with an attached copy of the letter from the OC

stating it IS an account covered by CCA

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha, I have just had an email from a Debbie Jones now saying the following:

 

 

Thank you for your email.

 

I understand you believe this account to be settled.

 

You have attached a First Direct statement showing a nil balance.

 

The statement you have provided relates to a credit card account.

 

The account held by MKDP LLP is not a credit card account,

 

it is a current account with the account number ******/********.

 

We have previously advised you that we have raised your concerns with HSBC

and they do not have a record of an unresolved dispute on file.

 

I will arrange to forward you a list of transactions you have made to this account, since it was charged off, by post.

 

Kind Regards

 

Debbie Jones

MKDP LLP

Link to post
Share on other sites

for what?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever had a current account with HSBC?

 

 

Has this account at anytime been in the hands of the Lowell Group?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

 

And it wasn't with HSBC it was with First Direct and

it wasn't overdrawn it was closed when the credit card got a default on it

and the debt was for just over £1300 approx the same amount that this DCA is asking for,

 

noe First Direct in their letter have stated this is nothing to do with a Bank Account

and is to do with the Credit Card,

 

funny thing is they can not get any statements for the bank account

but they can for the credit card and

 

the credit card statement in black and white clearly shows that there was a credit paid on to it in Decemeber 2002

for just over £1300 approx.

 

So I rest my case.

 

And no this hasn't come from Lowell Group,

it has been with different DCA's before now all of which had the CCA request

but could they provide any evidence? No is the short answer.........

 

Have you ever had a current account with HSBC?

 

 

Has this account at anytime been in the hands of the Lowell Group?

Link to post
Share on other sites

First Direct is HSBC on line banking. Not sure if First Direct issued CCs under this trading style.

A SAR to HSBC/First Direct should be your next move.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...