Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Westminster...Capita...Eq uita. Pressure mounting for investigation into conflict of interest !!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3847 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well well what a surprise !!!!

 

 

.

 

 

For a full copy of the article...please see the link at the end of this post......

 

 

COUNCIL bosses are under pressure to investigate a possible conflict of interest after it emerged the company that hands out council tax benefit is also in charge of bailiffs that chase unpaid rates.

 

Capita Group have an £11.5million annual contract to manage various services on behalf of Westminster, including collecting council tax and providing advice to residents who apply for reduced rates.

 

When residents fall behind on council tax, private bailiffs are employed to pursue the debt.

 

But unbeknown to them, Equita Ltd, one of the bailiff companies used by Westminster, are owned by Capita Group.

 

It has led to claims of a “pincer movement” against residents as those who are unable to pay full council tax or think they qualify for an exemption have to contact Capita to put their case.

 

If people are unsuccessful, and fail to keep up payments, their debt will pursued by bailiffs who include Equita.

 

Capita say there is no conflict because both contracts were secured after a “rigorous and competitive tender process”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.westendextra.com/news/2013/aug/call-probe-%E2%80%98bailiffs-and-tax-collector%E2%80%99-link

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capita say there is no conflict because both contracts were secured after a “rigorous and competitive tender process”.

 

Well they would say that, wouldn't they !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical of Capita to misdirect the argument. The conflict is not the selection of which bailiff company they use.

One of the conflicts arise when they know when bailiffs are overcharging but refuse to admit it and back the bailiffs through thick and thin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All this will bite Crapita, and councils badly on the bum, unless they try to bury this gem quick smart.

 

It is an obvious conflict if the very company assessing and awarding the benefit and concessions are also owners of the bailiffs they send in for non payment. It also begs the question, how many people in dire circumstances who are entitled to Council Tax relief either full or in part have had their claim rejected, then Crapita send in the bailiffs to collect the manufactured debt?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This story is merely the "tip of the iceberg". You only have to put the words...Capita...Equita...and Birmingham into a Google search and you will see hundreds of complaints about the "conflict of interest" between such a set up. It is my understanding that with this particular contract (Westminster) which was secured after a “rigorous and competitive tender process” the "contract" was awarded for an astonishing 25 years !!!

 

Strange ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time for an FOI request to be made to Birmingham City Council and its close neighbour....Coventry.

 

I have been looking over a few enquiries that I have received over the past couple of weeks and it would "appear" that "Capita" who are the "back office" providers to Birmingham City Council are permitting their bailiff provider; Equita Ltd ( who are of course owned by Capita) to charge financially impoverished debtors an "attending to remove" fee of £220 !!!

 

Any yet, their close neighbour......Coventry City Council appear to only allow their bailiff providers to charge an "attending to remove" fee of £110.

 

So...why would Capita (who own Equita Ltd) allow their bailiff provider to charge an ATR fee of £220 when their close neighbour (Coventry) allow their bailiff companies to charge half the amount (ie £110). Very odd......

 

Could it be because Coventry issued a "competitive" bailiff tender" ? No....surely not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law allows only for costs reasonably incurred. It's the same bailiff firm so the only difference between attending with a vehicle is location. It therefore must mean petrol and road tolls in Birmingham are twice that of Coventry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law allows only for costs reasonably incurred. It's the same bailiff firm so the only difference between attending with a vehicle is location. It therefore must mean petrol and road tolls in Birmingham are twice that of Coventry.

They must use the M6 Toll road then.....

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

.

 

 

I knew there had to be a simple reason and there was me thinking that Capita and Equita were in cahoots......

 

Wash my mouth out with soap !!!

Well that M6 Toll will cost them a fiver for a Berlingo, so they want £150, or a tenner for a Sprinter, so they want £220. No seriously TT there is something severely wrong with any tie up between the office contractor, and the bailiffs they instruct belonging to the SAME parent company. If they were City traders it could amount to illegal Insider dealing,

Edited by brassnecked
replace R with E LOL

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No seriously TT there is something severely wrong with any tie up between the office contractor, and the bailiffs they instruct belonging to the SAMR parent company. If they were City traders it could amount to illegal Insider dealing,

 

.

 

brassnecked.....well put.

 

I will be making the FOI request to both local authorities later today. I am not in any way trying to find fault with Coventry but will merely be trying to establish how many companies tendered for their bailiff services contract and how it was advertised. I will be asking the same of Birmingham.

 

Now.... what about this scenario. Lets assume that Birmingham did have a "competetive tender" process in place and the tender was properly advertised.......I wondered WHO makes the ultimate decesion as to WHICH company to award the contract to? What's the chances that the decesion process is all down to Capita?

Link to post
Share on other sites

TT

 

You could write to Mr Pickles asking him to look into this issue and to provide information on the legislation that councils have to follow to ensure no conflict of interest happens between suppliers of different council services.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

TT

 

You could write to Mr Pickles asking him to look into this issue and to provide information on the legislation that councils have to follow to ensure no conflict of interest happens between suppliers of different council services.

 

.

.

My lips are sealed at this present time suffice to say....... that I am in contact with some very "important" people on this serious issue. !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

 

brassnecked.....well put.

 

I will be making the FOI request to both local authorities later today. I am not in any way trying to find fault with Coventry but will merely be trying to establish how many companies tendered for their bailiff services contract and how it was advertised. I will be asking the same of Birmingham.

 

Now.... what about this scenario. Lets assume that Birmingham did have a "competetive tender" process in place and the tender was properly advertised.......I wondered WHO makes the ultimate decesion as to WHICH company to award the contract to? What's the chances that the decesion process is all down to Capita?

 

Odds on or better than evens, that Capita have a significant input into the decision making process, if not doing it all themselves to "save the council the bother"

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

 

brassnecked.....well put.

 

I will be making the FOI request to both local authorities later today. I am not in any way trying to find fault with Coventry but will merely be trying to establish how many companies tendered for their bailiff services contract and how it was advertised. I will be asking the same of Birmingham.

 

Now.... what about this scenario. Lets assume that Birmingham did have a "competetive tender" process in place and the tender was properly advertised.......I wondered WHO makes the ultimate decesion as to WHICH company to award the contract to? What's the chances that the decesion process is all down to Capita?

 

Have to be honest and say you will find Coventry every bit as bad as any other. After all they allowed one of their contractors - Newlyn - to send a Bankruptcy letter to one of their residents for £42-50!.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to be honest and say you will find Coventry every bit as bad as any other. After all they allowed one of their contractors - Newlyn - to send a Bankruptcy letter to one of their residents for £42-50!.

Absolutely PT, none of them come out of this with "clean hands" so to speak

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely PT, none of them come out of this with "clean hands" so to speak

 

In my view the only way thiswill ever get cleaned up is by an example being made of offending Bailiffs - advance fee fraud being an example, and the company behind them having their "licence" removed for aiding & abetting them.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my view the only way thiswill ever get cleaned up is by an example being made of offending Bailiffs - advance fee fraud being an example, and the company behind them having their "licence" removed for aiding & abetting them.

As Capita appear to run the whole shebang, this will not happen short of a revolution and politicians heads on pikes outside Traitors Gate, with Capita removed from any involvement in government function at all levels. they are too big, have too much influence and Capita are corrosive to democracy, as they run beyond control in effect.

Edited by brassnecked

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to be honest and say you will find Coventry every bit as bad as any other. After all they allowed one of their contractors - Newlyn - to send a Bankruptcy letter to one of their residents for £42-50!.

 

.

.

Coventry Council have had some dreadful bad press about their bailiff provider (Newlyn) but a few days ago they published a new Bailiff Guide. I haven't had a chance to read it yet. Hopefully there are a lot of improvements. Weekend reading.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

.

Coventry Council have had some dreadful bad press about their bailiff provider (Newlyn) but a few days ago they published a new Bailiff Guide. I haven't had a chance to read it yet. Hopefully there are a lot of improvements. Weekend reading.....

 

I think you may find that this "new" guide is based on the current information given by Mr Pickles recently and they are making a song and dance as being the first Council to sign up to it, More smoke & mirrors I am afraid.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may find that this "new" guide is based on the current information given by Mr Pickles recently and they are making a song and dance as being the first Council to sign up to it, More smoke & mirrors I am afraid.

 

A Journalist send me a link to their new Bailiff Guide on Monday but so far I have not had time to read it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...