Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TV License fines....BBC responsible for over 10% of all criminal prosecutions in Magistrates Courts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3675 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 214
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The Distress Warrant is not obtained by Capita.

 

The decision to issue a Distress Warrant is one that is taken by the Fines Officer. The Distress Warrant is sent to the relevant enforcement company electronically.

 

There is indeed a requirement to advise the debtor in advance that a Distress Warrant will be issued and this is satisfied by sending a Further Steps Notice to the debtor at the address on the court file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Distress Warrant is not obtained by Capita.

 

The decision to issue a Distress Warrant is one that is taken by the Fines Officer. The Distress Warrant is sent to the relevant enforcement company electronically.

 

There is indeed a requirement to advise the debtor in advance that a Distress Warrant will be issued and this is satisfied by sending a Further Steps Notice to the debtor at the address on the court file.

 

You have jumped the gun, so to speak, you are quite correct as to what happens after conviction, however, at this stage Mr T.H.E. Occupier has sent Crapita Goon away with a flea in their ear, when he called on the unlicensed property; so the disgruntled salesman swears on oath there is evidence of TV usage even though Mr Occupier has no TV, dopey beak grants the Search Warrant, which Saleman uses along with a tame plod to gain entry and terrorise Mr Occupier into admitting to watching Eastbenders on his Amstrad 1640 PC over his dialup modem. The confession ensures a conviction even though it would be impossible to view a live TV stream over a dialup connection on an Amstrad 1640 PC as it is too old to do any more than type a letter, or run basic software from the 1980s from a floppy disk, it having no graphic capabilities beyond Commander Keen a game from 1991on floppy disk, and could never display or even process digital TV nor has a slot to put a TV card in.

 

This is the sort of shenanigans we are up against with Capita aka TVL. I am not exaggerating BTW

 

This is one of the biggest can of worms the government would rather stay closed as the TV Tax is a money earner for the BBC and Capita, the fines are a revenue stream for HMCS, and their bailiff contractors.

Edited by brassnecked

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they did apply for a warrant would they have to inform the individual in advance..

 

From personal experiences then I take it Cd !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My tv is going to be clearly visible through the front window, the back of it is anyway. And I'm still going to be viewing stuff I've downloaded on it when I get the right connectors. But they won't be proving anything as even if it were hooked up to an aerial system no-one could see the screen from outside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The BBC must surely be worried at the way in which the electronic age has taken off so quickly. Neither one of my son's has a TV Licence in their homes as they only watch TV through their computers and apparently, this is a common scenario in many homes with "younger" occupants .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what email to look at..

 

The e-mails you receive when a new post is made on your subscribed threads (if you have that facility turned on)

 

Anyway, it is not important and not up for discussion.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is important to note that there is currently a Private Members Bill before Parliament that is called the BBC Licence Fee (Civil Debt) Bill 2013-2014 which had it's First Reading in June and the Second Reading reading of the Bill is scheduled for 22nd November 2013.

 

The Bill is to make provision to decriminalise the non payment of the BBC Licence fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A step in the right direction, however abolition of the TV tax, and yes it has been admitted in Parliament that it IS a tax, would be better with an opt in fee like a subscription may be better.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a big possibility they are bringing in a compusory charge for every household in southern ireland wether you have a tv or not, which will circumvent watching none live tv ,wouldnt be suprised if they do likewise in uk.

Living in the wild windy west of Ireland

Link to post
Share on other sites

The BBC have been after extending the TV license to include computers and devices for years, and they will seize on this Irish idea like a pitbull on a bone.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a big possibility they are bringing in a compusory charge for every household in southern ireland wether you have a tv or not, which will circumvent watching none live tv ,wouldnt be suprised if they do likewise in uk.

The Poll Tax is dead, Long Live the Poll Tax!

Almost the same scenario, just drssed in different words by the duplicitous orators that form parliament.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...